Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hendrik
IMHHHHHHHHHHHHo,
Isnt it attached means " let his attack passed and using the his strike to seal himself off ".
one can be very close range with body contact one can be far way without body contact. but one always let him passed and using him to seal himself off.
That is the WCK way.
That is ONE of the tactics WCK uses. It is not the exclusive tactic (it doesn't work in every situation) for "entering".
Quote:
and WCner suppose to be good in this because WCner keeping drilling this with Chi Sao, Chi Gek, Chi Po (step) it is just the WCK way of Door opening. Chi doesnt mean stick. Chi in modern language means Control. and the WCK way of control is " let his attack passed and using the his strike to seal himself off ". isnt that Lay Lau Hoi Song Lat Sau Jek Choong?
That is ONE way to lai lao hoi soong.
Quote:
In addition, Kiu as in the Kiu Sau, the Bridge is just the contact point. Most southern TCMA has a fix Kiu Sau or Bridge or contact point handling method. WCK prefer Adaptive control of the contact point based on purpose instead of shape. Thus, a Tan Sau, when the bridge is touch, It could be having a different purpose based on the situation and condition of the manupulate of the force vector to implement " let his attack passed and using the his strike to seal himself off " , it is not a Tan Kiu as in other southern art where one needs to always cross the bridge and attack. WCK doesnt need to attack directly, in fact wCK prefer to not attack directly but using your own attack to control your center line before WCner go and finished the job. Thus , that is what i mean, WCK doesnt attact the center line directly but indirectly.
No, it depends on your what your opponent is doing.
And, I think that you really shouldn't speak as to what other TCMAs do or don't do -- my experience is that when people do that they generally speak from ignorance.
Quote:
So, the number one job of a WCner is to master all different variation of " let his attack passed and using the his strike to seal himself off ". that simple, just one goal. and ofcorse, the rest the power generation.....structures... the center line....... is to support the WCK way but not the WCK way.
No, no, no, no, no. That tactic has limited usefulness in fighting.
Quote:
So, different art play they way they are good at WCner play the way they are good at. and if we WCner doesnt master this WCK way. what are we doing?
Figthing needs a strategy which one is good at. and if one is not clear with this strategy and having all the tool needs and the drill needs what is one doing? so are you invincible if you have these all? no ofcause not. your opponent might be Oyama or Mohamad Ali or someone who doesnt know how to punch.
Your argument would carry more weight if YOU got in the ring with boxers, MMA fighters, MT fighters, etc. and tried it. WCK gives us a general strategic battle plan or method and the tools (movement/actions and tactics) for carrying out that plan. In terms of "entering" to the inside, the "let his attack passed and using the his strike to seal himself off" is just ONE of many tactics. If you get in there and try it, you'll see that I am telling you the truth. No one tactic works in all situations. Most tactics have limited usefulness, and the "key" -- you seem so fond of keys -- is learning through fighting which ones work for you and in what circumstances.