To the moderator, enough is enough.

[Hendrik]

http://www.kungfumagazine.com/forum/showthread.php?67727-Hendrik-is-on-to&p=1270612#post1270612

[Minghequan]

Hendrik, I have made no threats just simple and totally factual statements of which I am perfectly willing to go that extra mile and attest to by signing and posting a legally recognised document .... something you fail to be able or willing to do which would reasonable indicate that you don't have faith within or even believe the very statements you have made on this forum.

And yes your 100% right, this is no place for politics and negative contributions such as using a well recognised Master's name and reputation as is the case with Sifu Lee Kong and Sifu Yung and so called quotes (Which have been factually proven did not exist) to bolster your own agenda as you have plainly done so here!

Sorry Hendrik, but your just being plain silly and well rather childish now, Crying foul after the milk has been spilled is not a defence for your actions and statements here. So whinging and whining and trying to involve the moderators and evoking the rules of this forum will not save you.

Nothing I have posted here is defamatory nor incorrect. As stated I am willing and readily able to put my name to same via a legally recognised document.

You started this thread yes, but you don't "own" the rights for others to discuss here so telling me to "get out of your 'threat'(sic)" isn't going to cut it with me. You are not a moderator, simply a member like everyone else is. I'm not slagging you off nor am I putting you down using overly emotive language. I am however simply stating the facts and I have as much right as anyone else here to take part in this discussion and this forum.

I'm not going to simply "go away" cause you don't like the truths and the facts of the very matters you have raised here.

So once again Hendrik,

I have full permission to post Sifu Lee Kong's comments on this issue! He has stated in full that he is ok with me stating this and in getting his message out. I am more than willing to sign the required Legal Documentation to this effect and then publish same here!

Hendrik I ask you now, where is your proof, where is your signed Legal Testament to what you write here?

Where is your 100% solid written and fully signed, documented proof that I have breached Sifu Lee Kong's privacy on this matter?

Once again I call upon you to:

Call upon you to issue a proper and full public apology to both Sifu Lee Kong (Whose name you used without his verification and who you attributed false statements to) and Sifu Yung (who you attributed false statements to, s attempted to sully his reputation via your own actions and used his material without his expressed permission)

Secondly ....

I will await your reply and your public apologies for the wrongdoings you have so publicly and wrongfully stated and imputed here in relation to myself in your attempt to imply I am a liar and some one who has impugned upon the rights and privacy of others all of which borders on defamation as it has been posted in such a public manner and forum.

[Minghequan]

To the Moderators,

Why is a person allowed to start a thread, make some highly questionable claims and then when the thread goes "pear-shaped" for the original poster, that poster is able to completely remove that thread and the very factual and salient points made on same?

Secondly, why is a person able to make false (and in what many countries around the world would consider at the least slanderous, bordering on defamation) statements in a thread and call upon the rules claiming politics, breaches of privacy (when such is not the occurrence). Should not that person apologise and retract said false statements as is common and best practice throughout the world or at the very least those statements removed from record?

Why is this guy even allowed to post here after being proven factually and resoundingly to be lying and misrepresenting others?

[tc101]

To the Moderators,

Why is a person allowed to start a thread, make some highly questionable claims and then when the thread goes "pear-shaped" for the original poster, that poster is able to completely remove that thread and the very factual and salient points made on same?

Secondly, why is a person able to make false (and in what many countries around the world would consider at the least slanderous, bordering on defamation) statements in a thread and call upon the rules claiming politics, breaches of privacy (when such is not the occurrence). Should not that person apologise and retract said false statements as is common and best practice throughout the world or at the very least those statements removed from record?

Why is this guy even allowed to post here after being proven factually and resoundingly to be lying and misrepresenting others?

I don't know you but I think you may want to consider that Hendrik is his own worst enemy. The more he posts the more he shows what a fraud he is. Let him talk DNA iPhone race car let him put up forged documents and quote other frauds and let him misrepresent things. The more he does the more people will catch him in his deception. All frauds have followers but I think most sensible people see Hendrik for what he is.

[LFJ]

I'd have told all of you involved to take this obnoxious crap elsewhere already. This is not offered as a platform for airing each other's dirty laundry and bickering over nonsense. If you have so much time on your hands, keep it on your Facebook like other weirdos and quit cluttering these forums.

