Pak Mei Website [Archive] - Kung Fu Magazine Forums

Third Degree

05-24-2002, 06:31 PM

What do people make of the people at this site http://www.pakmei.net as their lineage - http://www.pakmei.net/lineage/ - comes from Ng Nam Ging which is where Dr Wong learned his Pak Mei.

They say that they are genuine Pak Mei practioners as "One special student was given a copy of the styles manuscript which was copied and given back to his sifu. This book stems from Cheung Lai Chun and contains the sets, medicines, lists of todei and other important information. We have this manuscript."

From reading this and other written articles on their website, you would say they might be the real deal.

Are they?

Oh yeah, they have a nice dig at Dr Wong with " Anyone claiming to come from him [Ng Nam Ging] would have to be todei. Holding up placards as evidence of a teaching license is NOT Pak Mei!!

Poor Dr Wong, getting abuse left right and centre!!

tnwingtsun

05-25-2002, 01:48 AM

I'm going to make this short for now because I haven't been to this board in awhile and I'm on the way to bed.

guohuen-dissipointed with you,I usualy agree with most of your posts(BTW,did you ever go to school in Na-Thrang?),tisk,tisk.

MantisWill-If you're embarressed,then hide your head,the info you give on your profile shows you have very little knowledge,so you get a BIG X-out.

begby-Are you in NYC??
You claim to have seen "Real Bai Mei",from who?
Does the name Chen(Seuy)Dor ring a bell?
It does with me,I've crossed hands with him,when he came to visit Dr.Wong with three of his students two years ago,I don't think he would give you the time of the day,but then again I'm just guessing like you based on what you've said(he's in NYC,ask him about Dr.Wong),come visit and find out for youself.
I've just dropped a dime on somebody(Chen Dor),your turn Mr. Real Pak Mei,you need to change your name to clueless,"fraudulent schools",once again,come find out for yourself,or just keep amusing yourself and others with your BS.

"Oh yeah, they have a nice dig at Dr Wong with " Anyone claiming to come from him [Ng Nam Ging] would have to be todei. Holding up placards as evidence of a teaching license is NOT Pak Mei!!"

Well,I have seen a class photo(late 1960s),Dr.Wong is seated to the right hand side of Ng Nam King,one other was to the left,the rest of the class were standing,go figure.

These insults are based on show demo videos,you people have alot to learn.

I have been a friend,student of Dr.Wong's since 1985,if you wish to insult him based on ignorance(which is what this thread boils down to) then so be it.

His website is run by a student,maybe the site needs to be refreshed,Dr.Wong does not bother himself with trival matters,he's much to busy,if you want to stir the pot come here yourself,I'd be glad to meet you at the airport,he's easy to find.

guohuen

05-25-2002, 06:55 AM

Thanks Tnwingtsun. I need to not post when I'm in a foul mood. I have a tendency to say stupid things. Yea, but only spent a little over 90 days there. (Na-Trang)

Third Degree

05-25-2002, 12:34 PM

Originally posted by tnwingtsun

"Oh yeah, they have a nice dig at Dr Wong with " Anyone claiming to come from him [Ng Nam Ging] would have to be todei. Holding up placards as evidence of a teaching license is NOT Pak Mei!!"

Well,I have seen a class photo(late 1960s),Dr.Wong is seated to the right hand side of Ng Nam King,one other was to the left,the rest of the class were standing,go figure.

These insults are based on show demo videos,you people have alot to learn.

I have been a friend,student of Dr.Wong's since 1985,if you wish to insult him based on ignorance(which is what this thread boils down to) then so be it.

I just saw the quote (and another about people saying "tremor power" to proclaim themselves as pak mei practioners) and I assumed it was highlighting Dr Wong and the website. Most people would assume this, as the quote does not discount anyone or implicate anyone so it is open to interpretation. I'm glad you have set the record straight.

The main theme of this thread is that the videos of Dr Wong and his tremor power look, on the basis of video evidence only, a bit false - some even questioning his pak mei based purely off video evidence, which is misguided.

