PDA

View Full Version : Man owns himself with samurai sword (vid)



IronFist
01-30-2004, 12:17 AM
Link (http://shadowdane.shackspace.com/Knives.mpeg). Right click save as. Home Shopping Network.

"That hurt big time!"

omg! :eek: :eek:

Liokault
01-30-2004, 03:56 AM
This has to be THE best link ever posted LOL:D

kungfudude14895
01-30-2004, 06:15 AM
this is the best thread ever!!!!!! omg i laughed on the floor for an hour!!!!! we should keep goin with this thread and stupid people doin that stuff, funny **** lol.:p

Shaolinlueb
01-30-2004, 06:51 AM
OMG that was funny.

and this is why you wear a seatbelt.
http://copywrite78.com/noseatbelt.avi



OUCH

Royal Dragon
01-30-2004, 07:24 AM
Did he clock himself in the nads with the handle?

I slow'moed it, and i can't see that he did anything to cause himself pain.

Looks like it bounced a bit harder than he anticipated, but the handle went into his gut, nothing that should have taken him out.

He's either a faker, or the biggest wuss on TV.

KWUsCRD
01-30-2004, 07:27 AM
^ The tip stuck him in the ribs.

Thank you IronFist, that definatly got a laugh outta me.

truewrestler
01-30-2004, 07:52 AM
yeah, the tip

...hey, I don't have sound... what is he saying? something about them being tough? what a piece of ****

Liokault
01-30-2004, 08:13 AM
...hey, I don't have sound... what is he saying? something about them being tough? what a piece of ****

Nope he says:

Owch...that hurts a lot.......ow that really hurts....really hurts etc.

Royal Dragon
01-30-2004, 08:39 AM
The TIP??? How?? It was facing the other way!

Royal Dragon
01-30-2004, 08:41 AM
I see it now!! The blade broke and bounced back at him!!!!!!

Gangsterfist
01-30-2004, 09:10 AM
Hmm that was a high quality blade.

Shaolinlueb
01-30-2004, 09:17 AM
gravity strikes again

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/nigel.simpson/clips/fall1.mpg

PHILBERT
01-30-2004, 09:27 AM
Geez that was funny. I kept rewinding it in class here and laughing. I wonder how many people continued purchasing those after they saw that.

truewrestler
01-30-2004, 09:32 AM
omg! That fall was horrible!

rubthebuddha
01-30-2004, 09:51 AM
at least she had padding. still, any one of those is enough to really spoil your morning. :(

KWUsCRD
01-30-2004, 11:26 AM
Originally posted by truewrestler
omg! That fall was horrible!

That's exactly what I thought heh

GeneChing
01-30-2004, 11:26 AM
See what you get with cheap samurai swords? Here's our new cheap samurai sword (http://store.yahoo.com/martialartsmart/3514.html) - it is an aluminum blade, but it shouldn't snap like that. That must have been straight up pot metal...

KC Elbows
01-30-2004, 11:41 AM
They just set the atomic clock by the interval between this thread being posted and Gene's plug.:D

PHILBERT
01-30-2004, 01:03 PM
Gene, it says on the side, 440 Stainless Steel. They are punch pressed, and that pretty much is what happens when hit against a strong, resisting object. Those are for decoration/wall mounting, not training.

Royal Dragon
01-30-2004, 01:14 PM
I have a few 440 Stainless blades, that I beat the snot out of with out a problem. These were less than 440. Maybe it was freakishly defective, I don't know. I wouldn't trust them in a sword against sword, especially if the other sword was ATS 34, or 1095, or something, but still 440 is not all that bad.

PHILBERT
01-30-2004, 01:17 PM
Royal Dragon, it says on the video that it is a 440 stainless steel. Funny part is that there was a life time warranty for it. 440 and 420 are known for there shattering. Not all do it, but alot do. My friend has one that he beats the crap out of, and it won't break. I've seen one, virtual identical, break. I also saw one, the blade broke off the handle (the pegs on the inside broke) and the blade itself shot out, but did not break. You could of picked it up and put it back in the handle and fixed it.

Gangsterfist
01-30-2004, 02:02 PM
He should have bought a sword from here:

http://www.thesteelsource.com/html/hanweiorchid.htm

Musicalkatachmp
01-30-2004, 02:32 PM
LOL that was the funniest thing ever...guys I know it is obvious but I just wanted to double check...was that for real or was it a joke can someone please tell me? thanks.

GunnedDownAtrocity
01-30-2004, 03:24 PM
twit on bike (http://users.1st.net/abaddon/twitonbike.mpeg)

Royal Dragon
01-30-2004, 03:28 PM
:eek:

norther practitioner
01-30-2004, 03:34 PM
LOL, those are good clips..

I found one that I'll post next week...

It has been around for a while, but it is one of the funniest things I've ever seen. It is out of Oregon, an exploding whale.... I almost pizzed myself.

Indestructible
01-30-2004, 03:41 PM
LoL at twit on bike!:)

Musicalkatachmp
01-30-2004, 08:34 PM
So what was the nice thing about those katana blades? He never finished telling us...

IronFist
01-31-2004, 12:49 AM
Originally posted by PHILBERT
I also saw one, the blade broke off the handle (the pegs on the inside broke) and the blade itself shot out, but did not break. You could of picked it up and put it back in the handle and fixed it.

^ That's dangerous. I heard about some kid or something who was impaled at a tournament by a sword that broke and the blade flew out. It wasn't even a sharp sword. I think they said the kid died.


twit on bike

omg!!! At first I thought his face hit the bricks, but I think his face may have actually landed in the grass or plants behind the bricks, so that's not quite as bad, unless there were spikey plants or something back there. Ouch!

