Vajramusti
11-28-2004, 06:38 PM
Macadamian nuts all over the place?
Any one seen Oliver Stone's version of Alexander the Great? Comments? It has deservedly received lots of bad reviews but sometimes for the wrong reasons.
Despite the reviews- I thought that the actors on the whole did a fairly decent job. Poor history but decent enough acting.
Stone has his standard conspiracy theories- regarding the death of Alexander- he could have focused on the conspiracy theory that
Alexander may have had a hand in Phillips death. While there were some spectacular scenes in the two major battles- the strategy and tactics were not well explained- as they could have been. Didnt show several other battles- including the one in India where Alexander was badly injured. Instead the scene of Alexanders injury was Stone's creative fiction.
The battle where Alexander was injured was one of the main reasons for Alexander's retreat from India. And the well known author Green( a majoy Alexander bio) is unsure of the real cause of Alexander's death but among other possibilities mentions the lingering problems from the Indian arrow wound as a contribitory factor.
Soon after that Kautilya and Chandragupta defeated Seleucus and the Greek battalions left behind and formed the Maurya empire which covered most of India and included Afghanistan.
I thought Stone spent too much time on Alexander;s sexual preferences and also makes the great butcher sound like a fighter for "freedom".
My real question is--- does anyone know how metallurgically durable the "kopis" the curved shortsword od Alexander's time was?
The swords in Achilles's time were of brass and broke easily-
something that the movie Troy does not focus on. Movies often are poor history.
Any one seen Oliver Stone's version of Alexander the Great? Comments? It has deservedly received lots of bad reviews but sometimes for the wrong reasons.
Despite the reviews- I thought that the actors on the whole did a fairly decent job. Poor history but decent enough acting.
Stone has his standard conspiracy theories- regarding the death of Alexander- he could have focused on the conspiracy theory that
Alexander may have had a hand in Phillips death. While there were some spectacular scenes in the two major battles- the strategy and tactics were not well explained- as they could have been. Didnt show several other battles- including the one in India where Alexander was badly injured. Instead the scene of Alexanders injury was Stone's creative fiction.
The battle where Alexander was injured was one of the main reasons for Alexander's retreat from India. And the well known author Green( a majoy Alexander bio) is unsure of the real cause of Alexander's death but among other possibilities mentions the lingering problems from the Indian arrow wound as a contribitory factor.
Soon after that Kautilya and Chandragupta defeated Seleucus and the Greek battalions left behind and formed the Maurya empire which covered most of India and included Afghanistan.
I thought Stone spent too much time on Alexander;s sexual preferences and also makes the great butcher sound like a fighter for "freedom".
My real question is--- does anyone know how metallurgically durable the "kopis" the curved shortsword od Alexander's time was?
The swords in Achilles's time were of brass and broke easily-
something that the movie Troy does not focus on. Movies often are poor history.