WushuSpear
09-25-2002, 04:08 PM
Authenticity
It's amazing that when any descussion is held on shaolin wushu, the authenticity of it's most famous practitioners is questioned. The question arises, are there still shaolin martial monks in existance today?
Now, since my introduction to this topic, I've changed my mind a couple times but currently think it's not a yes or no question. Firstly let us break it down.
Shaolin- Martial- Monk
Shaolin suggests that they'd have to belong to the shaolin temple and fall under it's authority.
Martial suggest that they would actively train in martial arts. History states that over the history of the temple, many styles were created in the temple however others werre incorporated into the curriculm due their effectiveness. So to me, modern monks studying some traditionally non-shaolin diciplines, is nothing new.
Monk is the difficult one and I do not pretend to be a buddist or even knowledgable in buddist dogma. That said, it is my understanding that buddist monks are required to follow the following rules:
chastity
no meat
poverty
No booze
Now Shaolin is not a simply case due to some decree by some Emperor granting the monks the right to drink and eat meat. It seems that today that some, if not most martial monks do partake according to Russbo's journals. Anyways, my deepest concern is that as a monk, surely you are giving yourself to the temple and owning a business would not be allowed. A lot of monks have opened schools, business, and make profit from these schools. How is this allowed? I'd understand if they stopped being monks and decided to open a school, but to be an active monk and have a business doesn't sound koser IMHO.
China today is a place of great contrasts and in many ways is a parodox. Shaolin is an interesting topic which requires an lot of digging in order to get a better understanding. I think the abbot's plans to move the temple closer to it's buddist roots are a wise move.
In conclusion, the temple has survived 1500 years and in that time I'm sure there were times when it seemed that it was at it's lowest ebb. Maybe in a hundred years, this period will be seen as one of the temple's renovations.
Hoping for some constructive debate
WushuSpear
It's amazing that when any descussion is held on shaolin wushu, the authenticity of it's most famous practitioners is questioned. The question arises, are there still shaolin martial monks in existance today?
Now, since my introduction to this topic, I've changed my mind a couple times but currently think it's not a yes or no question. Firstly let us break it down.
Shaolin- Martial- Monk
Shaolin suggests that they'd have to belong to the shaolin temple and fall under it's authority.
Martial suggest that they would actively train in martial arts. History states that over the history of the temple, many styles were created in the temple however others werre incorporated into the curriculm due their effectiveness. So to me, modern monks studying some traditionally non-shaolin diciplines, is nothing new.
Monk is the difficult one and I do not pretend to be a buddist or even knowledgable in buddist dogma. That said, it is my understanding that buddist monks are required to follow the following rules:
chastity
no meat
poverty
No booze
Now Shaolin is not a simply case due to some decree by some Emperor granting the monks the right to drink and eat meat. It seems that today that some, if not most martial monks do partake according to Russbo's journals. Anyways, my deepest concern is that as a monk, surely you are giving yourself to the temple and owning a business would not be allowed. A lot of monks have opened schools, business, and make profit from these schools. How is this allowed? I'd understand if they stopped being monks and decided to open a school, but to be an active monk and have a business doesn't sound koser IMHO.
China today is a place of great contrasts and in many ways is a parodox. Shaolin is an interesting topic which requires an lot of digging in order to get a better understanding. I think the abbot's plans to move the temple closer to it's buddist roots are a wise move.
In conclusion, the temple has survived 1500 years and in that time I'm sure there were times when it seemed that it was at it's lowest ebb. Maybe in a hundred years, this period will be seen as one of the temple's renovations.
Hoping for some constructive debate
WushuSpear