PDA

View Full Version : Missouri GOP Wants to Repeal Child Labor Laws



Syn7
02-17-2011, 04:48 PM
http://voices.kansascity.com/entries/missouri-senator-wants-repeal-child-labor-laws/





Ah, to be a kid in Missouri.

If state Sen. Jane Cunningham has her way, the under-14 crowd will no longer have to worry about those stuffy labor laws saying they can’t hold a job. Teenagers of all ages will be freed from restrictions limiting how many hours they can flip burgers. And if they want to staff the drive-through window all night long, Cunningham is for that too. To heck with those early morning classes.

To see Cunningham’s motives, check out the latest information.

The Missouri legislature can always be counted on to come up with bizarre legislation, but Senate Bill 222 is the strangest we’ve see in awhile.

Cunningham, a Republican from St. Louis County, would also repeal the requirement that 14- and-15-year-olds apply for a special permit in order to work. And the state Division of Labor Standards would no longer inspect workplaces tht employ children or require them to keep special records for their youthful employees.

Cunningham is totally pro-business, but this is over the top. Under her proposed legislation, a 12- or-13-year-old could be sent to work full time in Missouri, perhaps under the guise of receiving a home-school education, of which Cunningham is a big supporter.

This bill sounds too D1ckensian to go anywhere, but you never know. One ominous sign: Cunningham’s bill is assigned to the Senate’s general laws committee, which is chaired by…Senator Jane Cunningham.



Read more: http://voices.kansascity.com/entries/missouri-senator-wants-repeal-child-labor-laws/#ixzz1EGMXzIzs



http://littlegreenfootballs.com/page/238107_Missouri_lawmaker_wants_to_rep




http://www.alternet.org/newsandviews/article/475205/missouri_gop_wants_to_repeal_child_labor_laws/





Missouri State Child Labor Laws

http://www.ehow.com/list_6369788_missouri-state-child-labor-laws.html


Modified child labor laws

http://www.senate.mo.gov/11info/bts_web/Bill.aspx?SessionType=R&BillID=4124271


SB 222 – This act modifies the child labor laws. It eliminates the prohibition on employment of children under age fourteen. Restrictions on the number of hours and restrictions on when a child may work during the day are also removed. It also repeals the requirement that a child ages fourteen or fifteen obtain a work certificate or work permit in order to be employed. Children under sixteen will also be allowed to work in any capacity in a motel, resort or hotel where sleeping accommodations are furnished. It also removes the authority of the director of the Division of Labor Standards to inspect employers who employ children and to require them to keep certain records for children they employ. It also repeals the presumption that the presence of a child in a workplace is evidence of employment.

Syn7
02-18-2011, 02:42 PM
and nobody cares.............



this is brutal... i cant believe some of the sh1t that gets you guys riled up... and this one slips under the radar???

maybe it was too much, all those links... one might have to actually read a few facts... instead of throwing down a few opinion stories i put the actual laws now and the amendments down there... and nothing... come on now...

KC Elbows
02-18-2011, 04:11 PM
When the major companies use child labor overseas without stopping even after they're caught, they idea they'll make distinctions for the children of Americans is foolish.

But no, companies are moving overseas because of the taxes. Mind you, not to Britain or any other first world nation. But to India and China, where you can make people sew a shirt in six minutes for a dime in pay, and fire anyone who can't, and move as soon as those workers want a fair wage.

But no, it's the taxes. It's not that the developing world needs the work so bad that they'll accept kids not being schooled and damage to the country that these companies won't have to pay for like they would if they did the same things in the first world. No, it's the taxes.

**** taxes made Walmart employ kids, get caught, and continue doing so to this day. **** taxes.

Syn7
02-18-2011, 04:35 PM
When the major companies use child labor overseas without stopping even after they're caught, they idea they'll make distinctions for the children of Americans is foolish.

But no, companies are moving overseas because of the taxes. Mind you, not to Britain or any other first world nation. But to India and China, where you can make people sew a shirt in six minutes for a dime in pay, and fire anyone who can't, and move as soon as those workers want a fair wage.

But no, it's the taxes. It's not that the developing world needs the work so bad that they'll accept kids not being schooled and damage to the country that these companies won't have to pay for like they would if they did the same things in the first world. No, it's the taxes.

**** taxes made Walmart employ kids, get caught, and continue doing so to this day. **** taxes.



yeah.... walmart... true patriots... rather than make less and support their nation and the people of america, they do anything and everything to maximize profits for their shareholders(as they are legally bound to do) regardless of the consequences... its a problem... its sad that it would evolve into this... where profits take precedent over people... thats what america was supposed to be free of... true patriotism made the economy strong... taxes were like 85%... it was the golden age of america... it payed for your aging infastructure... i dont know the answer... i dont like the idea of having to force people to do the right thing... its unfortunate that they dont... the sad part is that the majority do do the right things, or would given the opportunity... its a small percentage whos greed has brought everything caving in on the US... its sad... its spreading and its nowhere near unique... america was unique but they have been inflicted with a very old and common type of ailement... but whats even more sad is that the people dont seem to be enraged over this? wheres the american spirit??? wheres the opposition to wall street??? guys who are in charge of oversight comitees for wall street leave office and go work for...... wall street... nice big payday... thanx for not charging us with our crimes, heres a kush gig and a fat cheque... love ya! wtf is that all about??? why arent the streets full of seriously ****ed off people???

KC Elbows
02-18-2011, 04:47 PM
yeah.... walmart... true patriots... rather than make less and support their nation and the people of america, they do anything and everything to maximize profits for their shareholders(as they are legally bound to do) regardless of the consequences... its a problem... its sad that it would evolve into this... where profits take precedent over people... thats what america was supposed to be free of... true patriotism made the economy strong... taxes were like 85%... it was the golden age of america... it payed for your aging infastructure... i dont know the answer... i dont like the idea of having to force people to do the right thing... its unfortunate that they dont... the sad part is that the majority do do the right things, or would given the opportunity... its a small percentage whos greed has brought everything caving in on the US... its sad... its spreading and its nowhere near unique... america was unique but they have been inflicted with a very old and common type of ailement... but whats even more sad is that the people dont seem to be enraged over this? wheres the american spirit??? wheres the opposition to wall street??? guys who are in charge of oversight comitees for wall street leave office and go work for...... wall street... nice big payday... thanx for not charging us with our crimes, heres a kush gig and a fat cheque... love ya! wtf is that all about??? why arent the streets full of seriously ****ed off people???

You are aware that the period of time in which we haven't had an underclass or slave class kept in that position by legal trickery and force is less than one lifetime, right?