Quote:
No need to explain again. But everyone thinks they have the secret sauce. If you met a current student of Clive Potter and asked him if Clive teaches good, accurate, comprehensive WSL VT, he/she would probably say 'Yes!"
You never give up do you? :rolleyes:
Yes a student of Clive Potter would think he was right until he met PB.
Quote:
Ask the same lineage-based question to any student, from any lineage, and you will hardly ever hear the response: "Well, I like what I train but I realize it is more to do with the abilities and personality of my teacher, than about it being accurate, good, comprehensive VT."
Yes but I chose to investigate. Many don't or don't feel the need to. I wasn't happy with my previous Wing Chun. I thought it was all sh1t.
Quote:
For example, I get the impression you cannot comprehend how PB might have missed something, not been taught something, misinterpreted something, etc. He's clearly very talented, but you can't know that he got the full picture (just like we can't know that David Peterson did, etc etc).
I've yet to find something he may have missed. I'm the one that keeps making discoveries and the more I find out the more I stand by what I say.
Quote:
In short: There's more than one way to skin a cat. What's the right way? Many ways might be right - different, but right.
yes but when it comes to VT I want to know I'm practicing the best with no gaps and any questions or uncertainties. many of the explanations about WC on this forum sound like people are just fumbling around in the dark.
Quote:
The only constant that is always wrong, always making a mistake, always getting things ar*e backwards... is Graham. :D
If you say so but I'm yet to read anything you write that makes sense. :rolleyes: