PDA

View Full Version : Xin Yi / Xing Yi where forth art thou?



Sal Canzonieri
02-18-2005, 04:46 PM
here's a frustrating thread I have in the KF research, if anyone has any input, I'd love to discuss it:

1- What did Ji Long Feng (Ji Ji Ke) learn exactly?
2 - Who really were his students?
3- What are the roots of Xin yi ? Xing Yi?
4 - Where did the various forms from the various styles come from?


Question 2 is a bone of contention for a lot of people.
There seems to be no real evidence that he taught anyone of the 3 people that are attributed to be his direct students.

Cao Ji Wu there is no real link whatsoever, only in passing legend, erroneously passed from one Xing Yi teacher to another.
He might not even had been in the area to have had contact. He is not featured in the local historical gazettes.

Ma Xueli of Loyang, people from his city say he did not learn from Ji Long Feng, that a "wandering Taoist" visited him and passed on what became Xin Yi Liu Ho style of Henan Province (this Liu Ho is not the same as what is generally known as Six Harmony style, it is a Moslem style that is named after the six cornered hats they wear.).

And, there is the mystery of the Dai family style of Shanxi Province.
Dai Long Bang was said to have studied under Cao Ji Wu, which is untrue.
In fact, he learned the 10 Animals of Henan Xin Yi from Li Zheng, who was a student of Zhang Zhi Cheng, who was a student of Ma Xue Li.
Some martial arts historians claim that Cao Jiwu not only did not teach Xinyiquan to Dai Longbang, but was not related to Xinyiquan at all. The common believe that Cao was Dai Longbang’s teacher comes from another believe – that the "Introduction to Xinyiquan Boxing Manual" (Liu He Quan Xu) was written by Dai. However, there is no name below the text and there is no evidence Dai actually wrote it. While most Xingyiquan practitioners consider the "Introduction" to be a document of historical value, more and more researchers doubt its authenticity. Some even claim it is a forgery made out in Shanxi at the end of 19th century.

Dai Long Bang ladded the Five Elements and Three Fist forms to Henen 10 Animal Xin Yi to form: Dai Family Xin Yi Quan

Dai learned:

- Yi Quan of Shanxi Province, which is his family style, where the Five Elements and Three Fists forms come from originally.
These five elements are the same as in Shaolin Lohan 18 Hands forms (that's another thread!)

- Yue Fei style from Niu Xi Xian, who descends from Niu Gao, Yue Fei's Army Officer.

- Six Harmony Mantis from Jin Shi Kui, who was from Shandong Province. The Four Routines of Za Shi come from Jin Shi Kui.
I have looked him up on Mantis geneology charts and I have found him listed as a early found of Six Harmony Mantis, and that he traveled a lot and was missing from Shandong Province for many years, which of course is because he was in Shanxi teaching Dai Long Bang! That's a major piece of research that no one put two and two together about before!

- Henan Xin Yi Quan, 10 animal forms, which he learned from Li Zheng, who is of Ma Xue Li's lineage.

SO, that is how Xing Yi Quan got these forms into their system from Dai Long Bang's lineage?

Sal Canzonieri
02-18-2005, 04:46 PM
Question 4, where did forms come from?

Well, the above explains where forms that decend from Dai family come from that eventually became the main core (Five Elements) of Xing Yi Quan of Hebei Province.

Henan Xin Yi is a real mystery.
It is not like other Xing Yi ? Xin Yi styles.
For sure it is various Moslem martial arts mixed with something new.
Around Henan province, Yue Fei Jia Quan and style with various names but the same style like Wu Mu Quan are practiced since Song/Yuan Dynasty times.
These style practice forms or loose techniques that are very similar to Liu Ho (Six Harmony Quan) forms that are found in other provinces. I think for some reason people started calling Yue Fei family forms as Six Harmony Quan, but they are the same stuff in essence.
Liu Di Kan for one example practiced Yue Fei forms and called the style Six Harmony.

One interesting thing:
Ba Qua and Xin Yi share many of the same moves (just called different names but they are the same exact moves).
Well, it is well documented now that Dong Hai Chuan's family style was Ba Fan Quan, that he practiced with his uncle, etc., also called Ba Shan Fan, also now called Fan Tzi Quan. A side by side comparison of moves and their names was done by research scholars and they were found to be identical.

Well, Zhou Tong, who was Yue Fei's teacher, taught a style that is Fan Tzi and Chuo Jiao Quan combined, as all his students attested.

Hence, the similarities of sharing identical moves and sequences in forms between Ba Qua and Xing Yi / Xin Yi, they both have their roots in Fan Tzi/Chuo Jiao.

Fantzi/Chuo Jiao which was a root of Yue Fei Family styles (Fan tzi mixed with various styles that army officer practiced from all over the place, mostly loose techniques and smal forms, of cannon fist like movements),
which then splintered over the centuries into Six Harmony, Henan Xin Yi, and Eagle Claw (when Yue Fei mixed back with Fan Tzi).

So, that is somehow how Yue Fei is credited to being the founder of Six Harmony Quan, Xing Yi, and Eagle Claw.
It's not that he was the actual founder, it's that his feedback loop with what came before and after his connection to Fan Tzi / Chuo Jiao Quan.

(here's an aside to Zhou Tong's Fan Tzi, the style of Yan Qing (also called Mi-Tsong or Lost Track Shaolin Quan), is when the forms are analyzed pretty much only Fan Tzi / Chuo Jiao and old Shaolin mixed together. Some of Zhou Tong's students are part of Yan Qing's lineage).

