NJM
05-06-2008, 03:58 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_martial_arts - way too biased towards certain styles.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_style_tai_chi_chuan - stub article.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zui_Quan - vague, media-biased garbage.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_lei_tai_fighters - needs more detail.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wong_Fei_Hung - expand beyond media.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Yu_Cheung - needs more bio information.
Not to mention all the stuff here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Chinese_martial_arts
and the other pages.
If you want to take the CMA wikipedia articles out of the hands of keyboard warriors and misinformed sinophiles, I think you should give it a go, fellas.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_style_tai_chi_chuan - stub article.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zui_Quan - vague, media-biased garbage.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_lei_tai_fighters - needs more detail.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wong_Fei_Hung - expand beyond media.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Yu_Cheung - needs more bio information.
Not to mention all the stuff here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Chinese_martial_arts
and the other pages.
If you want to take the CMA wikipedia articles out of the hands of keyboard warriors and misinformed sinophiles, I think you should give it a go, fellas.