I win! I drove him off! You may all thank me later...
Printable View
Oh, the simple thinking continues to run rampant. How is that I could know if there is a decent counterargument, if I don't actually open the thread? You haven't driven me off of anything. Nor has anyone else. All I've done is said that I'll reply to a decent counterargument. Paying attention would be a big step up for you.
its not their fault if the find u amusing now is it
they diswcussed it
determined that ur full of **** and gave out the appropriate mockery
are u mocking his mocking skills ?Quote:
I've seen wittier comebacks in the junk in the tissues when I've blown my nose, while having a really bad cold.
ah ah ah bad boyyyy
so now we aree common folk ?Quote:
It is the height of hubris to think that just because you, anyone you know of or think you know can't do something, that there is no way any one could do it.
The reasoning of the common folk is so much easier to work with than reality.
and that makes you what ?
not common ?
above us maybe?
maybe his evidence is plain common senseQuote:
Ha! When you call evidence 'because I say so' and the rest of the claimed evidence is mockery, this is when I feel pity instead of sympathy.
common sense from common folk i guess huh ?
are u pitying us because we have different views and u are so far above ?
jesus christ get over yourself
theres a peanut gallery ?Quote:
If there really was a decent counterargument to what I said out of any of the posts here, I'd actually consider it. The peanut gallery throwing food and booing is not evidence.
i just thought it was a group of ppl who all felt the same was about ur BS
so everyone who's argument is against yours is part of the peanut galleryQuote:
Did you really think the peanut gallery was capable of anything other than mockery and name calling? That's very sad for you. That is precisely what the peanut gallery is for.
tht must be a very large crowd
its weird how we all feel the same way
yes where as u just try to convince yourself that u agree with youQuote:
The usual thinking of those that require others to agree with them to make themselves feel better about their views. I've seen it a lot in my life. It leads to nowhere because it's a crutch.
and now u are free from the crutch of similar likeminded ppl who feel the same way on a subject
will u teach me ?
i have already explained my niews on this peanut galleryQuote:
Of course, when you only take the few things I've said. I've already stated that this was only a part of what is require. To explain the rest would have taken more time. But, everyone else in this thread didn't want to take the time. They preferred to be more like the peanut gallery.
This, too, is not on me either.
on another note
who wants peanuts ?
u dont know these ppl u cant pass judgement on the state of their mindsQuote:
When one shows they have no desire to be and chooses flame baiting and other forms of fallacious logic, they demonstrate for all that they are not open minded. Actually proving and then, mockery is another issue completely. They couldn't even do that. And I do mean actually proving. Not this pansy a$$ 'it's true because I say so' drivel.
are u saying i have fallacious logic ? :eek: i'm offended how dare u mock me in this honest discussion
and its not true or false at all its opinions
u keep talking about how we should all give evidence
well we cant
we just all have a sense of reason and agree with each other
so what ?
ur the only person that can give evidence here
make a video of u getting elbowed in the face and not going limp
then examine the results
then wait a bit
and get elbowed in the face and use ur whole limpness thing
and look at the results with an impartial MT guy being the guy to elbow u both times
if ur right then it will be self evident
lack of bruising non broken nose
etc
so the definition is logicalQuote:
It's a definition based on logic. Your problem is with logic. Go call it names.
so what he says makes perfect sense ?
yay
thats fair if u dont want sycophants u sure picked the right placeQuote:
You've missed where I've said I don't have a problem with anyone not agreeing with me. As well as deliberately ignoring what I have said in this thread alone. I don't want followers. I hate sychophants, like those that have been posting in this thread. I have no need for a peanut gallery.
hell ppl are saying the direct opposite of wht u are saying
is that a threat ?Quote:
Then, you choose to remain in ignorance. One day, the swift hammer of the truth will hit you on the head.
calling someone a 4th grader is mockingQuote:
Given that you can't even be accurate about anything I've said, it is no surprise you're having problems with the truth. And given that I have spent enough time slumming with the common folk of those that have posted in this thread, I have repeatedly shown that I have yet to see anything resembling a true counterargument. That all I get is responses that are all the way down there with 4th graders.
hypocrite
and everyone has adressed what was said and mocked u for what u said because they found it amusing
argue back it is an argument after all its
i almost cried a littleQuote:
So, until there actually is a true counterargument in this thread against what I've said, I see no reason to revisit this one anymore.
thankyou merciful god
I wish I had more time to debate the troll, but John Takeshi showed up at EF today, and his troll fu is deep and requires much attention. Between that and the UFC, I'm all booked up tonight.
Brian
you noticed that, right? I was surprised to see him - looks like he took some people unawares at first - Iwas going to post a warning, but figured let him have some fun (that should make it apparrant how fun and games oriented I am!)
actually, I'm surprised that RonH hasn't put in an appearance there - he'd find more than enough people willing to subscribe to his outlook and / or debate him ad absurdum in a manner more to his liking
hey Ron - do us all a favor - go play with some people who will appreciate you - obviously we are just a bunch of hoi polloi ingrates:
http://www.emptyflower.com/cgi-bin/y...B.cgi/YaBB.cgi
EF guys are more savvy than you think, and I'll bust that little troll right quick if he shows up just like I did with John.
Brian
Whacha gonna do when they come for you? READ The Multiple Attacker Quandary by Phil Humphries
http://www.kungfumagazine.com//admin...ckers_Lead.jpg
How about the counter-intuitive defense of getting your back to a wall? that is, to cut down the number of attackers that can get close. One master I trained multi-attacks with even recommended backing into corners, so we would pick-off one attacker at a time...