For another thread:
Tai Tzu, Han Tong Tong Bei, and Northern Mantis and Fan Tzi (and Yan Qing Shaolin) share not only many moves in their forms, but also people in their ancestry, all students of Zhou Tong.

count
02-18-2005, 05:40 PM
More answers here. (http://emptyflower.com) ;)

Sal Canzonieri
02-18-2005, 07:58 PM
Originally posted by count
More answers here. (http://emptyflower.com) ;)

Well, nice site, but it says Dai Long Bang learned from
Cao Jiwu, which is documented to be untrue, he learned from Li Zheng, who was a student of Zhang Zhi Cheng, who was a student of Ma Xue Li.
Thus, Dai Xin Yi imported Ma's Henan Xin Yi BACK into Shanxi Province.

BAI HE
02-18-2005, 08:15 PM
Yes and it depends on which history and from whom
you deem as "the Truth".

Remember, it's only the truth if you wan't to believe in it.

As far as proving anything to be true in CMA history? Good luck. It's a fine recipe for grey hair.

count
02-18-2005, 08:35 PM
Bai He speaks the truth. Which truth I don't know? :confused: :D :D But I directed you there because there are way more Hsing-I guys and gals and you can discuss your research with others of like mind. Why don't you check out the forum?

BAI HE
02-18-2005, 09:35 PM
Beware those "WANDERING TAOIST" stories... red flag man, red flag. Any time someone want's to play around with the history and transmission of these arts it's always "THE WANDERING TAOIST". It lends instant credibility to any claim in regards to IMA.

Then think about what someone stands to gain from the WT story in the Chinese Martial Arts culture.
Bear in mind that the IMA's are a rather recent invention as far as verifiable sources indicate.

As far as XY history, did it ever occur to you that the Ji Ji Ke stories may be a stretch?
Concentrate on the last verifiable people who actually practiced
and disseminated XY and work your way back. You won't run into gaps in the front (18th century) , more likely in the back (past 18th century).

Joseph_alb
02-18-2005, 09:58 PM
Hey sal....where exactly did you get your "truth"? where did u read that Dai's xinyi comes from Ma Xue Li?

Sal Canzonieri
02-18-2005, 10:05 PM
Originally posted by BAI HE
Beware those "WANDERING TAOIST" stories... red flag man, red flag. Any time someone want's to play around with the history and transmission of these arts it's always "THE WANDERING TAOIST". It lends instant credibility to any claim in regards to IMA.

Then think about what someone stands to gain from the WT story in the Chinese Martial Arts culture.
Bear in mind that the IMA's are a rather recent invention as far as verifiable sources indicate.

As far as XY history, did it ever occur to you that the Ji Ji Ke stories may be a stretch?
Concentrate on the last verifiable people who actually practiced
and disseminated XY and work your way back. You won't run into gaps in the front (18th century) , more likely in the back (past 18th century).

I totally agree with you! Wandering Taoist have sure seminated a lot of CMA styles!!!

Yeah, the gaps occus before and after Ji Ji Ke, although he was very real person that is fully documented in the local gazettes. None of them mention his students as being the three legendary students: Cai Jiwu, Ma Xue Li, and the other guy.
There are no gaps from Ma Xue Li to today's Henan Xin Yi and no gaps from Dai Long Bang to Li and forward to today's Xing Yi quan.

The gaps all start as soon as you go looking earlier than Ma Xue Li for Xin Yi Liu Ho Quan and Dai Long Beng for Xin Yi (these two branches intersect at this point).

But earlier than Ma Xue Li? Who knows.

And Shanxi Xin Yi Quan? Who taught who?
The key to the past is the Shanxi lineages.

Joseph_alb
02-18-2005, 10:18 PM
uh..Sal?

Sal Canzonieri
02-18-2005, 10:33 PM
Originally posted by Joseph_alb
uh..Sal?

From here:

"The written material (mainly copies of old boxing manuscripts) and oral transmission (also in Taigu, center for Shanxi Xingyiquan) mention the name of a Li Zheng as the one Dai learnt the boxing from. Li Zheng was a famous Henan Xinyi Liuhe Quan exponent, native of Lushan in Henan Province, student of Zhang Zhicheng and grand-student of Ma Xueli. The comparison between Dai Family Xinyiquan and Henan Xinyi Liuhe Quan shows enough similarities to prove that they either come from the same root or/and there has been extensive exchange between the masters of both styles."

http://www.chinafrominside.com/ma/xyxy/daihistory.html

Joseph_alb
02-18-2005, 10:49 PM
They may come from the same source or they may have exchanged knowledge. Read it again, it incourages flexibility of mind. =)

scholar
02-19-2005, 01:02 AM
Originally posted by BAI HE
Beware those "WANDERING TAOIST" stories... red flag man, red flag. Any time someone want's to play around with the history and transmission of these arts it's always "THE WANDERING TAOIST". It lends instant credibility to any claim in regards to IMA.
....


They are mildly entertaining, but they have all the credibility of a Spiderman comic book. Unfortunately, before about 1800 or so, there just isn't any reliable information on the internal arts, so of course people want to "fill in the gaps" so to speak. There are many motives for this. A big part of the phenomenon was the very popular Chinese martial "pulp fiction" so prevalent in the early 20th century. That started the ball rolling. Also, many MA schools want to "pad their resumes" with spectacular stories of their mythic past.

Chinese martial arts do have a long history of evolution associated with monastic Taoists and Buddhists, but that history was necessarily secretive, so all we are left with is speculation about that evolution. Broader themes may be discerned by educated guesses in the last thousand years or so, Neo-Confucianism and foreign domination for two, but specific lineages can only be traced back a few centuries at most.