Funny Troll at Cyberkwoon

[NPMantis]

http://www.cyberkwoon.com/html/modules.php?op=modload&name=Forums&file=index&action=viewtopic&topic=7032&forum=1&start=60

For all that are interested the guy is called 'Crippler' and it's a bit of a funny debate!

(Should the link not work the post is under "General Discussion" then "What do you think is the most realistic style?" and I think he starts on page 3 or 4).

[fa_jing]

I don't find that guy funny. At least Ralek got a few yuks out of us, at times. There are times when Ralek displayed cleverness, and I always felt his attacks on CMA were mostly facetious. That guy Crippler is never funny at all, is quite offensive, and needs an ass-kicking.

[HopGar]

Agreed Fa_Jing. And quite gay as well.

Peace Y'all

[HopGar]

One more thing, I did notice this cripplers writing style is similar to Raleks. Anyone else agree?

Peace Y'all

[NPMantis]

I can't really remember Ralek that well - perhaps they are one and the same spotty 13 year old pre-pubescent child?

I highly doubt 'crippler' would meet anyone for sparring, people like that are all mouth and no trousers!

[Le nOObi]

This is why cyberkwoon is bad! I didnt read alot of it but it didnt seem like they were not able to make a great arguement against crippler. Alot of the people on cyberkwoon dont seem to have touch with reality. One of them said that in a real fight if someone tried to do a double leg take down they would get knocked out by their oppoents unpadded hands!

[Twistedstance]

He's certainly a gem. I've found him amusing myself, however it doesn't stem from him being particularly humourous.

Ralek? Rings a bell... do you think that it's the same chap?

I certainly share some of the same sentiments.. mind you, it's people like Crippler than can make the odd forum entertaining.

In a way, anyhow.:D

[fa_jing]

Here's a quote from one of my posts: "Crippler, we know Ralek, and let me tell you, you're no Ralek." Everybody hates Ralek here, but he is tolerated because of the humor aspect. HE pretty much always says something that is completely outrageous, which shows that he doesn't expect to be taken seriously. I think they make the same arguments because that's what people learn over at the Underground Forum - that "Gracies in action" and the UFC is the be-all and end-all in fights between TMA and MMA.

[Ford Prefect]

I think cyberkwoon is funny in general. I also think in debates about "realistic styles" everybody looks like an arse anyway, so it's hard to single one out.

[Royal Dragon]

All I can say, is I'm gald the powers that be here at KFM have the Balls, and moral fortitude to due the right thing without lableing members as "Trolls"

I don't see anyone here defending Child Molesters either, unlike Cyber McKwoon.

Those guys are a bunch of criminal loving (read as child molester sympathizers), pansy commie's over there, and I don't see to many of them haveing to much in common with reality.

Ok, I'm going to stop now before I really get going!!!

Except to say Cyber McKwoon = :rolleyes:

[SDriver]

I'll have you know I'm a criminal-loving pansy *socialist.*

I'm also a member of the UG, so don't forget that my knuckles drag the ground so bad I can masturbate with my elbows.

[SDriver]

Holy crap, I just figured out how to masturbate with my elbows. Gotta go.

[Ryu]

MMA vs. TCMA!!! ........ GO!!!! ;)

Ryu

[Royal Dragon]

Because they are only sport and not real fighting!!!!:D

[NPMantis]

http://www.cyberkwoon.com/html/modules.php?op=modload&name=Forums&file=index&action=viewtopic&topic=7160&forum=1

[Le nOObi]

Hey im a criminal loving pansy too!

I dont like cyberkwoon for two of reasons. The first is that many of their members believe things like in a real fight they could palm strike someone who took them down in the groin or that they could kill someone attempting a double leg takedown before they took them down simply if they werent wearing gloves.

The other reason is the fact that no one there can make a great arguement against a troll and everyone who goes there and disagrees with them is labeled a troll!

[Royal Dragon]

He's not really doing anything wrong. Yes, he's an ass, but he's not swearring, or posting links to porno's or anything like that. He's just being an ass. There is no reason to ban him, or lable him a Troll. ESPECIALLy after those guys, INCLUDING FFAB went to such extremes to defend or enable Neal C[/b]ameron.

The guy is just stirring the pot. We have had many of his types here over the years, and there has never been any reason to bann them. It's would be different if he was spamming the board to the point normal conversations could not be sustained, but he's not.

Cyber McKwoon are abunch of "Tow the line" or yur OUTTA here types. If you dissagree with them, your a troll, if you strongly defend your beliefes, you get banned. And God help you if you stand up for what's right there.

[fa_jing]

You missed it. He made one or more racist remarks.

[fa_jing]

Also, don't forget that the purpose of a forum is not to ensure free speech. It is to provide an environment that is entertaining to the forum members and keeps them coming back. Crippler was detracting from the forum, and spamming while he was at it.
I don't know much about cyberkwoon but he was extremely annoying and offered no redemptive value. Unlike some other grappler types that would actually offer advice, etc.

[Royal Dragon]

I don't frequent Cyber McKwoon often. I just logged on to Cripplers topics, and he does not seem to be a justified banning case from what I saw, just an ass.

[RENEGADE_MONK]

RD,

CK must be that little stone in your shoe that you just can't get rid of, you know its there you feel it but you just can't shake it out

[Royal Dragon]

I'm just glad we have Kung Fu Magazine!!!! This is the best Kung Fu forum (except for mine of course) there is!!!

The Mods here are strong enough to stand up for right and wrong, and you Gott'a respect that.