BentMonk
01-31-2004, 05:30 AM
I wish I could've gotten it on vid, but this is still a good one. I had a friend who was a legend in his own mind. He spent more time talking about how hard he used to train than actually training. He was spinning a combat steel, surgically sharp katana. As he was showing off for the local pre-teens and enjoying their looks of awe, he drops the sword. It falls straight back on him, and pierces his side. It almost took out his liver. He ended up with a bunch of stitches, and one hell of a scar. It cut the shiat out of his obliques and such. It is true, God watches over the stupid. :D

GunnedDownAtrocity
01-31-2004, 12:56 PM
It is true, God watches over the stupid.

and luckily the kids that time as well.

backbreaker
01-31-2004, 02:34 PM
http://forum.kungfumagazine.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=28091

IronFist
01-31-2004, 03:15 PM
Oops, I didn't know it had already been posted.

anton
02-01-2004, 12:22 AM
owned by The Bruce (http://clientes.netvisao.pt/joaantlo/pwned.gif) :D

Chang Style Novice
02-01-2004, 12:42 AM
Excellent Franken!

IronFist
02-01-2004, 01:08 AM
^ lol @ the new word usage.

anton
02-01-2004, 09:02 PM
Janet Jackson gets owned by Justin Timberlake's kung fu (http://quickwired.com/janet_superbowl.avi)

IronFist
02-02-2004, 01:40 AM
^ lol he says it's costing him $20 a minute to host that movie :D

Evad
02-02-2004, 07:05 AM
Does anyone have a link to that ping pong act from some kinda Japanese variety show? The one I had saved doesn't work anymore. If anyone knows please post or send in a pm....thanks

kungfudude14895
02-02-2004, 07:48 AM
THAT WAS JUST AS FUNNY AS THE FIRST ONE!!!1

PHILBERT
02-02-2004, 09:27 AM
Was the Justin/Janet video up there the one where Justin ripped off her shirt? We were discussing it in my class today, but when I saw the half time show last night, I did not see it.

rubthebuddha
02-02-2004, 10:50 AM
evad -- in case no one links it, i have it saved. it's 3.41 megs, so ifyou have an e-mail account that handles larger attachments, i can do that, or just IM it to you.

CaptinPickAxe
02-02-2004, 01:35 PM
it was a big naked super bowl last night. Janets boobies, the streaker @ halftime...


Kung Fu Ping Pong can be found at Ebaumsworld.com

D_Messenger
02-02-2004, 08:13 PM
since the selling guy got hurt i think this fellow and his harmonica should substitute him from now on

its some 4mb some (http://louhi.kempele.fi/~skyostil/archive/dump/flash/yuri_harmonica.swf)

yutyeesam
02-02-2004, 10:52 PM
The brilliance of the katana breaking off into the guy video was when the second guy comes in to say, "We may need emergency surgery in the studio," a banner scrolls across the bottom part of the screen, gleefully saying, "We accept visa, mastercard, etc."

SevenStar
02-03-2004, 03:19 AM
Originally posted by PHILBERT
Was the Justin/Janet video up there the one where Justin ripped off her shirt? We were discussing it in my class today, but when I saw the half time show last night, I did not see it.

I saw it - while I can understand complaints, it wasn't as bad as everyone makes it seem - it was about a 3 second shot, and she had some type of glitter covering her nipple up - like a pasty or something. That link that was poster here isn't working for me though.

anton
02-03-2004, 04:06 AM
I believe the correct term is a nipple shield (https://webspace.utexas.edu/mgm55/jjtcloseup.jpg)

To tell you the truth I don't see how anyone could find a woman's breast offensive. You see people breastfeeding in public all the time.

rubthebuddha
02-03-2004, 11:51 AM
it's the united states, and we're offended by any sexuality that isn't deliberately thrust in our face. that was "accidental," and thus the FCC will get its panties in a bunch.

for most football fans i know, the only real complaint was that it was a twat like timberlake who got to do it.

Chang Style Novice
02-03-2004, 12:28 PM
This may come as a shock, but breasts - and for that matter nipples - have absolutely no sexual function whatsoever.

backbreaker
02-03-2004, 12:30 PM
Does Janet Jackson normally wear nipple covers? Or was it planned?

Meat Shake
02-03-2004, 12:32 PM
She always wears nipple covers due to the constant pulling off of her top. Happens everywhere the poor lady goes.

MasterKiller
02-03-2004, 12:33 PM
Originally posted by anton
I believe the correct term is a nipple shield Obviously, you don't know any strippers. It's called a pastie.

MasterKiller
02-03-2004, 12:37 PM
Originally posted by Chang Style Novice
This may come as a shock, but breasts - and for that matter nipples - have absolutely no sexual function whatsoever. Erogenous zones don't serve a sexual function? I'm guessing you don't have a girlfriend right now, huh? :D

Meat Shake
02-03-2004, 12:52 PM
I think he meant direct sexual function... In which case they are about as useful as the neck, ears, or back of the knees... Or any one of the many other E.Z.'s (no, not the restaraunt).
:rolleyes:

CaptinPickAxe
02-03-2004, 01:15 PM
thats a nipple ring...it has a stud going through the middle of it.

red5angel
02-03-2004, 01:20 PM
This may come as a shock, but breasts - and for that matter nipples - have absolutely no sexual function whatsoever.


I beg to differ, and so would some evolutionist as well.....

