Originally Posted by
LFJ
First of all, I don't know how these two can even be compared. The "nanquan" guy didn't hardly do a thing that resembled martial arts, much less a practical one. He should be compared to a figure skater, since he did mostly axel jumps and salchows, plus some dance poses.
Why is "complexity" included in your comparison? The Shaolin form was not made up by him, and complexity is not a virtue in martial arts. The more complex the less practical in most cases.
You say he is better at controlling the form at high speed, better paced, and has superior physical posture?
What is your basis for judging that? Where in the Shaolin form was it not well-controlled or what postures were not executed as well? I've never seen anyone do this form better, and the pace was as it should be. It's not a zixuan taolu.