Just because someone posts their info does not make them legit, or fraudulent. Oom Yung Doe posts all thier school info too, and they are universally recognized as the biggest frauds in US martial history.
Printable View
Just because someone posts their info does not make them legit, or fraudulent. Oom Yung Doe posts all thier school info too, and they are universally recognized as the biggest frauds in US martial history.
Well see if you post your info and it's a lie, that makes you a fraud.
If you make no claims then you can't be a fraud.
Correct.
10chrctlmt
So, someone accuses someone else of being a fraud based on what THEY know, and THEY don't have to prove that what THEY know is legit?
So their basis for fraudulent accusations is what exactly??
None of those accused seem hard to find...
Who cares if they are hard to find or not? Accessibility has noting to do with fraudulence, or legitimacy.
As of right now, all I see is a few people ( that don't mention their name ) accusing people that have put up THEIR info as being frauds, yet these accusers don't put up the "proof" they have of the fraudulent activity other than THEIR heresay, heresay that is attached to NO PERSONAL INFO.
Yeah, ok then.
I don't know J. Springer other than some of the online reading I've done. However this subject is interesting to me.
Seems this discussion is about qualification. When someone comes to my Shifu's school full of questions the first thing that will happen is my shifu will qualify that person. Who are you? What is your background? Do you desire to train under me?
If that person person will not answer these questions or has no desire to train my shifu will tell them to go away - no (or limited) questions answered by my shifu.
Why should someone divulge personal information to someone unknown or someone who refuses to identify themselves or has no desire to train under him? Usually some agenda or another is at hand in this case.
just my opinion.
ok, so with that logic, I can say,I trained with Bruce Lee, but it was a very private matter. The only other people who knew about it was James Lee, and Brandon, who was probably too young to remember anyway.
Now, your job is to dispute it and show proof.
Until then, I am the true inheritor of JKD.
Then all you have to do is demonstrate what you know.
And if I have issues with it, I will be sure to make it very clear.
You have a valid point, not saying you don't, but "that logic" as you put it, is just as good as the crap being slung here.
And yes, the burden of proof is on the accuser, since when has that changed?
here is the working link http://z15.invisionfree.com/TruthMar...267&st=0&#last
Lol..
All it took me was almost a full minute with google to answer all these questions.
http://lionsroar.name/master_john_f_springer.htm
Some people. :rolleyes: