PDA

View Full Version : ot Mothers see pregnancy as a "career move"



Hieronim
07-16-2006, 02:10 PM
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/this_britain/article1180248.ece

Teenage mothers see pregnancy as a 'career move'
Girls as young as 13 decide that parenting offers a better life than dead-end jobs, says new report
By Sophie Goodchild and Jonathan Owen
Published: 16 July 2006

Teenage girls who get pregnant are deliberately "planning" to become mothers in the belief that a baby will improve the quality of their lives.

An extensive study published today reveals that girls as young as 13 are making a "career choice" by deciding to have children, since they see parenting as preferable to working in a dead-end job.

The findings from the Trust for the Study of Adolescence challenges the assumption that schoolgirl mothers are all irresponsible adolescents who are ignorant about using contraception. The revelation that teenage girls are actively choosing motherhood is backed up by official figures obtained by this paper which show that nearly a quarter of pregnancies to under 18s are second children.

The research will have huge implications for government policy, which gives little acknowledgement to the fact that some girls see motherhood as the right decision for them. Britain has highest teenage pregnancy rate in Europe, with an estimated cost to the Government of at least Ł63m a year. The parts of the country that have most teenage births are areas of poverty and high unemployment; girls from low-income families are 10 times more likely to become teenage mothers than those from affluent backgrounds.

The research, funded by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, was based on interviews with 13- to 22-year-old mothers living in six deprived parts of Britain who had either taken a fatalistic attitude to getting pregnant by stopping taking contraception or who had actively planned to have a child with the support of their partners.

All the interviewees were well aware how to protect against pregnancy and were strongly anti-abortion. Nearly three-quarters were in steady relationships with the father of their child. Only a handful of girls said they regretted getting pregnant. The vast majority said their lives had improved after having children, that having a baby had "corrected" their deprived childhoods and turned them away from destructive behaviour such as drink and drug abuse.

Experts say that the truth about planned teenage pregnancies has been masked until now because health workers often assume they happen accidentally and because young girls tend to keep their true motives secret.

The study's authors are calling on ministers to use sex education classes to highlight the fact that fertility is at its highest in adolescence. They hope to target girls who leave pregnancy to chance by offering them alternatives and to use those who have had negative experiences to educate others about the downsides. But they also pose the question whether teenage pregnancy should always be avoided, given the positive experiences of the girls surveyed.

Aimee Marsh did not intend to get pregnant at the age of 15 but had discussed the possibility with her 18-year-old boyfriend, Lee. Their baby daughter, Demi-Leigh, was born 13 days ago and Ms Marsh, now 16, is planning to have three children in total, though she intends to wait until she is 25. "It is not as hard as I thought it would be," says Ms Marsh, from Plymouth, who hopes to go to college to do a hair and beauty course. "There is still some prejudice around young mums, but you can have kids at any age as long as you enjoy life and it brings you happiness."

However, ministers have rejected the report's suggestion that teenage pregnancy can be a positive option, saying it invariably leads to "negative consequences for all concerned".

Teenage girls who get pregnant are deliberately "planning" to become mothers in the belief that a baby will improve the quality of their lives.

An extensive study published today reveals that girls as young as 13 are making a "career choice" by deciding to have children, since they see parenting as preferable to working in a dead-end job.

The findings from the Trust for the Study of Adolescence challenges the assumption that schoolgirl mothers are all irresponsible adolescents who are ignorant about using contraception. The revelation that teenage girls are actively choosing motherhood is backed up by official figures obtained by this paper which show that nearly a quarter of pregnancies to under 18s are second children.

The research will have huge implications for government policy, which gives little acknowledgement to the fact that some girls see motherhood as the right decision for them. Britain has highest teenage pregnancy rate in Europe, with an estimated cost to the Government of at least Ł63m a year. The parts of the country that have most teenage births are areas of poverty and high unemployment; girls from low-income families are 10 times more likely to become teenage mothers than those from affluent backgrounds.

The research, funded by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, was based on interviews with 13- to 22-year-old mothers living in six deprived parts of Britain who had either taken a fatalistic attitude to getting pregnant by stopping taking contraception or who had actively planned to have a child with the support of their partners.

All the interviewees were well aware how to protect against pregnancy and were strongly anti-abortion. Nearly three-quarters were in steady relationships with the father of their child. Only a handful of girls said they regretted getting pregnant. The vast majority said their lives had improved after having children, that having a baby had "corrected" their deprived childhoods and turned them away from destructive behaviour such as drink and drug abuse.
Experts say that the truth about planned teenage pregnancies has been masked until now because health workers often assume they happen accidentally and because young girls tend to keep their true motives secret.

The study's authors are calling on ministers to use sex education classes to highlight the fact that fertility is at its highest in adolescence. They hope to target girls who leave pregnancy to chance by offering them alternatives and to use those who have had negative experiences to educate others about the downsides. But they also pose the question whether teenage pregnancy should always be avoided, given the positive experiences of the girls surveyed.