"ignorance" is a lack of knowledge and I don't profess to be great-shakes at Physical Dynamics but the people on those 5 videos seem to jump voluntarily as opposed to falling under the action of an external force. This is what has prompted the jibes.

Look at the woman in clip 5. She clearly forgets to fall down and then falls down in an unconvincing manner whilst remembering to fall and getting the stare-glare off Dr Wong.

In clip 2, Dr Wong is strong enough to stand in the same place whilst being confronted with 11 people pushing his way but in clip 5 with only 2 people in front of him, Dr Wong almost falls over backwards. Falling over may be an over exaggeration but he takes 2-3 steps back.

If these clips are genuine and Dr Wong was my Sifu, even I would say these clips to the untrained eye look a bit false.

Dr Wong must be a good pak mei practioner as, if you know your real pak mei history, Cheung Beng Fat was his Sifu.

tnwingtsun

05-25-2002, 03:25 PM

I'll address this in a few posts,the grills ready and its time to char some mammal flesh.

guohuen-You're welcome(And thank you,I had a Uncle that was an instructor/MACV Recondo),I need not post when I'm sleepy,I have a tendency not to be as clear as I should.:)

Third Degree-"If these clips are genuine and Dr Wong was my Sifu, even I would say these clips to the untrained eye look a bit false."

I agree,I've been bounced off by him many times,nothing false about it.

" Look at the woman in clip 5. She clearly forgets to fall down and then falls down in an unconvincing manner whilst remembering to fall and getting the stare-glare off Dr Wong."

Ah,but L_ _ _ does not because he absorbed the force that came his way,no "stare-glare" at him.

"stare-glare",think about this statment,your statement reguarding someone you've never met,your interpretetion.
Webster's dictionary defines "Glare" as 1: a harsh dazzling light
2: an angry or fierce stare.

You see words mean things,I saw no angry or fierce stare.

Be back latter to finish.

fiercest tiger

05-25-2002, 03:53 PM

Well im not bak mei but i will say this if he isnt reconised then why hasnt he been shut down?

Bak Mei fighting Bak Mei, its a shame! I have spoken to Dr Wong on the phone and through email about this tremor ging as i too was alittle if'y about it!
He has invited me to visit him and he will even look after me, i can say this he has a very kind heart and the mpegs dont show any justice.
As don said maybe u should visit and see 1st hand, cause thats what i am gonna do in september hopefully.

Don,
save me a kangaroo steak buddy?

About the mpegs, there is a hsing yi teacher doing the same but yelling as they bounce of him in all sorts of positions, standing sitting,attacks from the front,side and back! Can this be true? Is tremor ging true?

Taiji has different types of ging and claim un-natural stuff as well!

anyways just my 2 cents worth!

FT- Garry:)

tnwingtsun

05-25-2002, 11:03 PM

Come visit me,nuff said

BIU JI

05-26-2002, 05:56 PM

Why don't you go visit and prove that it's all a fraud if you're so sure ! Are you 100% sure of your words, enough to back it up !:o

EAZ

05-27-2002, 01:47 AM

i would just like to say that whatever people's opinion's are in this debate, I stand up and say one thing:

I visited Dr Wong's school in Tennessee 6 years ago and was treated in a most kind and generous manner despite the fact that my level of practice was lower then today and that their manner of practicing Pak Mei differed greatly from mine.

Therefore I think everyone has a right to their own opinion and indeed, if this video has been put on the net, people have the right to criticize it. Go ahead and more on my web site and or on anyothers and make your own judgement or opinion.

HOWEVER, treating dr Wong with anything other than respect shows a lack of respect for a good man.

Third Degree's questioning are the most lucid on this thread and are what I would call overall constructive criticism.

Anyone else should, as the French say, put "de l'eau dans son vin' or put water in their cup of wine, a manner of saying pull back from strongly worded opinions.

crumpet

05-27-2002, 02:43 AM

Originally posted by fiercest tiger
He has invited me to visit him and he will even look after me, i can say this he has a very kind heart and the mpegs dont show any justice.

