Co-Inhabitation-Cool Pic

[Black Jack II]

I thought some may find this cool.

Is this evidence of of dinosaurs and co-inhabitation with man in the far off past...maybe a few that somehow survived the ice age and fell off at a later date....or maybe the collective ancestor memory of these creatures put into stone...or maybe just a really good artist.

http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/print/3626

[David Jamieson]

Could very likely be that there are or were smallish remnant of saurians around right up to and following the ice age end...which we are still in the middle of apparently.

anyway, I am surprised that article didn't mention anything about Ica or the Ica stones. I mean, there are a lot of representations of saurians in ancient art. A surprising amount.

[fopah]

there is actually a second page that goes into detail about the ica stones. at the end of the article it says "to be continued". click... and magically a new page emerges.

[RD'S Alias - 1A]

This means man is alot older than we thought, OR dinos didn't all die suddenly 65 million years ago.

[MasterKiller]

This means man is alot older than we thought, OR dinos didn't all die suddenly 65 million years ago.

Of course they didn't all die. Their decedents still exist, even as tasty nuggets in Happy Meals.

I'm sure the Jesus nuts will try to use these as proof the world is only 6,000 years old, though.

[diego]

I thought some may find this cool.

Is this evidence of of dinosaurs and co-inhabitation with man in the far off past...maybe a few that somehow survived the ice age and fell off at a later date....or maybe the collective ancestor memory of these creatures put into stone...or maybe just a really good artist.

http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/print/3626

pretty cool

[MasterKiller]

Look at the source. :rolleyes:

http://www.apologeticspress.org/

A nutty X-tian web magazine aimed at nutty x-tian fundamentalists.

[David Jamieson]

yes, well I'm pretty sure they didn't manufacture the artifacts and Im sure they will find some sort of agenda in them, but nevertheless, there they are. Pretty neat.

[MasterKiller]

yes, well I'm pretty sure they didn't manufacture the artifacts and Im sure they will find some sort of agenda in them, but nevertheless, there they are. Pretty neat.

http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/3656

[Lucas]

the science of "dating" is not that old. apparently, as it is constantly being changed and disputed, its not that accurate either.

that old term from grade school comes reeling back to the forefront of my mind on this one:

"estimated and or educated guesses."

[Lucas]

although those Cambodian ruinous carvings are **** awesome.

[David Jamieson]

The temple carving could also be a prank from restoration people like the spaceman on the medieval church that was put here by a restoration crew. It is possible.

see:
medeival spaceman! lol (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v202/kunglek/DSCN0540.jpg)

[Yao Sing]

the science of "dating" is not that old. apparently

Check with RD on that, he's the resident "dating" expert. :D

[Oso]

http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/3656

those ****ers are scary.


.308

[golden arhat]

isnt it possible that dinosaur remains werent as heavily buried during the ice age as they are today ?

surely a couple of thousand years backward and there would be a whole lot of fossils would be much more apparent just because nature hasnt covered them up to the extent they are today

i'm sure cavemen may have come to the same conclusions regarding dinosaurs as we have


or thought they were magical creatures from long past and worshipped them as such

[David Jamieson]

magical creatures that were worshiped.

sounds like dragons! lol

[Black Jack II]

Know one was saying this has anything to do with anyone's dogma. It just is an interesting crypto find.

But since you brought it up, this site, which is religious based, has a collection of some of the artifacts and tribal paintings seen over the world that show the same thing.

http://www.genesispark.org/genpark/ancient/ancient.htm

If you look at the page more as a collection of photo's which are in the same vein as the starting topic, then it is pretty cool to see what is out their.

[monji112000]

I'm sure the Jesus nuts will try to use these as proof the world is only 6,000 years old, though.

hey its 5,700 and something not 6,000. The "bible" says nothing about these so called dinosaurs.. so they could not exist. The bones must have been magically placed there to F--- with our heads. The bible mentions nothing about people going to the bathroom so... this practice as well must be a new practice. I'm assuming the food just magically disappeared in their bodies.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oqbeo5A6ujE

[golden arhat]

hey its 5,700 and something not 6,000. The "bible" says nothing about these so called dinosaurs.. so they could not exist. The bones must have been magically placed there to F--- with our heads. The bible mentions nothing about people going to the bathroom so... this practice as well must be a new practice. I'm assuming the food just magically disappeared in their bodies.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oqbeo5A6ujE

oh no it appears we have a prankster goddd .....ahhhhh and it all seemed so plausible



lol i love bill hicks

[golden arhat]

i made my choice..................(any slayer fans out there wanna finish that off for me)

[MasterKiller]

Definitive Proof! (http://lee.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/raptor-jesus.thumbnail.jpg)

[SanHeChuan]

I hate to disappoint but these works of art where obviously made from past life memories.