Aimee Marsh did not intend to get pregnant at the age of 15 but had discussed the possibility with her 18-year-old boyfriend, Lee. Their baby daughter, Demi-Leigh, was born 13 days ago and Ms Marsh, now 16, is planning to have three children in total, though she intends to wait until she is 25. "It is not as hard as I thought it would be," says Ms Marsh, from Plymouth, who hopes to go to college to do a hair and beauty course. "There is still some prejudice around young mums, but you can have kids at any age as long as you enjoy life and it brings you happiness."

However, ministers have rejected the report's suggestion that teenage pregnancy can be a positive option, saying it invariably leads to "negative consequences for all concerned".

Royal Dragon
07-16-2006, 02:22 PM
And this is new ....How?

Providing a man with a child has been a hook for financial security since the caveman times. Nothing new here.

GeneChing
08-27-2009, 12:14 PM
Here's a hot button topic. Click for pic of the ad. That's what sinks this, IMO.

Chinese abortion ad: Is it crossing the line? (http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfmoms/detail?entry_id=46341&tsp=1)

A hospital in Chongqing, China, recently released an advertisement offering half-price abortions for women who show a student ID. The ad is making the rounds on the Internet.

According to the Web site Shanghailist, the advertisement (above) reads:

Students are our future, but when something happens to them, who will help and protect them? Chongqing Huaxi Women's Hospital has started Students Care Month, where those students who come to get an abortion can get 50% off if they show their student ids. Abortion surgeries are the most advanced in the world, won't stretch (your womb), won't hurt, it's quick, and you can do what you want afterward, it won't affect your studies or your work.

The advertisement has created quite a stir. When Babble's Strollerderby blogger Brett Singer wrote in a post, "Pro-life, pro-choice, wherever you stand in the abortion debate, I think we can perhaps all agree that a hospital advertising 'half price abortions if you show your student ID' crosses a line, the majority of his readers disagreed.

One reader commented:

I'm not offended at all. This sounds like a good policy to me, I wish abortions were more affordable here in the US. No one should ever decide to have a baby just because they can't afford an abortion. In my state, the state children's health insurance program will pay for abortions for women who meet income requirements, but you have to wait 2-4 weeks to be approved. The limit for abortion here is 12 weeks, so depending on when the woman finds out she is pregnant, many would be past the first trimester if they waited for the coverage. Kind of sounds like you are just trying to fan the flames of the abortion debate.

Another reader wrote in:

China is not the West, get used to it. Students "study" (read: work) up to 10 hours a day, at minimum 6 days a week. Many have tutors to fill in their spare time. If a student doesn’t get into University (the point of all this study), then they often feel inadequate and are prone to suicide. It is THAT much of a big deal. In China you get ONE chance at university: the high school leaver exam. There are night classes for adults, sure, but they can’t just wander into a university, flash some ID and get accepted like they can here (New Zealand). You simply don't become a single mother in China. They worry much more about shaming their families than us--having a child out of wedlock would bring shame. In the context of China, this ad is not worth mentioning. Maybe it'd cause a stir in the US...Maybe if there were cut-price abortions with student ID here I wouldn’t see so many single mothers struggling along.

And another reader commented:

I think the problem is that, here in the United States, people have allowed anti-abortion activists to frame the debate so much, that even people who are pro-choice are expected to treat abortions as necessary tragedies. Women are expected to experience some kind of negative psychological effects after having an abortion, she is supposed to speak about it softly and with regret, or preferably, not at all. However, the reality is that an early abortion is a relatively minor outpatient surgery with a low risk for complications. I have personally taken my sister and two friends to have an abortion, and the only thing that they felt afterward was immense relief. And even though I agree that abortions should be affordable for all woman who need one, it makes sense to me to offer students a special discount, as students often do not work or only work part-time.

Whether you think the advertisement crosses the line or not, it definitely shows the difference in attitudes about abortion in the United States and China. Or at least the ad signifies the prevalence of abortion in modern-day Chinese culture.

The number of abortions performed in China each year tops 13 million according to CNN. And this number is expected to be much higher because it's based on figures collected only from registered medical institutions. It's assumed that many abortions are performed at unregistered clinics.

Inadequate knowledge of contraception plays a major role in China's annual abortion tally, according to CNN. China has a strict one-child policy, which the government has used to control its population growth. Abortion is legal in China and is widely used as a birth-control method. Abortions in China cost about 600 yuan, or $88, China Daily reported in July.

Meanwhile the United States with a population roughly a quarter that of China reported less than a 10th of the number of abortions--820,151--in 2005, the most recent figures available from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In 2005 in the United States, the cost of a nonhospital abortion with local anesthesia at 10 weeks' gestation ranged from $90 to $1,800; the average amount paid was $413, according to the Guttmacher Institute.

In the United States where abortions are less common and our culture is clearly divided on the ethics of abortion, how do you think people would react if a hospital released an ad similar to the Chinese one?

sanjuro_ronin
08-27-2009, 12:19 PM
Oivey !!
On ALL accounts !!