Originally posted by EAZ
I visited Dr Wong's school in Tennessee 6 years ago and was treated in a most kind and generous manner despite the fact that my level of practice was lower then today and that their manner of practicing Pak Mei differed greatly from mine.

the issue at hand is the pak mei skill of the sifu, not his personal character. No one is arguing whether he is a kind and generous man, that really has nothing to do with the debate over his power of tremor demo.

tnwingtsun

05-27-2002, 03:58 AM

tnwingtsun

05-27-2002, 04:02 AM

begby,you must be young,you're words show,you seem to be fixated on Star wars movies,you slam other schools claiming to have been exposed to the real"Pak Mei",yet you won't say who these teachers are,or if you have trained with them,you say you're in NYC,if so then who have you trained with??

Put up or shut up,who is your Sifu?

Do you even have one,why hide?

I said before and I'll say again that I'd be happy to meet you at the airport and welcome you to cross hands,with me,I'm not so good but at least if you best me you can move on to higher levels.

Its easy to run your mouth from NYC,its another thing to come down and find out for yourself,we have nothing to prove,but why come here?

Seek out Chen Dor and his students,talk your crap with with them,Chen Dor and Dr.Wong are tight,I'm not hiding my Sifu,you are,come out of the closet if you have the balls.

Troll,troll,troll

EAZ,I wish I'd been there when you came,I was away at work.

Yes Dr.Wong is a good hearted fellow,those who have knowledge in Bai Mei will relize that he is only showing the nice Bai Mei,why show the the the killing stuff in a demo,most Bai Mei Sifu's don't.

begby-If you have a Bai Mei sifu worth a $hit then you should know this,once again you seem clueless,come out and show yourself,you know my name.

EAZ-please contact me if you ever come this way again,I have many Vietnamese friends here but I don't know if they know Bai Mei or the Viet name for Bai mei.

crumpet-good point,will adress your point when I have time.

Once again,I'm both flattered by the the exchange of ideas(although some misunderstood) amused for the ignorance/amusment showed by those that have not a clue.

The guy in NYC,I feel sorry for you because you are close to some great Bai-Mei schools,too bad they won't let you in,must be something wrong with you,grow up and maybe you'll have a chance

;)

fiercest tiger

05-27-2002, 05:22 AM

LOL, good point! I shouldnt butt into bak mei politics... :eek:

He still is a nice chap! hahaha:D

strangecaptain

05-27-2002, 08:44 AM

Begby:

You do not study Bak Mei? But you have seen some? So that is what makes you an authority?

"I think what you're saying could best be summarized in the immortal words of Charlie Brown's teacher, "wonk wonkwonk wonkwonkwonk wonk"

or should I say, "wong wongwong wongwongwong wong"?

Blind since 1985, ha? Doesn't seem like your seeing eye dog is really helping you too much. Seems more like it's biting you - RIGHT IN THE _____!"

This is inappropriate. In public, it is impolite to insult teachers. You need to learn manners and respect as well as physical prowess. Constructive and/or skeptical critiques are one thing, but your posts are venomous. Such an attitude is not compatible with a search for truth. So, what is your agenda, Begby? Who is feeding you your information? "Who the cap fit, let them wear it." You should recognize that quote. Also, try listening to a song called "Craven Choke Puppy." It takes more than pot and reggae music to find righteosness, Begby. But with honesty, open mindedness, and willingness, you will find it. Just do not ever give up!

In general:

I have watched this forum for some time and even posted very occasionally. Those of you who come here regularly know we have seen all kinds of flames and discussions regarding various subjects all of which fit under one basic topic: "What is Bak Mei Kung Fu?" So, What is it? Certain patterns? Certain techniques? Certain concepts? A proper lineage? A sincere commitment to all of the above? I myself have seen 3 considerably different versions of the same pattern as performed by 3 different high level practicioners. Furthermore, all 3 practicioners have very legitimate lineage. Who is right, and who is wrong of these three? I am not arguing that anything that is claimed as Bak Mei is necessarily such. I just wanted to place some of this discussion in context.

