PaulH
03-25-2004, 10:49 AM
Canglong,
I was greatly amused on your cat koan's post. Here is the western logical answer to it from my viewpoint. One of the monks should had said to the catkiller wannabe: "Thou shall kill the cat!" This will cause a logical contradition if one insisted on killing the cat. I should have been there in the temple! Ha! Ha! Good discussion on the nature of the koan though! I find it has a very good insight on WC philosophical approach - the middle road where there is no right and no wrong.
Regards,
PH
P.S As to why the sandals on the head as you walk away. My thinking is walking barefooted balancing sandals on your head makes no noise and have a connotation of giving up prior claim which is pertinent to the idea of giving up ownership claim of the cat. The case is only valid if there are two people disputing it. Hence walk silently away and there will be no case.
I was greatly amused on your cat koan's post. Here is the western logical answer to it from my viewpoint. One of the monks should had said to the catkiller wannabe: "Thou shall kill the cat!" This will cause a logical contradition if one insisted on killing the cat. I should have been there in the temple! Ha! Ha! Good discussion on the nature of the koan though! I find it has a very good insight on WC philosophical approach - the middle road where there is no right and no wrong.
Regards,
PH
P.S As to why the sandals on the head as you walk away. My thinking is walking barefooted balancing sandals on your head makes no noise and have a connotation of giving up prior claim which is pertinent to the idea of giving up ownership claim of the cat. The case is only valid if there are two people disputing it. Hence walk silently away and there will be no case.