Also, 30 lashes to the next person to post in obnoxiously bold red letters.

[Minghequan]

I don't know you but I think you may want to consider that Hendrik is his own worst enemy. The more he posts the more he shows what a fraud he is. Let him talk DNA iPhone race car let him put up forged documents and quote other frauds and let him misrepresent things. The more he does the more people will catch him in his deception. All frauds have followers but I think most sensible people see Hendrik for what he is.

TC101, That is true and I believe 100% correct and factual but the problem with this if he is not properly called upon for his statements regarding well known and reputable people within the Martial Arts who by no fault of their own get used by Hendrik in his strange attempts at his own self-validation and that of his agenda then he will simply continue on his merry and harmful (to the reputations and words of others) way.

In his "Sergio White Crane report" thread he started and then removed when his lies were brought to light, he made several statements attributed to Sergio (his friend?) and Sunny Ho (who has most likely never met) and Sifu Lee Kong (Who he quoted incorrectly and falsely) which were factually proven to be his lies thus implicating the very people he was posting about!!!

Lying about the statements of people such as Sifu Lee Kong is not nonsense but proven fact and I would be happy to take it elsewhere even to not post at all if only he would honestly own his mistakes and harmful (to the good reputations of good Martial Artists who did not want to be raised in this matter in the first place until he did so) yet proven untruths.

Why is Hendrik even allowed to post here after being proven factually and resoundingly to be lying and misrepresenting others more than just once but multiple and multiple times???

LFJ, Okay I agree with you about the posting in "red" .... but the idea of whips kinda excites me!!! (it's a joke!). :)

[GeneChing]

I ban everyone. 'cept for the mods, of course. You gentleman must sort your differences amicably or you can't play here anymore.

[Wayfaring]

He said "gentlemen". He must be lost. :D:D:D

[Faux Newbie]

I'd ban the mods, too. Quadraphenia and all.

[Faux Newbie]

To the Moderators,

Why is a person allowed to start a thread, make some highly questionable claims and then when the thread goes "pear-shaped" for the original poster, that poster is able to completely remove that thread and the very factual and salient points made on same?

Secondly, why is a person able to make false (and in what many countries around the world would consider at the least slanderous, bordering on defamation) statements in a thread and call upon the rules claiming politics, breaches of privacy (when such is not the occurrence). Should not that person apologise and retract said false statements as is common and best practice throughout the world or at the very least those statements removed from record?

Why is this guy even allowed to post here after being proven factually and resoundingly to be lying and misrepresenting others?

You know as well as others that forum mods are part time and volunteer. It is unreasonable to expect them to make people apologize for other people. And both slander and defamation require proof of damages. You don't have that.

They did allow you to post your rebuttal in threads that had nothing to do with it. That seems fair, considering that even that can be disruptive to the conversations of others.

Your right to put out what you see as the truth in regards to something does not trump other people's right to discuss a specific topic. If the mods force him to apologize to you, then they have to force you to apologize to those whose threads may be derailed in the pursuit of your cause, we'll all be apologizing all day. And then only John will be discussing Wing Chun.

Originally I saw a problem with this idea. Not so much anymore.

Really, the stuff that makes you mad is like a fifth that John clearly simply shakes off every day. I've not seen him argue or flame against people who make preposterous claims, and he puts out the content because of this. Even when others have valid reasons they think he's wrong, he defends his point without following them around from thread to thread or flame wars. I'm pretty sure he's a bot.

[anerlich]

I have full permission to post Sifu Lee Kong's comments on this issue! He has stated in full that he is ok with me stating this and in getting his message out. I am more than willing to sign the required Legal Documentation to this effect and then publish same here!

Well you don't have my permission to publish same cr@p here, so kindly cease and desist.

If you want to talk about just about ANYTHING else, that is OK.

[Faux Newbie]

I think a good rule of thumb is if you realize that you and two or three other people are arguing with a group of two or three others everywhere, even if YOU have a legitimate gripe, the others probably don't. I sympathize with issues between individuals, but don't sympathize with roving bands who think they are protecting the universe while totally disrupting other people's time on the forum.

