Falcor
01-16-2004, 01:15 PM
This happened to me yesterday...
I was working out with a bunch of guys of varied background, but mostly JMA people (that's who showed up yesterday). I was one of the two CMA guys there. The workout itself was good, we learned a lot, the fellows were actually really cool, nice, etc, and we were all good at what we do and overall the evening was a good one. HOWEVER, after workout, we did the standard cool down, stretch, and shoot the breeze the discuss MA. Eventually the topic turned to one of swordsmanship and fencing, and how fencing as we know of today is derived from dueling swordsmanship of the Renaissance and beyond. That combat, battelfield sowrdsmanship is very different. That's all fine and good. But one of the guys started to comment how Japan is the only country that has really preserved the battelfield arts as they were, altho he did concede that most of Kendo and Iaijutsu are also from the dueling periods of Japan's history. OK, so far, it's fine, and I may even agree with some of his points. But then he says that he has seen Chinese swordsmanship, and the most of what survives today as CMA swordsmanship is also derived from dueling and "civilian" style of weaponwork, and that practically no battelfield sowrdsmanship survives in the CMA. Mind you, he's not disparaging CMA swordwork, casue he admits that its very good at what it does, but that he made such a broad overarching comment was annoying. Especially since he has never studied CMA. It wasn't enough to irk me to the point where I needed to retort or defend CMA, and perhaps maybe even a few years ago I would have, but now, my friend and I just looked at each other and rolled our eyes and said nothing. I'm finding that I get annoyed at these things more and more, but feel the need to retort back less and less the more years I train. Kind of a contradiction, but...well, there it is.
Useless topic, but thought I'd vent.
I was working out with a bunch of guys of varied background, but mostly JMA people (that's who showed up yesterday). I was one of the two CMA guys there. The workout itself was good, we learned a lot, the fellows were actually really cool, nice, etc, and we were all good at what we do and overall the evening was a good one. HOWEVER, after workout, we did the standard cool down, stretch, and shoot the breeze the discuss MA. Eventually the topic turned to one of swordsmanship and fencing, and how fencing as we know of today is derived from dueling swordsmanship of the Renaissance and beyond. That combat, battelfield sowrdsmanship is very different. That's all fine and good. But one of the guys started to comment how Japan is the only country that has really preserved the battelfield arts as they were, altho he did concede that most of Kendo and Iaijutsu are also from the dueling periods of Japan's history. OK, so far, it's fine, and I may even agree with some of his points. But then he says that he has seen Chinese swordsmanship, and the most of what survives today as CMA swordsmanship is also derived from dueling and "civilian" style of weaponwork, and that practically no battelfield sowrdsmanship survives in the CMA. Mind you, he's not disparaging CMA swordwork, casue he admits that its very good at what it does, but that he made such a broad overarching comment was annoying. Especially since he has never studied CMA. It wasn't enough to irk me to the point where I needed to retort or defend CMA, and perhaps maybe even a few years ago I would have, but now, my friend and I just looked at each other and rolled our eyes and said nothing. I'm finding that I get annoyed at these things more and more, but feel the need to retort back less and less the more years I train. Kind of a contradiction, but...well, there it is.
Useless topic, but thought I'd vent.