MasterKiller
02-03-2004, 01:23 PM
Originally posted by Meat Shake
I think he meant direct sexual function... In which case they are about as useful as the neck, ears, or back of the knees... Or any one of the many other E.Z.'s (no, not the restaraunt).
:rolleyes: Pinch mine and see if they don't have a direct sexual function. :eek:

anton
02-03-2004, 03:22 PM
Originally posted by MasterKiller
Obviously, you don't know any strippers. It's called a pastie.

Is that those things they stick on to the nipples? All the strippers I know end the show wearing nothing... the pastie isn't a big thing around these parts. What JJ had is another thing altogether. She was wearing one of these (http://www.andromeda-nyc.com/nipple2.html) - these babies are made of metal and specifically designed to beattached via piercing.

IronFist
02-03-2004, 03:38 PM
Um some chicks can have breast-only orgasms :eek:

IronFist
02-03-2004, 03:39 PM
Originally posted by anton
She was wearing one of these (http://www.andromeda-nyc.com/nipple2.html)

Oh man, look at the "Nipple Spike" at the bottom! :eek: :eek: :eek:

Chang Style Novice
02-03-2004, 10:40 PM
I wrote sexual function, not erotic function. My word choice was quite deliberate.

Communication is much more effective when you respond to what someone actually says instead of what you imagine them to say.

For the record, I like nipples (and playing with them, and stimulation of my own) as much as anyone.

IronFist
02-04-2004, 12:42 AM
Um, what exactly do you mean by "sexual" function?

Nipples are the medium through which milk is delivered. That's related to reproduction, which is kind of "sexual," yes?

( . )( . ) <----- hehe :p

Chang Style Novice
02-04-2004, 12:53 PM
http://news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,8579692%5E13762,00.html

B!tch was asking for it...

rubthebuddha
02-04-2004, 02:32 PM
csn -- you should choose terms other than "b!tch" when referring to a story about an altercation with female dog. a more specific term would have been "punk-ass b!tch."

regardless, i hope public ridicule continues. sad thing is, the cops seem hesitant to charge him, or are lacking a crime with which to charge him. :(

IronFist
02-04-2004, 02:52 PM
he said the dog was "acting sexy." :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:

lol wtf?????????????????????????????????????????

Chang Style Novice
02-04-2004, 05:01 PM
I think my favorite part of the story was the headline: "Dog Rape Attempt Goes Astray" Get it?! "A STRAY!" Like a STRAY DOG! HHAHAHAHAAHAAHAAHAA!

Ooh, I need a drink.

GeneChing
02-04-2004, 05:49 PM
...with nipple sheilds on the way. Sorry I'm late to this one, boys, I'm been busy. Those nipple shields remind me of these (http://store.martialartsmart.net/16-13.html) (time to set your atomic clock again). Man, now there's a market we need to explore, ninja nipple shields. If only I could get Janet to model....:p

As for 440 stainless steel, 440 is a hardness grade, we even sell some 440 stainless swords (http://store.martialartsmart.net/35-23.html). But realisitcally speaking, it's a hardness used for surgical steel, and not really relevant when your talking swords. Surgical steel, like scalpels, need to e extremely sharp of course, but the price of that sharpness is that they can also be brittle. For a scalpel, that's not a problem. For a sword, it is. This is not to say that 440 stainless doesn't make good sword steel, it may, but just because it's 440 doesn't speak to its flexibility. In essence, 440 could hold a great edge, but it might snap against a table. The funny thing is that the idea of 440 stainless being superior sword steel is so ingrained in the US sword buying market, that if it's 440, you got to state that as a sell point, even though it's not overly relevant to it's performance as a sword blade.

wushu chik
02-04-2004, 05:51 PM
Ninja Nipple Shields Gene??? That might almost be worth buying!!!

IronFist
02-04-2004, 07:51 PM
Originally posted by Chang Style Novice
I think my favorite part of the story was the headline: "Dog Rape Attempt Goes Astray" Get it?! "A STRAY!" Like a STRAY DOG! HHAHAHAHAAHAAHAAHAA!

LOL I didn't even notice that!!!!!

Serpent
02-04-2004, 09:33 PM
From here: (http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,8584109%255E13762,00.html)

Man marries dog for luck - then dies
From correspondents in Kathmandu
February 5, 2004

A 75-year-old man in Nepal married a dog in a local custom to ensure good luck only to die three days later, a newspaper reported Wednesday.

With his son and other relatives by his side, Phulram Chaudhary tied the knot with a dog Saturday in Durgauli village in the southwestern Kailali district.

He was following a custom of his Tharu community which holds that an old man who regrows teeth must take a dog as a bride.

"He believed that this would help him avoid great misfortune later in life. However, he died a few days afterward," the state-run daily Gorkhapatra said.

joedoe
02-04-2004, 09:37 PM
Well, that custom obviously doesn't work

Xebsball
02-04-2004, 09:48 PM
.

GeneChing
02-05-2004, 10:42 AM
Ninja Nipple Shields Gene??? That might almost be worth buying!!! wushu chik, you're a princess of the martial world when you say stuff like that. you go girl


btw, I was thinking of deleting the link earlier that actually showed Janet's offending teat, but then I harkened back to my cardinal rule about forum porn, that "this is a family show". Well, so is the superbowl. So now I don't know what the ethical call should be.

MasterKiller
02-05-2004, 10:51 AM
Gene,
The Superbowl didn't approve of the nipple display; hence the controversy. Janet added that into the act without the knowledge of the NFL. Because the SuperBowl is a family show, they never would have allowed it.

Gangsterfist
02-05-2004, 10:52 AM
Originally posted by GeneChing
wushu chik, you're a princess of the martial world when you say stuff like that. you go girl


btw, I was thinking of deleting the link earlier that actually showed Janet's offending teat, but then I harkened back to my cardinal rule about forum porn, that "this is a family show". Well, so is the superbowl. So now I don't know what the ethical call should be.

