Quote:
1, Snake in WCK is not my theories. it is all over WCK lineages since ancient time.
Its mentioned in a story about a Nun watch one fight a snake. Maybe it has some lost meaning but at the end of the day its a fable
Quote:
2, it is not snake taichi but Emei.
I missed a comma.... but i think you got my drift
Quote:
3, we are discussing dynamic structure here,
with motion analysis, All the three WCK form or set, has the Emei DNA. it is not Hung Gar or Shao Lin. That is a FACT.
The post is "what is structure to you", ive made my points as has everyone else in regards to that. Technical applicable points.
Youve dragged out your old "emei internal snake" wagon again, you belittle eveyone elses opnion, and try to get some loose association with Sean's friend after her insightful observation to boost your story.... again
Oh, Emei is NOT a fact.......... its your theory
Quote:
If you dont buy it, go a head, get the motion analysis expert to do an analysis.
No, the best measurement of applied structure is from the guy i sparred last night.
Quote:
Do you have anything to offer instead of keep posting off track to attack me?
You know what, i must admit i probabbly do hound you too much... but ill stop when you stop your condascending self serving attitude. Deal?
Quote:
Just get this straight ; I notice from your posts against me, that started
since a few months ago, when Navin asking for my opinion, and I comment TST's clip is good for demo but not real internal art such as other TCMA IMA, you hold my technical view against me.
and since then you keep posting attack.
Im sure i criticised you before that. Incidentally, i said TST had structure which you said didnt meet your TCMA criteria, im interested in the result whilst you are interested in the way as is TST id say
Quote:
If you dont like my comment, that is for Navin and not you any way.
If you like to invite TST here, I am not shy to tell him what my view is and let him and me have a friendly technically discussion.
or if you dont like it, go a head, send the TST clip and the CXW clip to a Motion analist and let them tell you what is TST clip shows compare with the CXW clip.
I could be right, I could be wrong. I am willing to be wrong if the motion analist tell me so. But if I am right, then could you accept you are wrong?
You dont have to agree with me, however, I dont see a point to keep attacking me just because I comment on TST's clip.
I appology if my technical view of TST make you feel hurt.
Once again, im interested in the result, the applicable result of good WC structure.
I dont give a rats **** what you or a "motion analyst" have to say about TST or any other regarded WC person. Its the result that matters within the confines of the WC structure. I dont care about lineage, stories... all that stuff, its interesting for a chat but thats it.
You, however, are obsessed with the way of getting there..... you cant show us a single result, not one, yet you are happy to tell everyone your way is the right/original way.
Youre lost
I hope this post of opening up the root cause put an end to this issue