wingchunalex
12-05-2002, 09:34 PM
"I don't think hung fa yi is all it is cracked up to be. if it is such a superior style of wing chun like it claim to be, then where is the proof. its all talk. and believe me, they blaintently say that their wing chun is better than other styles of wing chun. a article by meng on this site called "is your martial art a system or a style" said that. "
I’m sorry for bad mouthing sifu meng and hung fa yi wck, they did not say that their wing chun was "better", I miss understood what was being said.
"why would meng totally desert his moy yat wing chun? why didn't he have faith in what he was doing? why will he not teach moy yat wing chun if he was such a great disciple of moy yat? Why would he have a museum basically devoted to yip man wing chun and then teach hung fa yi?"
I’m sorry for disrespecting sifu meng like this. It was rude and uncalled for.
"a student from my school went to mengs for about 3 weeks. he came back and said that he had tae kwan do studdents teaching the wing chun classes, and that they didn't even know sil lim tau."
I should not have personally attacked sifu meng’s school, whether what I heard was true or not.
i personally think that meng is hiding his moy yat wing chun and keeping it to himself because he doesn't want people to have the good wing chun.
I am sorry for saying these disrespectful things and I really had no proof. I am sorry for
publicly disrespecting sifu meng.
a student from our school had studdied with meng, he experienced having tae kwan do assistant instructors try and teach the hung fa yi class when they didn't even know sil lim tau. i've seen his advanced students chi sau and its mostly just rolling with a lot of pushing.
Im sorry for personally attacking sifu meng again. And I am also sorry for publically disrespecting his students by association.
". also with everything he (meng) writes one seems to need to have a degree in physics/philosphy to understand it.
I am sorry for my sarcastic remark, it was out of line.
All the theoretical talk about hung fa yi being more complete and purely scientific is only talk.
Again I was being rude.
I have yet to see hung fa yi proven through sparring. Its been talked about theoretically, but no proof of application has been given.
It was disrespectful of me to say that just because I have not seen hung fa yi wck applied in sparring doesn’t mean it hasn’t been at some point.
. I have yet to see hung fa yi people win chi sau competitions also.
I am sorry for another personal attack.
So again I go back to where is hung fa yi's trial by application.
Again a un-needed personal attack.
Your comment about assuming I need stitches from sparring shows how little you (Jerremy) know about sparring.
I’m sorry for bad mouthing sifu meng and hung fa yi wck, they did not say that their wing chun was "better", I miss understood what was being said.
"why would meng totally desert his moy yat wing chun? why didn't he have faith in what he was doing? why will he not teach moy yat wing chun if he was such a great disciple of moy yat? Why would he have a museum basically devoted to yip man wing chun and then teach hung fa yi?"
I’m sorry for disrespecting sifu meng like this. It was rude and uncalled for.
"a student from my school went to mengs for about 3 weeks. he came back and said that he had tae kwan do studdents teaching the wing chun classes, and that they didn't even know sil lim tau."
I should not have personally attacked sifu meng’s school, whether what I heard was true or not.
i personally think that meng is hiding his moy yat wing chun and keeping it to himself because he doesn't want people to have the good wing chun.
I am sorry for saying these disrespectful things and I really had no proof. I am sorry for
publicly disrespecting sifu meng.
a student from our school had studdied with meng, he experienced having tae kwan do assistant instructors try and teach the hung fa yi class when they didn't even know sil lim tau. i've seen his advanced students chi sau and its mostly just rolling with a lot of pushing.
Im sorry for personally attacking sifu meng again. And I am also sorry for publically disrespecting his students by association.
". also with everything he (meng) writes one seems to need to have a degree in physics/philosphy to understand it.
I am sorry for my sarcastic remark, it was out of line.
All the theoretical talk about hung fa yi being more complete and purely scientific is only talk.
Again I was being rude.
I have yet to see hung fa yi proven through sparring. Its been talked about theoretically, but no proof of application has been given.
It was disrespectful of me to say that just because I have not seen hung fa yi wck applied in sparring doesn’t mean it hasn’t been at some point.
. I have yet to see hung fa yi people win chi sau competitions also.
I am sorry for another personal attack.
So again I go back to where is hung fa yi's trial by application.
Again a un-needed personal attack.
Your comment about assuming I need stitches from sparring shows how little you (Jerremy) know about sparring.