Yup, and Hooters is suppose to be a 'family' resturaunt......

Chang Style Novice
02-05-2004, 12:07 PM
Have I been stuttering or something? Let me break it down simply:

Tits are for kids!

wushu chik
02-05-2004, 12:09 PM
HAHA- Thanks Gene ;)

Well, honestly, I really didn't see anything wrong with it. Janet just ****ed in peoples cornflakes. That's all. It was an unexpected surprise, and the only reason people are ****ed is because they don't look as good as her at her age ;).

If you wanna talk "family shows", kids see MORE T & A on cartoons. It's your call Gene, but I really don't see much wrong with it. It's a breast, a glorified baby bottle. WTF CARES!!!

And as for Hooters? I don't see anything wrong with Hooters at all! I can see the same large breasted women walking around the mall in LESS than the girls at hooters! Jeez...people make this stuff sound like it's scandalous....when in fact, sex sells, and that's how the world goes. Get over it!

BentMonk
02-05-2004, 12:25 PM
Wushu Chik is officially my new hero :D Preach on sista preach on...amen :D

wushu chik
02-05-2004, 12:41 PM
LOFL, thanks BentMonk!

Seriously, as a female, I find nothing wrong with this stuff. Janet's posed nude a million times, bean bare chested (with the exception of some guys hands) on the cover of Rolling Stone Magazine, and if memory serves me correctly, I believe she posed for Playboy! Why does this really surprise everyone? It's not really a big deal!

I've worked at a strip club waiting tables (was pregnant and wasn't gonna strip ;)..) I've been to Hooters numerous times (the one in Long Beach used to have the BEST Buffalo wings) and I've gone to strip clubs NUMEROUS times with boyfriends I've had. The female body is NOTHING to be ashamed of, nor is it something to completely destroy a person's career about. Justin & Janet made a mistake that was completely within the realm of what we see on TV daily! Not only that, but it's not like they had the close up's that we see on the net of her breast with the nipple shield. It took like a second and a half for the cams to cut away!

People seriously need to get over it and move on. Go to Paris...you walk down the street and see their billboards of Nude women constantly! Who cares!

Chang Style Novice
02-05-2004, 01:00 PM
The conspiracy theorist in me says - hey, maybe she's trying to deflect some of the media heat away from her brother.

wushu chik
02-05-2004, 01:05 PM
Originally posted by Chang Style Novice
The conspiracy theorist in me says - hey, maybe she's trying to deflect some of the media heat away from her brother.

CSN you're not the only person that thinks that way!

GunnedDownAtrocity
02-05-2004, 01:06 PM
i doubt it man .... that wouldn't really work.

the two situations are way too different for it to make sense at all. i mean if he had gotten a dui or something it might work, but he's in a class all by himself at this point.

wushu chik
02-05-2004, 01:20 PM
LOL GDA-
That could be true, but you also have to think about the way the family is thinking. Desperate times call for desperate measures right? This could have been one way for maybe HER to help in some way!

Of course, it's just gonna make the whole family look MORE insane...if that's even possible ;)

MasterKiller
02-05-2004, 02:04 PM
Originally posted by wushu chik
I believe she posed for Playboy! Why does this really surprise everyone? It's not really a big deal!That was the nasty sister LaToya.


I've worked at a strip club waiting tables (was pregnant and wasn't gonna strip ;)..) That's what every ex-stripper says they did when people find out they used to work at a strip bar.


The female body is NOTHING to be ashamed of, nor is it something to completely destroy a person's career about. Nothing wrong with my wiener, either, but I doubt people want it bouncing around their TV screens while their kids are watching. If Justin had exposed himself, or even had a "sock" on, I doubt you would be singing "freedom" from the rooftops.


Justin & Janet made a mistake that was completely within the realm of what we see on TV daily!Mistake? It was a planned publicity stunt orchestrated without the knowledge of the people paying her to Lip Sync on TV.


Not only that, but it's not like they had the close up's that we see on the net of her breast with the nipple shield. It took like a second and a half for the cams to cut away! I saw it when it happened, and I couldn't tell she had a pastie on until everyone blew the picture up. It looked like a naked boob.


you walk down the street and see their billboards of Nude women constantly! Who cares! Women in Nigeria get stoned for sleeping around, too. Who Cares!

Individual countries have individual moralities, so bringing France into the equation is as stupid as me mentioning Nigeria. Here and now, in America, I don't particularly want my kids seeing Justin rip off Janet's bra and exposing her 40 year-old tit as he sings "I'll ave you naked by the end of this song." Within that context, they were not speaking about "glorified milk bottles."

It's bad enough you can't listen to the radio without being exposed to constant sexual language and profanity. Save the boob shots for HBO and late night MTV.

Gangsterfist
02-05-2004, 02:28 PM
MaterKiller-

All your points are good and valid, but they are still your opinion. You must realize your views are not the same as everyone else. Some parents may not have minded it, because their view is not to be ashamed of the human body. Obviously that is not yours, and you have the absolute right to raise your kids how you see fit; and I respect that right.

Sex and violence sells. It is part of our society today. Whether you like it or not its here to stay. Do you think kids would play video games that did not have action/violence/sexual content? Probably not. Same goes for movies, books, etc etc.

If you don't like something then don't watch it.

Now the superbowl is suppose to be a family event to watch. So I say the whole event might have been distasteful. Hooters is suppose to be a family resturaunt, and it clearly protrays women as objects. People still take their families there. So there are grey lines in certain situations.

