mantis108
02-09-2004, 05:15 PM
Some thoughts on Sifu Cottrells posts, which I find very informative and detail. I have some thoughts which I would like to share:
<<<Tanglang, as I learned it has five internal and five external elements that work together throughout one's training.
Internal Elements: (briefly)
Jing (essence)those energies and attributes you are born with. It can be depleated through poor living practices and should be conserved. >>>
The phonetic "Jing" can represent 2 different concepts in Chinese. One is essence as discuss above, which is conventional explanation. Kai Uwe Pel's definitation is mental level that is different from the conventional thoughts IMHO. Jing can also represent the word power generation as in Fa Jing.
<<<Shen (spirit) mind attitude and more too complex for brief treatment.>>>
It could also be understood as perceptual faculties. Intuition, for example, is one of Shen's functions.
<<<Chi (I think we all got this one)>>>
I think I will address this one later. Shen, Chi/Qi and Jing are essentially the same thing.
<<<Li (physical strength and endurance) can be increased>>>
I would agree with this and I would like to address this later.
<<<Gong (Acquired ability through specialized training) all the aforementioned elements manifest themselves in the development of this one.>>>
Agreed.
<<<Jing/shen is often represented by moral rules of conduct to prevent dissapating one's energies in wasteful activity.>>>
Jing Shen is also a description of the condition a person is in. Hao Jing Shen means someone is in good (perceivable) condition mainly with good emotional state or the person feels physically capable. This is believe to be achievable by observing disciplined life style.
<<<Jing in terms of martial power would be a gong. So would be strength of stance.>>>
this I would like to address later.
<<<These are not levels of training or sophistication of technique. Nor are they represented by different styles of Tanglang. They are present in all. In fact, like the eighteen families, these five internal and external are taught in other styles of Gongfu. In fact, every style of Gongfu has these as they are attributes of Gongfu practitioners.>>>
I agreed with this observation. But at the same time, I have a different view, a different understanding if you will, about the relationships of these things and the relationship between Qi, Li and Jing.
<<<What may be different in different styles is the reilance on hard and soft technique. Qixing is said to be the hardest of the Tanglang styles. Having said that it must also be said that Qixing is not necessarily the most external, (uses the most li/ strength). That is the development of the individual. Hard is not external, soft is not necessarily internal. Practitioners like Adam Hsu, who studied Meihua Tanglang, says that Tanglang can be as internal as any other system, (rely on Qi and Jing (martial power) instead of Li). It is the development of the individual.>>>
I bascially agreed with this in most part. Hard expression or soft expression is indeed a stylistic signature (energy wise) but not necessarily constitute an external or internal art.
<<<High level practitioners of any style will use more Qi/jing (martial power). Low level practitioners will use more Li, (car pushing muscles). >>>
I actually would prefer "aware" instead of "use".
<<<"It is essential to develop all areas of the five internal however as they support each other. Greater Qi means better support for the system that provides oxygen to the muscles enabling one to exercise and develop one's Li. Developing one's Li, for example better muscular endurance, means the fighter can perform tasks using martial power (Jing) for longer periods. Good living to preserve one's overall constitution, (Jing/Shen) and proper martial spirit/ attitude are essential for the fighter.>>>
Kung Fu is a process IMHO. This statement is a good illustration of such process. I would use a different model of explanation, or my understanding if you will, which I would like to share later.
<<<I do not believe that we oppose each other in viewing the essentials of this but we do contrast in how we interpret them.>>>
I think all the elements that we use are presented and similar. Just the interpertations differ from each other's. I will present my understanding in the following post.
Thank you for sharing a very informative and detailed post, Sifu Cottrell.
Warm regards
Robert Hui (Mantis108)
<<<Tanglang, as I learned it has five internal and five external elements that work together throughout one's training.
Internal Elements: (briefly)
Jing (essence)those energies and attributes you are born with. It can be depleated through poor living practices and should be conserved. >>>
The phonetic "Jing" can represent 2 different concepts in Chinese. One is essence as discuss above, which is conventional explanation. Kai Uwe Pel's definitation is mental level that is different from the conventional thoughts IMHO. Jing can also represent the word power generation as in Fa Jing.
<<<Shen (spirit) mind attitude and more too complex for brief treatment.>>>
It could also be understood as perceptual faculties. Intuition, for example, is one of Shen's functions.
<<<Chi (I think we all got this one)>>>
I think I will address this one later. Shen, Chi/Qi and Jing are essentially the same thing.
<<<Li (physical strength and endurance) can be increased>>>
I would agree with this and I would like to address this later.
<<<Gong (Acquired ability through specialized training) all the aforementioned elements manifest themselves in the development of this one.>>>
Agreed.
<<<Jing/shen is often represented by moral rules of conduct to prevent dissapating one's energies in wasteful activity.>>>
Jing Shen is also a description of the condition a person is in. Hao Jing Shen means someone is in good (perceivable) condition mainly with good emotional state or the person feels physically capable. This is believe to be achievable by observing disciplined life style.
<<<Jing in terms of martial power would be a gong. So would be strength of stance.>>>
this I would like to address later.
<<<These are not levels of training or sophistication of technique. Nor are they represented by different styles of Tanglang. They are present in all. In fact, like the eighteen families, these five internal and external are taught in other styles of Gongfu. In fact, every style of Gongfu has these as they are attributes of Gongfu practitioners.>>>
I agreed with this observation. But at the same time, I have a different view, a different understanding if you will, about the relationships of these things and the relationship between Qi, Li and Jing.
<<<What may be different in different styles is the reilance on hard and soft technique. Qixing is said to be the hardest of the Tanglang styles. Having said that it must also be said that Qixing is not necessarily the most external, (uses the most li/ strength). That is the development of the individual. Hard is not external, soft is not necessarily internal. Practitioners like Adam Hsu, who studied Meihua Tanglang, says that Tanglang can be as internal as any other system, (rely on Qi and Jing (martial power) instead of Li). It is the development of the individual.>>>
I bascially agreed with this in most part. Hard expression or soft expression is indeed a stylistic signature (energy wise) but not necessarily constitute an external or internal art.
<<<High level practitioners of any style will use more Qi/jing (martial power). Low level practitioners will use more Li, (car pushing muscles). >>>
I actually would prefer "aware" instead of "use".
<<<"It is essential to develop all areas of the five internal however as they support each other. Greater Qi means better support for the system that provides oxygen to the muscles enabling one to exercise and develop one's Li. Developing one's Li, for example better muscular endurance, means the fighter can perform tasks using martial power (Jing) for longer periods. Good living to preserve one's overall constitution, (Jing/Shen) and proper martial spirit/ attitude are essential for the fighter.>>>
Kung Fu is a process IMHO. This statement is a good illustration of such process. I would use a different model of explanation, or my understanding if you will, which I would like to share later.
<<<I do not believe that we oppose each other in viewing the essentials of this but we do contrast in how we interpret them.>>>
I think all the elements that we use are presented and similar. Just the interpertations differ from each other's. I will present my understanding in the following post.
Thank you for sharing a very informative and detailed post, Sifu Cottrell.
Warm regards
Robert Hui (Mantis108)