The Power of Sudden Tremors is a Bak Mei concept. It is a measured expression of the urge to preserve one's life under duress facilitated by a state of mental readiness, and the application of very basic physical laws. I am in the video in question. I for one did not fake my part. Crumpet said this is not a character issue. If we are talking about the mechanics of this type of jin, then Crumpet is right. If we are discussing rather or not the actions in this video are preplanned reactions by the students, then it is a character issue. It is an issue of integrity on our school's part because anyone with integrity would not claim something that he/she knew was not true. I can not present you with a diploma from Integrity University. In order to make an informed judgement about our integrity, you would have to get to know us. For the most part, we do not care what others think about what we do. Obviously, I care enough to write a long post in response to what I view as insults to my teacher's integrity. If we are discussing The Power of Sudden Tremors and its mechanics, even skeptically, I am into it. If you are resorting to character assasination, then you are a lonely little soldier defending a fortress of psuedo-rationality. Ultimately, such a person damages only themselves. People become this way when the search for truth and the ego clash and the ego wins. Well, my morning coffee is done, so I guess I done staring at the internut for now. Later ya'll.

TIger Hand

05-27-2002, 07:13 PM

I'm sure Dr. Wong is a nice guy, but that video still looks like BOOSHEET to me.

And i don't need to "cross hands" with anyone to say that.

But, hey that's just my opinion, why should anyone care!

tnwingtsun

05-27-2002, 09:50 PM

"Hi Don: I just wrote you a note and then went to the forum and find out 2 things. (1)The guy tried to discredit me as not a student of Ng came from the Pai-lum-White Eyebrow group. He is Mike Ducet who tries to promote his teacher as the "designated successor of Ng". I found out from Ng's oldest son Stephen Ng, just not too long ago that his teacher had no more than 3 yr's training from my junior Chang Siu Man. This group is at best conmen. All the negative remarks are pushing me aside so that one day they sell tapes for monetary gain.
(2) The demonstration tape recorded an event in March 2001.
The team members included students whose ages of training ranging from 6 months to 12 years; and the woman looked not natural came from the tai-chi group as a beginner. Tai chi students don't fall fast as she did not have sufficient training to fall like the Bai-mei group. I have not looked at Luke's work at the website. He might confused my teacher Beng-fat with his brother Beng-lum--and this will be corrected. For copyright, Luke hesitated to release the tape for 2000 March event. I will tell him to post the group involved in the power of tremor demonstration instead of the one on the current website. If you would, present what I said here to the forum to clarify the issue. The Pai-lum group tried to discredit me will run into rock as the most important elements of the internal group all know me and always received me with warmth and respect. I don't even need the recognition of the Mike-Ducet-Pai-lum people.
Warm regards. Dr. Wong"

fiercest tiger

05-27-2002, 11:06 PM

:eek: Pai Lum is that pak mei kung fu or just a mixed art? Are they the canadian school?

thanks in advance.

FT:)

meltdawn

05-28-2002, 05:51 AM

I have many new links up on the school site.

http://www.lungyingjingjung.com

A couple relate to "Pai Lum". ONLY to present what they consider to be their "relation" to the system of Lung Ying. We do not believe there to be any historical, theological or technical links between the "Pai Lum" system and ours. I do not know anything about its relations with Pak Mei, aside from what Dr. Wong has just written.

I believe the site in question is:
http://www.pakmei.net/

FT, here's the branch in your neck of the woods:
http://www.firedragon.com.au/learn/learn.html

Have fun and play nice. :)

MantisWill

05-28-2002, 11:22 AM

tnwing & whomever is interested:

I have more MA training than is in my bio. I'm still a beginner either way. But, you don't have to know MA to understand physics. Or even to sniff out bull. My engineering schooling and simple life experiences took care of that. The technique I saw on the video clips is bull. It's not possible.

But, gee, it would be great if it was....

Qi, as so many westerners mis-interpret it, doesn't exist. It's not some force that exists only in the trained martial artist's hands. You have to remember, the Chinese had no better understanding of science or medicine than any other people all those years ago. People used to think thunder was an angry god for pete's sake. If somebody, through long and harsh training and practice, developed great strength and skill, they chalked it up to Qi. And why not?

But, so many of us have wanted to believe it at some point, haven't we?

