Kennyfist
03-16-2004, 11:09 PM
Videos and books again?
I know this has been discussed before but after reading some threads and replies lets analyse this again:
Weighing the pro's and cons of kungfu videos:
1) Some will use it to learn the form....I heard some then open a school and teach
2) Some will use it as a learning tool to help remember what they've learnt.
3) Some will use it for research purpose ie compare lineages and similarities and differences between each generation or lineage.
4) Some may be just curious to see what the style is like and the particular lineage/ sifu.
5) Some will use it to glean a few gems here and there ( hey Gene, you might advocate this one )
6) Some might see it as a way to preserve or document the sets or style for future generations or reference ( How many styles have died out or loss content due to cultural revolution and wushu-ization------and wouldn't you wonder what Ku Yu Cheung, Wan Lai sheng, Yang Shao Hou, Wong Fei Hung, Lam Sai Wing , Sun Lu Tang etc looked like when they did forms?----so why not capture the sifu in action and take advantage of technology since we've got it?) Would you agree that video is a livelier way to document then photos/book?
But..........
1) How many sifus would put their best in a commercial video...
2) Some say or rumour videos have been intentionally marked or sets altered to distinguish "video" students from "real" students..
3) Then we have to allow for mistakes made by editor, performer etc.
4 ) What if the sets have elements withheld or the performer has fake lineage or false claim----I won't name an example but suspect in PRC one set of vcds at least)
Now......
1) Those of you who want to learn from video------- if there are things withheld ----- then you are not potentially getting the full thing. So you need personal instruction--- but hey, if they were available readily then why bother get the videos in the first place?
And those performers ---why advertise "learn X or Y" from this video etc. ?
I know this has been discussed before but after reading some threads and replies lets analyse this again:
Weighing the pro's and cons of kungfu videos:
1) Some will use it to learn the form....I heard some then open a school and teach
2) Some will use it as a learning tool to help remember what they've learnt.
3) Some will use it for research purpose ie compare lineages and similarities and differences between each generation or lineage.
4) Some may be just curious to see what the style is like and the particular lineage/ sifu.
5) Some will use it to glean a few gems here and there ( hey Gene, you might advocate this one )
6) Some might see it as a way to preserve or document the sets or style for future generations or reference ( How many styles have died out or loss content due to cultural revolution and wushu-ization------and wouldn't you wonder what Ku Yu Cheung, Wan Lai sheng, Yang Shao Hou, Wong Fei Hung, Lam Sai Wing , Sun Lu Tang etc looked like when they did forms?----so why not capture the sifu in action and take advantage of technology since we've got it?) Would you agree that video is a livelier way to document then photos/book?
But..........
1) How many sifus would put their best in a commercial video...
2) Some say or rumour videos have been intentionally marked or sets altered to distinguish "video" students from "real" students..
3) Then we have to allow for mistakes made by editor, performer etc.
4 ) What if the sets have elements withheld or the performer has fake lineage or false claim----I won't name an example but suspect in PRC one set of vcds at least)
Now......
1) Those of you who want to learn from video------- if there are things withheld ----- then you are not potentially getting the full thing. So you need personal instruction--- but hey, if they were available readily then why bother get the videos in the first place?
And those performers ---why advertise "learn X or Y" from this video etc. ?