[Minghequan]

So ..... Your saying you support Hendrik lies?

[Faux Newbie]

So ..... Your saying you support Hendrik lies?

No, though I don't actually know or care what they are at this point. Considering that no one is really paying attention, I'm not sure what damage is done.

Nor do I support your forgetting that you don't have any right to expect others to take up something YOU chose to do. You choose to do it, make separate threads for it, but just because a thread other people are on happens to have Hendrick appear on it does not mean your derailing those other people's time on the forum is okay.

Wanna get involved in my arguments about politics with my brother-in-law in every thread you go to? No? There's a reason.

This forum isn't yours. It is public. The best way it functions is if people ignore people they consider trolls, deal with situations that involve claims without imposing on other members, and otherwise try to keep things on topic to a reasonable degree.

As I said before in response to your question on the other thread, if you have no set number of threads that you can intercede in to counter Hendrick without thinking that you are unfairly involving others that have nothing to do with it, then, in regards to others besides Hendrick, you are simply not in the right in your belief that your goals on the forum supersede everyone else's.

[Minghequan]

Hendrik starts a thread wrongly quotes Sifu lee Kong, and wrongly states that Sifu Lee Kong personally endorses Sergio to teach White Crane and then when found to be telling complete lies, Hendrik quickly deletes the entire thread so no trace of the facts can be viewed by anyone seeking to know the truth!

And that is what is wrong here. Hendrik should not be able to start a thread to push his barrow and then when said thread goes 'pear-shaped " for Hendrik because of his lies ... wham bam he deletes it ads if nothing happened!

How is deleting threads allowing people around here can figure out who is who?

I'm not on a witch-hunt here but I am concerned that when someone is clearly telling outright lies and fabrication and then factually proven to be telling lies ... those facts can simply be erased by the person telling the lies because that person got caught out red-handed!!!

[GlennR]

Hendrik starts a thread wrongly quotes Sifu lee Kong, and wrongly states that Sifu Lee Kong personally endorses Sergio to teach White Crane and then when found to be telling complete lies, Hendrik quickly deletes the entire thread so no trace of the facts can be viewed by anyone seeking to know the truth!

And that is what is wrong here. Hendrik should not be able to start a thread to push his barrow and then when said thread goes 'pear-shaped " for Hendrik because of his lies ... wham bam he deletes it ads if nothing happened!

How is deleting threads allowing people around here can figure out who is who?

I'm not on a witch-hunt here but I am concerned that when someone is clearly telling outright lies and fabrication and then factually proven to be telling lies ... those facts can simply be erased by the person telling the lies because that person got caught out red-handed!!!

Ron, youve made your point

Give it a rest.......... its getting tedious now

[anerlich]

So ..... Your saying you support Hendrik lies?

No, I'm saying I'm far beyond caring what else either of you may have to say to each other.

[Minghequan]

Yes I agree the point has been made and clarified by myself elsewhere on the forum. I consider the matter closed having factually shown Hendrik for what he truly is.

I will now leave it up to Hendrick to further expose himself.

Perhaps the Moderators could close this thread before it gets removed?

[GeneChing]

He said "gentlemen". He must be lost. :D:D:D Just sarcastic. It's the WC forum. How seriously can you take this stuff? :rolleyes:

[GeneChing]

I guess my comment on the previous thread (http://www.kungfumagazine.com/forum/showthread.php?67735-To-the-moderator-enough-is-enough&p=1270650#post1270650) wasn't sufficient. But obviously, y'all aren't good listeners (or readers to be exact) which is terribly bothersome for a publisher like myself. It reiterates the old saying 'pearls before swine'.

The mods don't create drama. If anything, they are editors here. They delete and lock threads when they become so ridiculously catty that they are no longer amusing, even in that 'look at that member show his arse' sort of way. And they help me ban members that are just too cluttering. And our standards are pretty lenient. We allow for a lot. It takes a real clown to get banned here. And from the looks of things right now, we got a lot of clowns here. It's a cyclical thing, especially in the WC forum. Clown season. It's sort of like spring, but instead of blooming buds, we get ranting clowns.