I've seen these demos for years. It's always one's own students. Never a trained opponent or even some bystander. I understand the legalities, but, honestly, never someone else? These people don't look like they are being knocked down; they look like they are falling on their own accord. Not to mention UN-hurt. I have eyes and a brain. You even back it up by saying about the one late-falling woman, "Tai chi students don't fall fast as she did not have sufficient training to fall like the Bai-mei group". Exactly. Trained to fall fast. Why not resist this "tremor"?

But it sure gets the gullible and the want-to-believers excited about MAs, doesn't it?

I have never even heard of anyone ever seeing this technique used against a hostile attacker, let alone seen it myself. Ever. I know people claim some ridiculous things, but I only hear this story when somebody recounts a bad movie or much-clouded-by-myth story of an old master.

But, it's the ultimate way to kick that bully's ass, and I need it to be true.....

If I was uneducated in the ways of a trained martial artist, and I saw a monk dispense with 4 bandits and send them flying with purely normal throws & blows (like we all have done to someone at some point), I might think he had some mysterious power. Qi would be my first candidate.

I personally believe in, for lack of a better term, God, and a resultant life force. I just don't believe you shoot it out of your hands. Leave that to Yoda.

Qi is nothing more than a combination of mental focus, training, good health, and learned skill. It is not a secret. Most people, as they age, realize that many things aren't as exciting underneath the surface as we once thought. Self-defense, done right, is downright boring. But there is satisfaction to be gained in pursuing this goal. The real deal.

I'm sure your Sifu is a wonderful man and a first-rate martial artist. I don't know him or any of his students, so, I'll take your word.

I just know that those clips are bull.

I'm embarrassed for all those on both sides of the fence who believe them.

strangecaptain

05-28-2002, 01:22 PM

Thank you for doubting without being insulting. Here is some food for thought. The following questions are relevant to the subject at hand:

1)What is the effect of having a unified body (i.e., a body whose various parts work synchronously) on power generation in striking and on conversion of potential energy to kinetic energy?

2)What is the advantage of using a phoenix eye fist to strike?

3)Is it possible to strike with body parts other than the fists, feet, and head?

4)Which is more "stable": a pyramid sitting on its base or a pyramid sitting on its point? A ball rolling down a hill or a ball at the bottom of the hill lying still?

5)What is the difference between a body in motion and lying still?

6)Why does a boxer "roll with the punches"?

7)Do you use the same defense against every offense and the same strike for every attack?

"Qi is nothing more than a combination of mental focus, training, good health, and learned skill."

In essence, I agree with your definition of chi. I do not think there is anything particularly supernatural about it. It is important to remember that the scientific method disproves theories. It never proves them completely. Anomalous findings should be regarded with suspicion but not shoved under the rug for convenience. Engineers know that if something works, it works rather all the details of the underlying theory are worked out or not. Even classical electromagnetic theory still contains some annoying problems but it has not kept us from supplying electricity to a considerable percentage of the population of the world. I guess what I am saying is that I believe you do yourself a disservice if you discount something because you do not understand it from the standpoint of your current knowledge. Certainly, a peasant in the middle ages on looking at the sky and seeing a jet plane would think it was a dragon or something. I think also that it is important to note that western physiological knowledge knows almost nothing about the effects of having a unified body on its various functions and that the relationship between the brain and the body also holds many mysteries still. This truly is a sticky issue but fun to discuss in many ways. Thanks.

MantisWill

05-28-2002, 05:36 PM

Originally posted by strangecaptain
Thank you for doubting without being insulting.

No prob

Here is some food for thought. The following questions are relevant to the subject at hand:

1)What is the effect of having a unified body (i.e., a body whose various parts work synchronously) on power generation in striking and on conversion of potential energy to kinetic energy?

Mmm, usually, more pain. ;-) Due to increased speed or impulse.

2)What is the advantage of using a phoenix eye fist to strike?

Higher concentration of force measured in PPSI or the like.

3)Is it possible to strike with body parts other than the fists, feet, and head?

Sure

4)Which is more "stable": a pyramid sitting on its base or a pyramid sitting on its point? A ball rolling down a hill or a ball at the bottom of the hill lying still?

The ones with lower potential energy (Base and bottom)

5)What is the difference between a body in motion and lying still?