MasterKiller
02-05-2004, 02:39 PM
Originally posted by Gangsterfist
If you don't like something then don't watch it.I'm all for that. Tell me your gonna show your tit on TV, and I'll turn the channel when my kids are in the room. Especially when it's exposed in a sexual and almost violently suggestive way.


So there are grey lines in certain situations. True. But everyone knows what a Hooters is before they take their kids in. That's a personal choice. I didn't know Janet was gonna expose herself, and I'd rather not have my 8 year-old daughter see women treated like that if I can avoid it.

FWIW, I didn't appreciate Nelly's croch rubbing either.


Sex and violence sells. It is part of our society today. Whether you like it or not its here to stay. Do you think kids would play video games that did not have action/violence/sexual content? Probably not. Same goes for movies, books, etc etc. I'm not gonna go off on a tangent here, because really I'm no angel myself. I have 2 girls that I feel shouldn't be exposed to certain things at their young age. BUT...just because violence and sex sell doesn't mean it should be marketed to kids.

Meat Shake
02-05-2004, 02:44 PM
Ok... But its ok for them to talk about 4 hour erections?
This **** is driving me nuts. How in the fizucking hizell can you ***** about a tit, but not be enraged about commercials of old men throwing footballs through a tire and talking about 4 hour erections!???
Yes, the tire may be over the heads of 8 most year olds, but Im sure there are quite a few that understood the innuendo perfectly.

Edit: Nelly gets my respect cause he was the only one not lip synching.
Other than that, all of the artists in the halftime show sucked. Nelly sucks too, he just gets credit for actually singing.

MasterKiller
02-05-2004, 02:46 PM
I didn't see any cocks bouncing around my screen, and I can easily explain why men need medicine. What I can't explain is why women choose to portray themselves as sexual victims when I'm trying to instill in these girls a little self-respect.


Nelly WAS lip syncing, there bronco. Kid Rock actually used his own voice.

Meat Shake
02-05-2004, 02:48 PM
"just because violence and sex sell doesn't mean it should be marketed to kids."

In the current national market, the tween group (ages 9-13) are the ones who make most of the house hold purchasing decisions. Parents bend and sway to their nagging wants. Ill dig up the link if you want...
So, in a way, marketing said violence and sex to children would be more or less milking the largest portion of the market.
Wrong? To most people.
Does it happen, and will it continue to happen? Unquestionably.

wushu chik
02-05-2004, 02:50 PM
Originally posted by MasterKiller
That's what every ex-stripper says they did when people find out they used to work at a strip bar.

HAHAHA- Actually, that was a good one!! I had several chances to strip, but didn't take them up on the offer. I waited tables, and 2 of my best friends worked there. And most strippers I know have always been MORE THEN HAPPY to let people know they were strippers. Why?? Because they don't feel that the human body is ANYTHING to be ashamed of.


Nothing wrong with my wiener, either, but I doubt people want it bouncing around their TV screens while their kids are watching. If Justin had exposed himself, or even had a "sock" on, I doubt you would be singing "freedom" from the rooftops.

I personally don't care either way. Red Hot Chili Peppers got away with it, why can't you or Justin?? And RHCP did it LIVE!


It's bad enough you can't listen to the radio without being exposed to constant sexual language and profanity. Save the boob shots for HBO and late night MTV.

But it's not just HBO and late nite MTV. It's constant. You have cartoons and kids movies that have CONSTANT SEXUAL INUENDOS in them. Yeah, kids may not understand them, but adults sure can.

I'm sorry that I struck a nerve, again it's JUST MY OPINION. As yours is yours. I do agree with many comments that you made, as well as I stand by mine. I do not feel that it was such a HUGE deal that they're making out of it. Bono said the F word on tv, and everyone and their brother came unglued. Nobody's perfect, and when the world starts to figure that out, it'll only get better from there!!!

Meat Shake
02-05-2004, 02:52 PM
"What I can't explain is why women choose to portray themselves as sexual victims when I'm trying to instill in these girls a little self-respect."


Victim????
You mean exhibitionist?

If its that easy to explain medicine, it should be easy to explain personal decisions and career choices, and that a human body is a beautiful thing, not the sin filled lust bubble that the strongly christian nation makes it out to be.
Look at michael angelo's scupture. Its a naked man. Its in the name of art, music is art, inadvertantly janet jacksons breast can be viewed as such.
Your glass is either half full, or half empty.

****... Its 4. Im off, Ill check this thread later.
Peaceout.
:)

MasterKiller
02-05-2004, 02:53 PM
Originally posted by Meat Shake
Does it happen, and will it continue to happen? Unquestionably. Doesn't make it right.

wushu chik
02-05-2004, 02:54 PM
Originally posted by MasterKiller
I didn't see any cocks bouncing around my screen, and I can easily explain why men need medicine. What I can't explain is why women choose to portray themselves as sexual victims when I'm trying to instill in these girls a little self-respect.


Nelly WAS lip syncing, there bronco. Kid Rock actually used his own voice.

I agree 1000000% about instilling self-respect into your girls, and I commend you for that, since a lot of parents don't do that. IMHO, when it comes to explaining why these women choose to portray themselves like this, I would just tell them it's because that's how THEY choose to get attention, but you feel it's wrong. It's hard to find good parents now adays MK, and I think it's great that you're looking out for your girls.

There are MANY things I will not allow my boys to watch or listen to. My worry is that they'll grow up looking at the pop culture morons and think that's HOW they're supposed to treat women, but then it comes back to the parents to teach them right from wrong, and as long as you're doing that....there's not much more you CAN do!

