PDA

View Full Version : Stephan Bonnar is immune to Dim Mak-so good



Black Jack II
06-25-2008, 10:17 AM
This is so funny.

A local Palos Hills instructor here in Chicago, nicknamed the "Human Stun Gun", who is a 7th degree black belt under uber con man George Dillman, tries his Dim Mak jerkofism on the local Gracie BJJ/MMA team under controlled conditions and fails.

Notice that Stephan Bonnar is one of the students who he is trying this out on.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qa1nzD-n25Q

MasterKiller
06-25-2008, 10:34 AM
old .

1bad65
06-25-2008, 10:34 AM
LMAO at that one guy, "I got hit in the head alot".

tattooedmonk
06-25-2008, 11:10 AM
Pathetic........

sanjuro_ronin
06-25-2008, 11:14 AM
Maybe he sould have gotten one of these first:

http://www.themartialist.com/pecom/dimmaktester.htm

sanjuro_ronin
06-25-2008, 11:23 AM
Dim Mak works for me, but I deliver it a little different:

Ray Pina
06-25-2008, 12:03 PM
Very funny.

He says it's particularly hard on athletes... what does that say about his students that fall over like a stack of pennies.:)

It's getting harder and harder to be full of ****. For this we should all be thankful. And personally I think MMA has a great deal to do with it.

bodhitree
06-25-2008, 12:08 PM
Maybe he sould have gotten one of these first:

http://www.themartialist.com/pecom/dimmaktester.htm


Whatever he's selling it for I'll go lower. They stole the idea from me:mad:

Mulong
06-26-2008, 05:26 AM
This was total B.S.!

40% meanings gullible students! :D

Ray Pina
06-26-2008, 08:29 AM
A technique that works less than half of the time... that's worth mastering.

1bad65
06-26-2008, 08:48 AM
A technique that works less than half of the time... that's worth mastering.

Exactly.

And it fails against more athletic people. Isn't that who you would need to use it against the most? :rolleyes:

sanjuro_ronin
06-26-2008, 08:50 AM
Exactly.

And it fails against more athletic people. Isn't that who you would need to use it against the most? :rolleyes:

That's crazy talk.
Statistically speaking, you are more likely to be anally probed by aliens than to run into a trained fighter on the "REAL STREETS".
Better to work on something that probably won't work on anyone than to sweat hard and have to fight for real, who needs that kind of stress?

MasterKiller
06-26-2008, 08:55 AM
That's crazy talk.
Statistically speaking, you are more likely to be anally probed by aliens than to run into a trained fighter on the "REAL STREETS".
Not in Oklahoma, Texas, Iowa, or Ohio...lots of wrestlers walking the streets.

sanjuro_ronin
06-26-2008, 08:57 AM
Not in Oklahoma, Texas, Iowa, or Ohio...lots of wrestlers walking the streets.

There are street walkers that are wrestlers in those areas?
Wow.

doug maverick
06-26-2008, 10:03 AM
this has been something thats been talked about over and over again. the no hands **** is a sham that only works on ones students blah...blah....blah...lets move on please.

MasterKiller
06-26-2008, 10:10 AM
There are street walkers that are wrestlers in those areas?
Wow.

Of course! Sometimes, you can't even see the Adam's apple.

cjurakpt
06-26-2008, 11:12 AM
Of course! Sometimes, you can't even see the Adam's apple.

that's because they've had it surgically relocated...:eek:

golden arhat
06-26-2008, 12:20 PM
60% of the time it works........all the time:cool:

1bad65
06-26-2008, 12:30 PM
60% of the time it works........all the time:cool:

You have heard Dillman's excuse for failures right?

sanjuro_ronin
06-26-2008, 12:43 PM
Actually, in regards to the points that are base don "pain compliance" there are many people that are "non-responsive", one of the many reason I don't hold to much stock on pain compliance moves.
As for neural override points, you really can't be "non-responsive" to those, though some can be overly sensitive to them.

cjurakpt
06-26-2008, 12:45 PM
You have heard Dillman's excuse for failures right?

yeah - tongue and toes not in the right place :rolleyes:

people should read up a bit more on things like entrainment and NLP / anchoring before they get all excited about this silliness

David Jamieson
06-26-2008, 06:03 PM
Stop the breath or stop the blood flow. Or, engage an effective lock.

These and the methods that support them are superior to any sort of 'theoretical' pain compliance.

They are fail safe.

Pain compliance is faulted from the get go because there are thresholds and they differ from person to person.

On a bizzarely lighter note... as an alternative, you can repeatedly smash someone about the body, head and neck as fast and as furiously as possible. This can also be effective. :p

golden arhat
06-26-2008, 08:09 PM
You have heard Dillman's excuse for failures right?

youve blatantly never watched anchorman have you ? hahaha you should.

still, nice to see you in some real discussion as opposed to..... well we wont go into that


its a nice change

Scott R. Brown
06-27-2008, 03:19 AM
I am a firm believer in Dim Muck!:confused:

I know for a fact it works nearly 100% of the time, on nearly everyone and on any target on the body. :confused:

It is true that some areas of the body are more vulnerable than others and.....

......you must hit the target at a velocity of approximately 1235 fps with an impact force of about 535 ft-lbs!:eek:

I can teach just about anyone this mysterious art for about a $500-$700 initial investment and as little as one to two hours of training per week!;)

sanjuro_ronin
06-27-2008, 04:29 AM
I am a firm believer in Dim Muck!:confused:

I know for a fact it works nearly 100% of the time, on nearly everyone and on any target on the body. :confused:

It is true that some areas of the body are more vulnerable than others and.....

......you must hit the target at a velocity of approximately 1235 fps with an impact force of about 535 ft-lbs!:eek:

I can teach just about anyone this mysterious art for about a $500-$700 initial investment and as little as one to two hours of training per week!;)

Do you throw in a free rubber ducky?