Energy changed from potential to kinetic

6)Why does a boxer "roll with the punches"?

To lengthen the time of impact (reduce impulse and therefore injury) and to lessen the angle of attack (turn vector from 90 degrees)

7)Do you use the same defense against every offense and the same strike for every attack?

Nope

"Qi is nothing more than a combination of mental focus, training, good health, and learned skill."

In essence, I agree with your definition of chi.

And I mostly agree w/you on your points. We're both revolving around the same focus.

I guess what I am saying is that I believe you do yourself a disservice if you discount something because you do not understand it from the standpoint of your current knowledge.

It's not that I don't understand it; I just don't see it. Or feel it. Unlike god. Whom I see and feel everywhere I look. Especially in quantum mechanics relativity. ;-)

I think also that it is important to note that western physiological knowledge knows almost nothing about the effects of having a unified body on its various functions and that the relationship between the brain and the body also holds many mysteries still.

True

This truly is a sticky issue but fun to discuss in many ways.

True

Thanks.

In short: To prove or disprove only what can be observed is science. To believe in something that isn't observed is faith.

If I ever actually saw something real that someone claimed was Qi, I would have no understanding of it, but I would believe it. Much like I do electric circuits (my worst course in school).

Those video clip were not believable to me. Some simple experiments would prove or disprove the claim. And I certainly don't have faith in Qi, either.

I do believe that through focus, training, and knowledge, one can improve one's health (like strengthening tendons), gain skill (like throwing foes w/ease), and build power (faster punches). In ways that may be imperceptible to an onlooker until the skill is activated (He's standing there and breathing. What does that do? Ow, why am I on the ground? ;-) ). But isn't that what a marksman does after repitition of good form or a baseball hitter achieves with lots of hitting drills? They don't claim Qi. Just hard work.

strangecaptain

05-28-2002, 11:50 PM

Cool. Enjoyable exchange.

small

07-12-2002, 07:17 AM

Regarding Your Post:

1) Lee Pai followed Cheung Siu Man to BC – and he was already a very strong kung fu exponent at that time. He had far more than 3 years with Cheung Siu Man and they still live in close proximity to each other. In fact, Cheung Siu-Man has overseen the training of Lee Pai's son and his Todei.

2) How would pushing Dr Wong aside promote any tapes that Lee or Mike might put out?

3) He makes relatively good money as a high school teacher. He only charges $40 - $50 / month – that pays the rent. He has seminars occasionally; the profits generated from them are used for his trips to BC. Does this sound like an opportunistic conman?

4) Does Dr. Wong know that you posted this letter?

5) The Pai Lum has nothing to do with Pak Mei or Dragon. Pak Mei is too difficult to teach to beginners. The Pai Lum curriculum contains some forms, drills, exercises and Taiji – where they came from is our business. There is too much completely false or misleading information about the Pai Lum and Danny Pai on the web.

This is all that I wan’t to share – and it should be enough. I have no comments on you and yours. When you are finished looking at www.pakmei.net take a peak at pakmei.in2000.com. That is Mike Doucet next to Cheng Bing Lam and Mr Yau.

Originally posted by tnwingtsun
"Hi Don: I just wrote you a note and then went to the forum and find out 2 things. (1)The guy tried to discredit me as not a student of Ng came from the Pai-lum-White Eyebrow group. He is Mike Ducet who tries to promote his teacher as the "designated successor of Ng". I found out from Ng's oldest son Stephen Ng, just not too long ago that his teacher had no more than 3 yr's training from my junior Chang Siu Man. This group is at best conmen. All the negative remarks are pushing me aside so that one day they sell tapes for monetary gain.
(2) The demonstration tape recorded an event in March 2001.
The team members included students whose ages of training ranging from 6 months to 12 years; and the woman looked not natural came from the tai-chi group as a beginner. Tai chi students don't fall fast as she did not have sufficient training to fall like the Bai-mei group. I have not looked at Luke's work at the website. He might confused my teacher Beng-fat with his brother Beng-lum--and this will be corrected. For copyright, Luke hesitated to release the tape for 2000 March event. I will tell him to post the group involved in the power of tremor demonstration instead of the one on the current website. If you would, present what I said here to the forum to clarify the issue. The Pai-lum group tried to discredit me will run into rock as the most important elements of the internal group all know me and always received me with warmth and respect. I don't even need the recognition of the Mike-Ducet-Pai-lum people.
Warm regards. Dr. Wong"

TIger Hand

07-12-2002, 05:46 PM

She fell slow because she didn't have sufficient training to fall like the bai mei group........!!!???????

