WanderingMonk
01-18-2004, 08:05 PM
I like hear other people's thoughts on intellectual property rights in martial arts.
So, if you take kung-fu add some bjj to it, would it still be kung-fu?
Okaniwans took kung-fu add some of their te to it, but it is call okaniwan karate.
Japanese took okaniwan karate, took some materials out, and it became Japanese karate.
If you integrated groundwork materials into your striking, and grappling materials, why can't you claim it as your own and call it kung fu?
Why can Gracies take JJJ and modified it and then call it their own and hence Bjj or Gjj?
Who wrote the intellectual property right laws on martial arts and where can I get a copy?
discuss
wm
So, if you take kung-fu add some bjj to it, would it still be kung-fu?
Okaniwans took kung-fu add some of their te to it, but it is call okaniwan karate.
Japanese took okaniwan karate, took some materials out, and it became Japanese karate.
If you integrated groundwork materials into your striking, and grappling materials, why can't you claim it as your own and call it kung fu?
Why can Gracies take JJJ and modified it and then call it their own and hence Bjj or Gjj?
Who wrote the intellectual property right laws on martial arts and where can I get a copy?
discuss
wm