PDA

View Full Version : Hsk Considerations In Research



Kennyfist
09-26-2005, 03:47 AM
Hsk,
How do we know futsan didn't change dates and make things up?

What about possible agenda of income from tourist attraction?

Have you answered about "is that the whole and full extent of your "research" for your long ji choy = jeong yim claim" ?

What about how you take some info from "chan sources" and reject others....then use this info in your "argument" on your website? (Remember YOU told us where you got the info about Choy fook's scarred head?)

Do you take bits and pieces from other people's sources at your own liberty and mould them into your own little model? What is your criteria for using and rejecting things from other sources?

Oh, you can easily "fix" the thing about 12 and 1836? WHO IS CHANGING STORY? DOES THAT SOUND CONVENIENT TO THOSE WHO DON'T BUY YOUR STORY?

WHAT KIND OF REASONING OR EVIDENCE IS THIS : "OH IT IS POSSIBLE CHAN BIASED.....OH RUMOUR THAT CHAN DID THIS......." WHAT ABOUT POSSIBILITY OF FUTSAN BIAS? HOW DO WE KNOW THEY DIDN'T MAKE THINGS UP?
YOU ATTACK CHAN YIU CHI SOURCE? WHY SHOULD ANYNONE NOT LISTEN TO THE GRANDSON ABOUT HIS GRANDFATHER....YET LISTEN TO ANOTHER GROUP....YOUR FUTSAN GROUP.....?

NOW WHEN WAS CHAN YIU CHI MANUSCRIPT WRITTEN? WHEN WAS FUTSAN "RECORDS" WRITTEN? WHEN WAS GGM CONTROVERSEY STARTED?

IF FUTSAN WRITES "RECORDS" NOW THAT GGM WAS WONG FEI HUNG.....ARE YOU GOING TO US IT?