So why are you reading this if you don't need info?
Mckind 13 wrote:
You are not a knowledgeable enough student of HFY to discuss these topics. That’s fine, I really don't need any answers from you or anyone in the HFY family. I was trying to open up discussion but I guess Tom is correct.
David,
You are not qualified to say who is "knowledgeable enough" or not to discuss HFY. You say you do not need any answers from HFY family etc... LOL! So what are you doing here? Trying to "open up discussion"? ROFLOL! your attempt to bully and demand things only reflects on you and does not motivate anyone to "open discussion" I know you know this so what is your real goal in posting on this thread? and when you do gain information on HFY and add it to your understanding will you ever give credit where it is due? can you explain where some of the aspects of what you practice came from? Especially since it does not look like Koolau or Moy Yat or anything Hawkins Cheung ever has presented or anything like what is listed as the sources? ROFLOL! Where did the Chi sau methods come from and why do they look alot like reworded version of the 14 kiu sau methods of Chi sim? Why didn't the Chi Sim lineage get credit for this information? I know is it just a coincidence that there are 14 kiu sau and 14 chi sau methods! LOL! So let's stop before it get's ugly again.
:D