It's a poor sportsman and a fool that blames the mods. Posting here is like stepping into a virtual ring. You spar. Sometimes you win. Sometimes you lose. Sometimes you get a bad judge making a bad call, but it was your choice to step in the ring, your choice to be judged. Don't be a sore loser when you get banned. Just find another ring to spar in. It's a world wide web. Maybe you can find one where the mods are easily bribed. :p

[JPinAZ]

I guess my comment on the previous thread (http://www.kungfumagazine.com/forum/showthread.php?67735-To-the-moderator-enough-is-enough&p=1270650#post1270650) wasn't sufficient. But obviously, y'all aren't good listeners (or readers to be exact) which is terribly bothersome for a publisher like myself. It reiterates the old saying 'pearls before swine'.

The mods don't create drama. If anything, they are editors here. They delete and lock threads when they become so ridiculously catty that they are no longer amusing, even in that 'look at that member show his arse' sort of way. And they help me ban members that are just too cluttering. And our standards are pretty lenient. We allow for a lot. It takes a real clown to get banned here. And from the looks of things right now, we got a lot of clowns here. It's a cyclical thing, especially in the WC forum. Clown season. It's sort of like spring, but instead of blooming buds, we get ranting clowns.

It's a poor sportsman and a fool that blames the mods. Posting here is like stepping into a virtual ring. You spar. Sometimes you win. Sometimes you lose. Sometimes you get a bad judge making a bad call, but it was your choice to step in the ring, your choice to be judged. Don't be a sore loser when you get banned. Just find another ring to spar in. It's a world wide web. Maybe you can find one where the mods are easily bribed. :p

LOL, spot on - this is a very good and clear post! (funny too :))

[lkfmdc]

Oh my, arguments in the wing chun forum, who knew :rolleyes:

The good news, this forum makes the main forum look like a closed academic review session....

Keep on wing chunning...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoXu6QmxpJE

[David Jamieson]

To the OP, I agree, enough is enough.

Keep your bickering in this sandbox please.

You guys do realize that this section is the most contentious one here right?
You guys argue a lot.

You should all meet up, beat the everloving crap out of each other and whoever comes out on top can say what he likes and the rest have to stfu.

makes sense right?

make it so. I honestly fear being the guy who has to clean out this sub forum.... lol

Also I feel kind of sorry for the mod who has hung in there and tried to deal with you maniacs for all this time.
I probably would have asked Gene to ban a lot of you by now if I could be bothered to pay much attention to this rambling weird ass ranting that goes on in here.

Out!

[Wayfaring]

I guess my comment on the previous thread (http://www.kungfumagazine.com/forum/showthread.php?67735-To-the-moderator-enough-is-enough&p=1270650#post1270650) wasn't sufficient. But obviously, y'all aren't good listeners (or readers to be exact) which is terribly bothersome for a publisher like myself. It reiterates the old saying 'pearls before swine'.

The mods don't create drama. If anything, they are editors here. They delete and lock threads when they become so ridiculously catty that they are no longer amusing, even in that 'look at that member show his arse' sort of way. And they help me ban members that are just too cluttering. And our standards are pretty lenient. We allow for a lot. It takes a real clown to get banned here. And from the looks of things right now, we got a lot of clowns here. It's a cyclical thing, especially in the WC forum. Clown season. It's sort of like spring, but instead of blooming buds, we get ranting clowns.

It's a poor sportsman and a fool that blames the mods. Posting here is like stepping into a virtual ring. You spar. Sometimes you win. Sometimes you lose. Sometimes you get a bad judge making a bad call, but it was your choice to step in the ring, your choice to be judged. Don't be a sore loser when you get banned. Just find another ring to spar in. It's a world wide web. Maybe you can find one where the mods are easily bribed. :p

Yes, angry clowns are very disturbing...

8663

[Wayfaring]

Just sarcastic. It's the WC forum. How seriously can you take this stuff? :rolleyes:

I agree. It is the int3rn3tz.

[Minghequan]

It's a poor sportsman and a fool that blames the mods.

There you go Hendrik, .... a bit foolish perhaps?

[Dragonzbane76]

You should all meet up, beat the everloving crap out of each other and whoever comes out on top can say what he likes and the rest have to stfu.

