Hendrik
07-12-2002, 10:44 PM
WCK has two types of histories.
They are Lineage history and the root of Art history.
The lineage part depents a great deal on who is writing it.
The root of Art part has to satisfy
Purpose, Principle, Architecture Vision, signature of dominant Core technics, implementation, ....
WCK is not a collection of fragmented technics over time. WCK is not an evolution of a collective fragmented style. One can not just add everything up and claim this and that.
Often, people is trying to use the Lineage history combine with Hung Mun or other history to explain and Justified where is the root of WCK from. And ofcause he who does that will end up that his lineage is the oldest.....
Not too long ago some master of other style even claim that his stlye has all WCK....
For me, he might be a master in his own style but he doesn't know WCK.
Master or best fighters title cannot substitute
the facts in the root of art history.
What is the point to do research if the preset conclusion is to prove one's lineage ( with whatever unspecific, unrelated, oral/society/history/relegion data can be found but disregard the root of the arts.
) is the oldest.
On the other hand, what is the point to do research if deep in one's heart preseted to never belive there is a dominant root of Art for WCK which lead the search to a unconclusive result.
Finally, what is the point to do research if deep in one's heart preseted to no matter what other find one has an attitude of " oh, I know it already. Mine is the best."
They are Lineage history and the root of Art history.
The lineage part depents a great deal on who is writing it.
The root of Art part has to satisfy
Purpose, Principle, Architecture Vision, signature of dominant Core technics, implementation, ....
WCK is not a collection of fragmented technics over time. WCK is not an evolution of a collective fragmented style. One can not just add everything up and claim this and that.
Often, people is trying to use the Lineage history combine with Hung Mun or other history to explain and Justified where is the root of WCK from. And ofcause he who does that will end up that his lineage is the oldest.....
Not too long ago some master of other style even claim that his stlye has all WCK....
For me, he might be a master in his own style but he doesn't know WCK.
Master or best fighters title cannot substitute
the facts in the root of art history.
What is the point to do research if the preset conclusion is to prove one's lineage ( with whatever unspecific, unrelated, oral/society/history/relegion data can be found but disregard the root of the arts.
) is the oldest.
On the other hand, what is the point to do research if deep in one's heart preseted to never belive there is a dominant root of Art for WCK which lead the search to a unconclusive result.
Finally, what is the point to do research if deep in one's heart preseted to no matter what other find one has an attitude of " oh, I know it already. Mine is the best."