Kung Fu and the UFC, which is more reality based?

"The wrong assumption that if a kungfu school spars, knows some shuai chiao, and does San Shou, that means they can be as good as Boxing, wrestling, BJJ, or Muay Thai. ."


No, but a shuai chiao school that boxes and fights on the ground can be as good as what you listed above. Ive fought with people from MMA, BJJ, and Muay thai camps and done just fine.

"What makes someone potentially dangerous is not what they know, how well they know it, and not how many years they have spent training. What makes someone dangerous is how far they are willing to go when the punches start to fly. "

Ok... So lets say that Im more than happy to stomp on your jugular and rip out your eyes then skull **** you, but Im only 5' and 130 lbs, and know nothing about fighting. Well say you on the other hand are a "sport fighter" with a record of 10-0, and are 5'10 and 165 lbs, but you dont really want to hurt the other guy too bad. Who wins?
:rolleyes:

I said it makes them "potentially dangerous."

What is an imaginary technique?

From my perspective, in a more barbaric time, techniques such tiger claws were used, that is why they are part of KF systems.
The fact that we live in a more civilized world doesnt erase the knowledge of the past.

Perhaps it is your understanding of the application.

If I can hit you, I can tiger claw you just as easy. I fail to see the mistique about it.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reemul


From my perspective, in a more barbaric time, techniques such tiger claws were used.

---

From your 'perspective'?! Do you major in imaginary history as well?

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reemul


Perhaps it is your understanding of the application.

---

What application? You've never applied it!

but I do know enough about physics and biology to what can damage the human body.

so I ask again to please define an imaginary technique.

Ya know I haven't been to the forums in a long time and I just now realize I got baited into a BS discussion.

All right ya got me.
good one

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reemul
but I do know enough about physics and biology to what can damage the human body.

---

So, you can imagine what a technique you've never used or even practiced would theoretically do.

come on now, I'm not going to fall for it again.
give it up

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reemul
come on now, I'm not going to fall for it again.
give it up

---

If this is your way of admitting you are wrong, I accept.

In order to prove one wrong you must provide an absolute proof to the contrary of the opposing position.

Im afraid personal belief doesn't count. Even a few examples to support your postion does not qualify as proof. If you think you can, please continue.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reemul

Im afraid personal belief doesn't count.

---

You'd better hope it does, Theory-Boy!

Bring the proof any time.

Because until you do, all you have is nothing but theory as well
theoryboy#2

Oh no his own argument bites him in the a$$.

oh the humility must be unbarable.:eek:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reemul
Bring the proof any time.

Because until you do, all you have is nothing but theory as well
theoryboy#2

---

"Bring the proof" of your untested theories and imaginary applications? Yeah, that makes sense. You really got me there. :rolleyes:


Just how many straws are you hoping to grasp with this line of unreasoning?

You said my "theories" are wack

prove it.