Kinda like thunderdome.

gene you could be master blaster

8674

[GeneChing]

I feel more like this guy.

http://www.granateseed.com/futilepodcast/wp-content/uploads/mad_max_beyond_thunderdome.jpg

:o

[Paddington]

Gene, one solution to a lot of these issues is to allow the person that started the thread to moderate it. You can set up forum privileges like that. If you are serious about allowing us to moderate ourselves and affording us the greatest degree of freedom possible, then this is perhaps the best solution.

[Vajramusti]

Gene, one solution to a lot of these issues is to allow the person that started the thread to moderate it. You can set up forum privileges like that. If you are serious about allowing us to moderate ourselves and affording us the greatest degree of freedom possible, then this is perhaps the best solution.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dunno about that. We have had some history with that. One person used to start threads and deleted them when things didn't go his way.
Careful- what you wish for!!

[GeneChing]

Paddington, you expect us to set up individual admin accounts for every member so they can edit their own threads here? That's silly. If people want to have that much control over what they say on the web, they have no place in a forum like this. They should go here (http://wordpress.org/).

The solution is to ban. That's quick and easy.

[Faux Newbie]

The solution is to ban. That's quick and easy.

Or, before it gets to that, for members to keep their stuff in the right threads, recognize that no one here owes anyone else here anything, and enjoy the forum.

The people who enjoy constant flame wars are not the majority.

[lkfmdc]

There is always the "Omega Exception" where Gene makes me moderator of the wing chung forum

I'd clean this place up in no time......


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

I'd get rid of all the wing chun people

[Dragonzbane76]

You have to destroy before you can create.

[Paddington]

Paddington, you expect us to set up individual admin accounts for every member so they can edit their own threads here? That's silly. If people want to have that much control over what they say on the web, they have no place in a forum like this. They should go here (http://wordpress.org/).

The solution is to ban. That's quick and easy.

No, I am not suggesting that. I believe there are modules and settings so that the OP of the thread automatically gets mod rights just for his / her thread. With PHPbb, it is the case of enabling a simple script and again, it is not an admin right and only applies to the thread the person started. There is absolutely no maintenance as it is all handled automatically.

[Sihing73]

No, I am not suggesting that. I believe there are modules and settings so that the OP of the thread automatically gets mod rights just for his / her thread. With PHPbb, it is the case of enabling a simple script and again, it is not an admin right and only applies to the thread the person started. There is absolutely no maintenance as it is all handled automatically.

Currently the OP is able to delete the thread, which some have done when things do not go their way.
I am not sure how this would go over as the person starting the thread would be able to delete posts from those "they" did not like regardless of content or relevance.
Or making their thread a sticky or locking the thread when things do not go their way.
I have, in the past, un-deleted threads because, while the OP, was no longer happy others had put in "valuable" insight.

To be honest, everyone here already has the option of contacting a moderator and report posts. Unfortunately, very few take advantage of doing so.

I see several potential issues as there is no way everyone will be happy. I can see someone complaining because the OP did something they did not like.

Look at this thread, started by one person who seems to think they are in the right and most others are wrong.

Enough is enough, but others could argue that the OP is guilty of the same thing.........just saying ;)

Heck, here in the WC forum it seems like some people will complain and argue if you tell them the sun provides light. :rolleyes:

[lkfmdc]

We had to destroy the wing chun forum in order to save it

[Paddington]

Currently the OP is able to delete the thread, which some have done when things do not go their way.
I am not sure how this would go over as the person starting the thread would be able to delete posts from those "they" did not like regardless of content or relevance.
Or making their thread a sticky or locking the thread when things do not go their way.
I have, in the past, un-deleted threads because, while the OP, was no longer happy others had put in "valuable" insight.

To be honest, everyone here already has the option of contacting a moderator and report posts. Unfortunately, very few take advantage of doing so.

I see several potential issues as there is no way everyone will be happy. I can see someone complaining because the OP did something they did not like.

Look at this thread, started by one person who seems to think they are in the right and most others are wrong.

Enough is enough, but others could argue that the OP is guilty of the same thing.........just saying ;)

Heck, here in the WC forum it seems like some people will complain and argue if you tell them the sun provides light. :rolleyes:

I clearly expressed a want for moderation in the thread I started and where I was called a wanker and, to be quite frank, ganged up on and had my thread derailed. The response was along the lines of 'get over it' so from my perspective, expressing concern to a moderator made not one bit of difference. You can set it so the OP can just delete his or her thread and any posts within said thread that they feel need moderating and that is it.