The boy who lived before part 1 of 5. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RRs7fXjs_w)













I didn't believe in any kind of afterlife but now, I'm almost a believer. :eek:

[Lucas]

i made my choice..................(any slayer fans out there wanna finish that off for me)

six six six

[David Jamieson]

...and the dead shall walk the earth.

ok? get it now?
revelations people! It's in the BIBle!


seriously though, science seems to work quite often on a sliding scale in regards to the age of earth the universe and everything. It's a guessing game at this point and while there is some certainty, there was equal certainty in science 100 years ago that was absolutely contrary to what is now and 100 years from now, it is VERY possible that everything we "know" will be invalid.

heck, my own schooling in history and geography in middle and high school contains so much falseness it almost invalidates the better half of it.

I don't have a problem with the idea or the concept of a supreme being who absolutely controls our destiny and existence.

[golden arhat]

six six six



nice one



haha high five

[diego]

Check with RD on that, he's the resident "dating" expert. :D

http://youtube.com/watch?v=9wy4wq_lTbc

[Shaolin Wookie]

hey its 5,700 and something not 6,000. The "bible" says nothing about these so called dinosaurs.. so they could not exist. The bones must have been magically placed there to F--- with our heads. The bible mentions nothing about people going to the bathroom so... this practice as well must be a new practice. I'm assuming the food just magically disappeared in their bodies.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oqbeo5A6ujE

Actually, the Bible does mention things about people going to the bathroom, where they were supposed to go to the bathroom with regard to the holy temples, and even at one point tells them all to cook their food by burning ****.

As for Co-inhabitation, mankind went through a 7 million year evolution process, with "modern man" really coming into play in the last 30K years, after some kind of neural mutation equipped him with abstract thought, which still puts him woefully short of any dino-horsies.

Besides, if their only support are cave drawings with little inscriptions saying: "Here there be dinos", then I think we know what's up.

As an example of bad logic and even worse editorial writing--why are the two conclusions: "It supports young earth creationism, and means that people co-existed with dinos in the past 6 thousand years..." (which is just laugable, and immediately discredits the journalist), or "It's a boar with bushes behind it".........because nobody's interested in the actual phenomenon, only what spin they can put on it to further their secular and religious-nutso ideals.

Couldn't it be imagination? Every culture has a dragon in it, yet it varies from continent to continent; and every culture has dino-like creatures, either responding to whimsy or perhaps to discoveries of dinosaur bones they pieced together out of fascination. Just because someone drew a unicorn doesn't mean it existed. But there were horses, and there were horned creatures. So, some Cambodian in the jungle draws a hippo with plates on its back--couldn't he be drawing on a cultural phenomenon we know nothing about? Or, maybe piecing together a stegosaur out of some bones recovered after an earthquake, tsunami, or something wicked that that way came?

But no, they saw the carving and immediately thought: "Hey man....it's like Jurassic Park meets Left Behind!"

[Shaolin Wookie]

Besides, I don't know a scientist in the world who would dismiss that carving as trivial and unimportant, which makes me think the artifact is either manufactured or the "journalistians" pulled the article out of their ass.

[David Jamieson]

If we were evolved why do our teeth rot so easily? why do some of us still have an appendix while others are now born without it and those that do have one can find themselves in trouble for having one! Why are so many of us failing in eye site, why is youth and old age two periods where you are generally physically compromised or useless that comprise a good chunk of your life. NOt too mention the scads of birth defects and genetic defects that we are plagued with.
If we are in th image of god, then god is mighty in the messed up department.

our bodies are filled with redundant systems that are indicative of an unfinished system. we have a lot of faults, hundreds of defects and many inabilities to deal with viruses and so on.

Highly evolved is something we are sadly not. In fact, we are only marginally better than the other species that share our dna. IE: primates