MasterKiller
02-05-2004, 02:56 PM
Victim????
You mean exhibitionist? SHE DIDN't expose herself--he ripped her clothes off, and she stood their "stunned." That's not exhibitionist, it was rape fantasy.


If its that easy to explain medicine, it should be easy to explain personal decisions and career choices, and that a human body is a beautiful thing, not the sin filled lust bubble that the strongly christian nation makes it out to be.I agree. But there is also negative sexual imagery. I mean, my girls are beautiful, but that doesn't mean 8 year-olds should be paraded naked on TV.


Look at michael angelo's scupture. Its a naked man. Its in the name of art, music is art, inadvertantly janet jacksons breast can be viewed as such.
Your glass is either half full, or half empty.Context. It's all about context.

anton
02-05-2004, 03:15 PM
In Australia they were still showing unblurred footage of the event on daytime tv a couple of days ago, even after all the outrage in the US. I still don't get what the big deal is. It's pretty common to go to the beach and see topless women. Its not uncommon to see women breast-feeding in public. Kids in some parts of Africa and South America grow up from childhood seeing men and women of all ages completely naked, and it doesn't seem to do them any harm. Personally I think the attitude that children should not be allowed to see a breast is far more likely to cause them to have unhealthy attitudes to parts of the human body and sexuality then one saggy old boobn could ever do.
I do see your point about violent imagery, but I still think that's a rather long bow to draw.

rubthebuddha
02-05-2004, 03:24 PM
i think a lot of it is about expectation in the first place. you watch NYPD blue, you know what it's about, and they warn you that certain things will be shown. you watch the superbowl, you expect football and all that goes along with it. you see a halftime show, and you expect ****ing crappy music and retarded performances. those, we got, but we also got the unexpected -- boob. not just is it unexpected, it's expected to NOT be there.

for the record, it wasn't a pasty, either. it was a piercing that only hid the areola, not the nip. regardless, it didn't matter. the networks have specific guidelines, and one of the reasons to rehearse (other than practice) is to give other people a chance to critique. jackson and timberlake added that piece in at the last minute, thus deviating from behavior that was already approved. any fault lies specifically with them, and i wouldn't be disappointed if criminal or civil charges were brought.

sounds prissy, i know, but if i ripped my girlfriend's shirt in public and booby fell out, i could get charged if one person saw it. now if 100 million saw it?

of course, then that begs the question of how many people actually pay attention to the halftime show? the same 100 million? not bloody likely.

wushu chik
02-05-2004, 03:33 PM
Originally posted by backbreaker
J Timberlay wanted the attention on him and not the game. I wouldn't be surprsed if MTV knew about it and contrived that to attract all the teens to watch more MTV

OH WHATEVER....

Seriously, you think MTV would wanna lose a gig like that? Highly unlikely. And to say that Justin wanted the attention on him...where do you get your info? Talk to him on the phone recently???

Chang Style Novice
02-05-2004, 03:43 PM
GDA - I agree that Wacko Jacko is in a class by himself when it comes to berzerk celebs, but let me ask you this - have you seen him on the news since last Sunday?

CaptinPickAxe
02-05-2004, 03:45 PM
*Meat Shake Speaking*

"SHE DIDN't expose herself--he ripped her clothes off, and she stood their "stunned." That's not exhibitionist, it was rape fantasy."


She did expose herself. It was planned, and quite obviously so. It was a "tear away" top, otherwise the whole top would have gone and she would have been chaffed by the outfit.


"Context. It's all about context."

Context can be percieved, thus intrapersonally changed from positive from negative.
:p

Chang Style Novice
02-05-2004, 03:53 PM
The fact that it was clearly a pre-planned performance doesn't change the fact that it was also clearly a rape fantasy.

Serpent
02-05-2004, 04:57 PM
For ****'s sake, it was just a tit!

rubthebuddha
02-05-2004, 05:12 PM
actually, as was discussed in a different thread, a tit isn't required to do anything for ****'s sake. ;)

not like it was a fantastic boob, either.

@PLUGO
02-05-2004, 06:01 PM
I wonder if J.J used that 440 steal sword for her piercing . . .

GeneChing
02-05-2004, 06:13 PM
delete the teat?

I can always go back and change that link to www.martialartsmart.com ;)

anton
02-05-2004, 06:19 PM
No, theres nothing inherently offensive about a breast. But if the puritans win, then change it to a martialartsmart link.

joedoe
02-05-2004, 06:23 PM
The generally puritanical attitude of the US always amazes me. I mean, I believe in a basic level of decency but surely there is nothing wrong with someone briefly baring a breast (like my alliteration? :)). Men are allowed to walk around in public without a shirt, so why is it so bad for women to do the same? ;)

CaptinPickAxe
02-05-2004, 06:50 PM
Janet was obviously going for a publicity stunt. When Brittany's record sales dropped what did she do? Had a "slip-up" during a Teen's Choice Award. And in my opinion, thats a lot worse than Super Bowl. I doesn't make it right, but you are attacking the lesser of two evils. Either a bunch of prepubecents watching their idol bare herself for publicity, or a bunch of old men watching a washed up pop diva trying to regain a shred of her former greatness. What will have a more devestating effect on our youth? I'll let you be the judge...

Vash
02-05-2004, 07:26 PM
Originally posted by Chang Style Novice
This may come as a shock, but breasts - and for that matter nipples - have absolutely no sexual function whatsoever.

They don't hurt nothin', though.

GunnedDownAtrocity
02-05-2004, 07:27 PM
cns ....
GDA - I agree that Wacko Jacko is in a class by himself when it comes to berzerk celebs, but let me ask you this - have you seen him on the news since last Sunday?

i dunno ... i get all my news from various forums. that said ... point.


everyone .....
masterkiller is a stupid puritan punk ass ***** afraid of the beautiful female body and her right to expose it whenever the time seems appropriate to her.

ok .... i think anyone who's read a single post of mine can guess which side of the fence i stand on, but i don't like seeing mk fight this fight alone. he never said his kid was traumatized or that he was taking her to counseling because she saw a booby. he didn't even say that it was the worst thing that she was exposed to that day. he did say that it was wrong for janet and that one guy to intentionally do something like that at a completely inappropriate time. america bash the issue all you want but the fact remains that america doesn't currently want boobies in that context on prime time tv. had it happened at the mtv music awards fine, but it wasn't the mtv music awards and they both were well aware of the audience they were entertaining. it's no what they did, it's when and how they did it.

GunnedDownAtrocity
02-05-2004, 07:29 PM
cpa ...
Janet was obviously going for a publicity stunt.

if i said janet ... in any context ... and was referring to janet jackson then it obvisouly worked.

Serpent
02-05-2004, 08:33 PM
Every time your president appears on TV, be it prime time or otherwise, you're looking at the biggest tit in the world.

Why does no one insist that he gets censored!?

Chang Style Novice
02-05-2004, 08:40 PM
I think MK is right on the money (shot.)

The issue, as far as I'm concerned, isn't the bare breast on TV, but the how and why and where and when of the bare breast on TV. I didn't watch the game (football bores me), but I'll betcha anything that there was plenty of scheduled, approved T&A in the vast array of commercials aired during it. I'll even bet lots of them were in tiny, skimpy bikini tops or super-low cut cleavagadelic necklines. Looked at from that persective, one more mammary isn't that big a deal. The sweater mitten in question wasn't even much more bare than your average beach-fantasy beer commercial hooter. The big difference is that it was revealed by a grabby guy pulling the woman's clothes off. Ergo, rape fantasy. If it was truly a mere "wardrobe malfunction" there would be much less uproar. But that's not what happened - what happened was a violent sexual objectification of a body part. THAT'S what inappropriate for kids, not the mere fact of boobies.

Xebsball
02-05-2004, 08:48 PM
once upona time there was a thread about a fool stabbing himself witha crappy katana


you guys should no worries
believe me,
every year on carnival i can turn on my tv on any open channel and see free boobs, g-strings... all on parade :D
its been like this for years and years, ever since i was a kid i liked carnival
and look at me now today at adult age -> a perfectly healthy body/mind this grown man posesses!!!! :)

joedoe
02-05-2004, 08:55 PM
Originally posted by Xebsball
once upona time there was a thread about a fool stabbing himself witha crappy katana


you guys should no worries
believe me,
every year on carnival i can turn on my tv on any open channel and see free boobs, g-strings... all on parade :D
its been like this for years and years, ever since i was a kid i liked carnival
and look at me now today at adult age -> a perfectly healthy body/mind this grown man posesses!!!! :)

All that and you still can't get laid!!! :D :D

Just kidding Xebby

Chang Style Novice
02-05-2004, 09:10 PM
"and look at me now today at adult age -> a perfectly healthy body/mind this grown man posesses!!!! "

I'd take this a lot more seriously if you didn't have a giant font sig-line saying "my peepee is an instrument to god's wrath."

Xebsball
02-05-2004, 09:21 PM
ok, i was joking on the body/mind part :D

i intend, if necessary within the next 2 months max, use my peepees divine power on prostitutes to free them from the burden of the worlds older and most devilish profession... stuff

MasterKiller
02-06-2004, 07:23 AM
everyone .....
masterkiller is a stupid puritan punk ass ***** afraid of the beautiful female body and her right to expose it whenever the time seems appropriate to her. Which one of you punk muther****ers said this and then didn't have the nuts to leave it up overnight? The problem there, is that APPROPRIATE to her may not be APPROPRIATE for the audience. Context.

And if you think I'm puritanical, you OBVIOUSLY haven't read my book. Neither have my kids. So before you go spouting off about people you know NOTHING about from the safety of your mommy's house, maybe you should do some research. Cocsucker.


The generally puritanical attitude of the US always amazes me. I mean, I believe in a basic level of decency but surely there is nothing wrong with someone briefly baring a breast (like my alliteration? ). Men are allowed to walk around in public without a shirt, so why is it so bad for women to do the same?It's not bad. In fact, it's not bad to show a man's *****. However, it is bad for a man to walk around jerking himself in public. Context.

I have no problem with a woman showing her body in the right context. I have no problem with exposing my girls to sex in the right context. But I refuse to expose them to indecent acts that show women in degrading and subserviant roles. It's hard enough battling fashion magazines and the anorexic actresses on "Friends" to instill a little self-esteem into them.

BentMonk
02-06-2004, 08:00 AM
Mk - I have kids too. Two girls 4 & 10, two boys 6 & 11. I understand where you're coming from. You obviously grasp the point that most do not. It is THE PARENT'S responsibility to monitor what their kids do or do not see. The SuperBowl halftime show has gotten a little racier every year. All the hoopla just gives Janet a lot of free publicity. She freely admits it was her idea, and everyone else was clueless. Do I think Timberlake was in the dark? Not hardly. Still, charge Jackson with indecent exposure and move on. Rather people are offended by her, or could care less, for the whole country to be so up in arms about this is silly. I didn't even watch the Superbowl, but from what I've heard and seen so far the boob shot was more like a second and a half flash. In bad taste? Probably. Worth the whole country making such a fuss over? Not even. I respect your views MK and realize you're looking out for your kids. The fact still remains that this kind of stuff shows no signs of going away. Your kids have you looking out for them, mine have me. I think that's all they'll need to be just fine. I'm not going to expect the whole country to quit doing something just because I worry about what they might see or hear. I'm just going to teach them what's right and what's not, do my best to be there for them, and trust that thet're listening. So far they've shown me that they listen a lot more than I sometimes think. My 10 year old daughter thought what Janet did was tacky. She didn't actually see it, but after hearing about it at school, she formed her own oppinion. The world is wierd and getting wierder, but I think as long as parents do their job, the kids will be just fine. I still admire Wushu Chik's bluntness. Just out of curiosity Wushu Chik, would your oppinions change if you had kids?