I have learned for a long time,........ but never learned bai mei teaches you to fall faster.

More like she didn't have sufficient training in her acting skills.

kei lun

07-12-2002, 07:33 PM

Small:
Are you from Mike Doucetfs school? Lemme tell ya a little somthin bout dat guy. I cannot speak for the quality of his skill (if it indeed exists) and have no wish to, but I can definitely speak for the quality of his person. Doucet is an extremely rude individual with no respect for anyone. He is an embarrassment to the Bak Mei style and its followers around the world.

Kei Lun

TIger Hand

07-13-2002, 03:05 PM

Everyone talks about quality of personality. Is deceiving a quality we admire? how about fraud? I don't know Doucet or Dr. Wong and I don't really care if they have nice personalities.

I train hard and fought a lot of karatekas, judo, kickboxers...... who still call kungfu "soft style" and when i see that bak mei video i see the reason why other arts (and even other KF styles) think bak mei and KF are full of BS!

fiercest tiger

07-13-2002, 04:50 PM

:eek: LOL

OH SNAP!:D

jonlucas

07-15-2002, 08:36 PM

What happens when you push someone, very hard and very fast, in the same direction there momentum is already going? Usually they fall, sometimes they fly. What is your instinctive reaction when you suddenly lose balance, such as when you're at the edge of a cliff, or if you push hard and suddenly nothing is there? Your reflexes take over and you try to balance yourself. The concept of interception is very important in kung-fu. Not blocking or just meeting your attackers punch or kick before it reaches you. But to touch your opponent, feel the direction of force and become "attached". If your skill is good enough, you can create in your opponent the same feeling you get when you push and suddenly nothing is there. If your opponent is fully commited in his attack, then he will instinctively react and try to regain his balance. If you can feel the direction of his momention when he reacts, and if you react VERY FAST and push VERY FAST, you can send your opponent off. Your reaction has to be the same as what was described in the Pak Mei book where the monk touch CLC with a hot pipe and CLC jumped in reaction. CLC without thinking, mobilized his body's energy and jumped. It's this reaction (conciously done) that one attains through long, hard, and proper training. If everything works to its best, then you could send your opponent several feet back. Dr. Wong and his student has done this demonstration many times, and Dr. Wong has a very good feeling for his students pace and force, and his student doesn't think and just fully commits to the punch. Other students that haven't had the training may not push hard and fast enough or commit fully, thus the results may vary. Whatever he gains in his familiarity with his students doesn't diminish the fact the demonstrations require a high level of skill. Skill Dr. Wong has attained from 40+ years of training. I can say one thing for sure, none of what is done is faked or staged. In a real fight situation though, one wouldn't want to be so fancy - a square punch will do.

tnwingtsun

07-15-2002, 11:39 PM

When I turn 64 years old I hope I will have the knowledge
and the health that he(DR.Wong) has achived through his training/family and the MANY students that have
sweated blood and sacrifice to attain the Bai Mei skills that he
as not only a teacher but a father figure(Is this not what "SIFU" means?)

Some question his fighting skills based on the videos on his web site as "BS"

Thats ok for you,do you really think that you are getting everything from a web-site demo??

Who is your teacher?

Maybe you should learn more from your Sifu before you make the mistake of judging others.

Thats easy to do,life styles is another thing.

IMHO,empty your cup(YOUR CUP!),then drive on.

Not knocking Dr.Wong as a fighter which he has proven himself many times in the past,but his students from the 70's,80's and 90's into his present group is a respectible(typo) group into itself
with a different/but same concept as the begennning.

I have seen some of the best fighters Dr.Wong has put out,most of them (IMHO) would rather heal than hurt(I said most)