They would not be able to add stickies etc. just the permissions that I state. If the OP acted like a fascist when such permissions were enabled, then they would soon find that no one wants to converse with them in the thread and you would have a better Darwinian state in these sub forums. But anyway, I am forming the opinion that the management do not really want a functioning sub forum where we can increase the output of constructive threads and participation levels. That is fine by me as I can, at the end of the day, put up with all the negativity but it is becoming clear that there are some who have an agenda to derail and it stems from a wider attempt to just bash wing chun more generally online.

[GlennR]

I clearly expressed a want for moderation in the thread I started and where I was called a wanker and, to be quite frank, ganged up on and had my thread derailed. The response was along the lines of 'get over it' so from my perspective, expressing concern to a moderator made not one bit of difference. You can set it so the OP can just delete his or her thread and any posts within said thread that they feel need moderating and that is it.

You were looking down your nose at anyone that didn't use 7 syllable words............ ill say it again, get over yourself


They would not be able to add stickies etc. just the permissions that I state. If the OP acted like a fascist when such permissions were enabled, then they would soon find that no one wants to converse with them in the thread and you would have a better Darwinian state in these sub forums. But anyway, I am forming the opinion that the management do not really want a functioning sub forum where we can increase the output of constructive threads and participation levels. That is fine by me as I can, at the end of the day, put up with all the negativity but it is becoming clear that there are some who have an agenda to derail and it stems from a wider attempt to just bash wing chun more generally online.

No, that's not the case. Just because someone doesn't agree with you (and Keith, and Hendrick etc) doesn't mean they are bashing WC.

They're simply disagreeing with you.
So once more, get over yourself.

ps. See, i didnt even call you a wanker this time

[Paddington]

You were looking down your nose at anyone that didn't use 7 syllable words............ ill say it again, get over yourself



No, that's not the case. Just because someone doesn't agree with you (and Keith, and Hendrick etc) doesn't mean they are bashing WC.

They're simply disagreeing with you.
So once more, get over yourself.

ps. See, i didnt even call you a wanker this time

I didn't do that GlennR, that is just your imagination fueled by your inferiority complex thinking that. My point of contention in that thread was that people had not read my posts nor read the clarifications I made and that they were contradicting themselves. As I demolished each false criticism people jumped to another one that they thought easier to beat me down with. Failing at each of these people bottomed out and moved to say things such as 'you are being snobbish, looking down your nose' etc. My comment on bashing wing chun was more a general observation and separate from my concerns with the thread I started.

[KPM]

I didn't do that GlennR, that is just your imagination fueled by your inferiority complex thinking that. My point of contention in that thread was that people had not read my posts nor read the clarifications I made and that they were contradicting themselves. As I demolished each false criticism people jumped to another one that they thought easier to beat me down with. Failing at each of these people bottomed out and moved to say things such as 'you are being snobbish, looking down your nose' etc. My comment on bashing wing chun was more a general observation and separate from my concerns with the thread I started.

Paddington is correct. Just because you weren't reading closely Glenn and didn't follow what he was saying is no reason to accuse him of "looking down his nose" at others. And at least some of the recent WC bashing took place on the "Way Forward" thread, and you took part in that yourself Glenn. It had nothing to do with having a differing opinion about our WC. But I know what will come next. So go ahead and prove your maturity level by calling us "wankers" and telling us to "get over ourselves" like usual. Oh...and don't forget the wonderful video of Mr. Chopper! ;)

[GlennR]

Paddington is correct. Just because you weren't reading closely Glenn and didn't follow what he was saying is no reason to accuse him of "looking down his nose" at others. And at least some of the recent WC bashing took place on the "Way Forward" thread, and you took part in that yourself Glenn. It had nothing to do with having a differing opinion about our WC. But I know what will come next. So go ahead and prove your maturity level by calling us "wankers" and telling us to "get over ourselves" like usual. Oh...and don't forget the wonderful video of Mr. Chopper! ;)

You're missing the point, i never "bashed' WC........... i bashed you and your mate.