MasterKiller
02-06-2004, 08:10 AM
WushuChik has boys, I think. I respect her opinion because she does have kids. But I'm betting that she teaches them to not pull out their ******s in public. I'm also betting the loudmouths spouting about freedom of expression don't have any kids.

And Meat, you're a cool guy and all, but trying to tell me how to talk to my kids when you don't have any is like someone trying to teach you kung fu when they've never had a single lesson. Unless you pulled an 8-mile and raised your sister from birth because your mom was on crack, in which case, I'd say Janet's tit is the least of your problems.

GeneChing
02-06-2004, 10:27 AM
...sometimes you gotta stop and look at yourself in the mirror and wonder about the martial company you keep.

once upona time there was a thread about a fool stabbing himself witha crappy katana :p

wushu chik
02-06-2004, 11:47 AM
I still admire Wushu Chik's bluntness. Just out of curiosity Wushu Chik, would your oppinions change if you had kids?


WushuChik has boys, I think. I respect her opinion because she does have kids. But I'm betting that she teaches them to not pull out their ******s in public. I'm also betting the loudmouths spouting about freedom of expression don't have any kids.

I have 2 boys, 6 & 4. My opinions are like they are probably because of the way I was raised. My grandparents never witheld anything from me. I was allowed to watch whatever I wanted & all questions were answered, and not in a round about way. They wanted to be sure that I wasn't naive or I'd be utterly surprised or apauled by what I see or hear as I get older.

Case in point, my neighbor. Stunning redhead, small, petite, school teacher, very nice. She came over to tutor my 6 year old and there was a Surfing Magazine on the table opened to a page with a girl in a bikini. She started blushing, covered her mouth and closed the book, talking about how it leads to pornography etc.

My boys are VERY openminded and don't have any problems coming right out and asking a question, or expressing their opinions (wonder where they get that huh??).

AS A PARENT- I feel that it is my "job" to make sure my kids are ready for anything, and know the boundaries of life. They know where I stand in my points, and how I feel about certain areas of daily life. I do teach them the rights and wrongs, like MK said. My boys know that whipping it out in public is a BIG no no, just like many other things.

Josh, my 6 year old, saw Janets top get yanked off on the SBHT Show, and all he said was "Why'd he pull her top off, that was rude" & "That's gonna cost some bucks to get fixed."

Bodhi, my 4 year old, could have cared less. At his age, he's pretty oblivious to stuff like that! He's more worried about his coloring books and Xbox.


...sometimes you gotta stop and look at yourself in the mirror and wonder about the martial company you keep.

Sorry Gene, leave it to us to hijack, turn around, completely change the subject, then argue on a thread!! BUT- you know that's what you love about us the most!!!! That's why we have an off topic forum at Fu-Ragz (http://www.team-fu.com). (See look at how much you've already taught me!!! But that what ELDER Kung Fu Bro's are for!!:p )

~Wen~

GunnedDownAtrocity
02-06-2004, 12:28 PM
i agree with wushu's entire post 100%

this is exactly how i raise my daughter simply because i'm not capable of doing it any other way.

some people find that i'm way too honest with her, about anything and everything, but i could give a **** less and i completely respect another parent's right to do it differantly.

GeneChing
02-06-2004, 01:28 PM
...but there are definate boundaries. I'm as open with my child as I can be, but there are definately some things I shield her from at this point. You gotta remember, I live near SF, so when we talk about porn, perversion, etc., it can be very extreme, stuff that is too much for me as an adult.

Anyway, right now we're working on learning sword etiquette because I have a lot of sharps lying about and many of my kid's classmates are in this heavy sword phase. Good sowrd etiquette would have prevented this whole thread, because slapping a sword on the table is just rude. He got what he deserved. Of course, none of mine would break like that (well, maybe my light saber might...)

CaptinPickAxe
02-06-2004, 01:35 PM
"Its very durable"
Irony bares its ugly face in the worst times, but chances are it will make for a good laugh.

GunnedDownAtrocity
02-06-2004, 02:04 PM
maybe there will be less rednecks with big sharp knives because of that mishap.

apoweyn
02-06-2004, 02:46 PM
Attachment: ownedbrucelee.jpg
This has been downloaded 27 time(s).

You know that's Jackie Chan, right?

wushu chik
02-06-2004, 04:02 PM
OK, now i've seen just about everything...

Janet & Justin, MTV, CBS & Viacom Get sued! (http://story.news.yahoo.com/fc?cid=34&tmpl=fc&in=Entertainment&cat=Super_Bowl_Halftime_Show)

@PLUGO
02-06-2004, 04:19 PM
Justin Timberlake steps back clutching part of Janet Jackson's bodice in his hand during 'Nipplegate.' Timberlake said he had been 'shocked' and 'embarrassed' during the incident

Nausa sets in . . .:rolleyes:

CaptinPickAxe
02-06-2004, 04:23 PM
I'm sueing TrimSpa for exposing me to Anna Nicole's fat ass.










Its TrimSpa, Baby!
Shut up and eat a twinkie, ho.