Maybe you two should try reading my posts?

Oh, and the Chopper thing, was an attempt at a bit of humour. Sorry i upset you boys

[GlennR]

I didn't do that GlennR, that is just your imagination fueled by your inferiority complex thinking that.

And there you go again, are you the Sigmund Freud of the forum now?


My point of contention in that thread was that people had not read my posts nor read the clarifications I made and that they were contradicting themselves.

I acknowledged that, ask for clarification, got ignored.


As I demolished each false criticism people jumped to another one that they thought easier to beat me down with.

Bwahahah....... shall we now call you "The Demolisher!!!"..... scourge of all internet trolls!

[Paddington]

.

And there you go again, are you the Sigmund Freud of the forum now?



I acknowledged that, ask for clarification, got ignored.



Bwahahah....... shall we now call you "The Demolisher!!!"..... scourge of all internet trolls!

I did clarify several times in that thread when other people asked. I saw little point repeating myself just for you, given that you could not be bothered to keep up with the posts in that thread. You are not that special GlennR and I fail to see why I should have to take special measures in your case. My one year old daughter also goes boo hoo too, when I ignore her.

If you you want to take up your issues with me privately then please feel free to PM me rather than following me from thread to thread like some starved mosquito, looking for yet more blood to consume.

EDIT: There is a film that chronicles Chopper's exploits, it is really good GlennR and full of memes that you could use.

[GlennR]

I did clarify several times in that thread when other people asked. I saw little point repeating myself just for you, given that you could not be bothered to keep up with the posts in that thread. You are not that special GlennR and I fail to see why I should have to take special measures in your case. My one year old daughter also goes boo hoo too, when I ignore her.

If you you want to take up your issues with me privately then please feel free to PM me rather than following me from thread to thread like some starved mosquito, looking for yet more blood to consume.

EDIT: There is a film that chronicles Chopper's exploits, it is really good GlennR and full of memes that you could use.

Just replying to you moaning about being told to get over yourself and being called a wanker. I'm obviously special enough to remember my jibes at you, or do other people call you a wanker ad well?
To many to remember?

And I'll pass on the pm, I don't have any issues with, I just think you're a wanker.... Pretty simple really

Oh, and thanks for the chopper advice, but I think you'll find I can source my own material thanks....

Like this.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLGgr_Pz3Rk

Enjoy!

[Wayfaring]

I didn't do that GlennR, that is just your imagination fueled by your inferiority complex thinking that. My point of contention in that thread was that people had not read my posts nor read the clarifications I made and that they were contradicting themselves. As I demolished each false criticism people jumped to another one that they thought easier to beat me down with. Failing at each of these people bottomed out and moved to say things such as 'you are being snobbish, looking down your nose' etc. My comment on bashing wing chun was more a general observation and separate from my concerns with the thread I started.

Really? His "imagination fueled by his inferiority complex" ????? Is that your official psychological diagnosis there, doctor?

I mean your diagnosis seems to be agreed upon by your other consulting physician on the thread, KPM. But no, I disagree with the consulting opinion. Paddington is not "right". Paddington seems to be confused as to the appropriate time to do psychological diagnosis. Hint - not when you are in an argument on the internetz.

[KPM]

Really? His "imagination fueled by his inferiority complex" ????? Is that your official psychological diagnosis there, doctor?

I mean your diagnosis seems to be agreed upon by your other consulting physician on the thread, KPM. But no, I disagree with the consulting opinion. Paddington is not "right". Paddington seems to be confused as to the appropriate time to do psychological diagnosis. Hint - not when you are in an argument on the internetz.

Well, whatever you want to call it WF....the fact remains that Glenn wasn't reading along on that thread very closely and wasn't following what Paddington was saying. Glenn's assessment was that Paddington was "looking down his nose" at everyone else. Paddington's assessment was that Glenn was imagining things based on an inferiority complex. Why is Paddington's "diagnosis" any less valid than Glenn's?

[GeneChing]

You guys are just precious. :p

[lkfmdc]

You guys are just precious. :p

Time for the "Omega Exception" I say......

[GlennR]

You guys are just precious. :p

Ofcourse we are!!!!