Printable View
If you
- put both arms to guard your head, your opponent will be hard to go through your guarding arms and punch to your head.
- control your opponent's arms as shown in the following clip, since your opponent's arms are not free to attack you, you don't even need to guard your head.
It seems to me that the 2nd approach is better than the 1st approach. What's your thought?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vk06XDR9hPw
I think it is better to guard your head than have both arms on enemy unless you are going for a quick throw or push to create distance. The reason and a example In that clip you are still prone for head butts, shoulder bumps to just name a couple of attacks that you leave your self open for.
I like to control the opponents arms by intercepting and bridging. Turtling up in a boxers guard has it's place, and I will definitely go there, but if you can control the arms before they reach your head then you have so many more follow ups to choose from. Learning how to intercept and work off the bridge was one of those epiphany moments that took my fighting to another level.
Opening and closing the guard (both hands and feet) for safe entry is a very important skill, so definitely controlling vs guarding, controlling is of a higher level.
I like controlling the arms but using a guard is sometimes essential.
Situation, situation, situation....always
I can't count how many times I have seen people get drilled when engaging the clinch w/o protecting their head. In that clip YKW posted the guy isn't trying to punch him in the face. Closing the gap in an match where striking is allowed is an art in itself.
The move is called tied up with a godly rope kun sheng shen
Since you use both hands to control his both arms,
he can knee strike you.
depending on facing of course
Not saying it's easy to do. It requires some serious training. But the reward will be worthy. You may have to approach to your opponent in a different way.Quote:
Originally Posted by Syn7
He can. When he raises one of his legs to do that, that's the best time to take him down. Also since you have controlled both of his arms, his knee strike intention can be sensed by your contact. A little "shaking" can stop his knee striking in the early stage.Quote:
Originally Posted by SPJ
I hear ya. And when I said closing the gap with striking is an art in itself, I am also implying that closing the gap w/o striking is an art as well. My point is that you should be aware of the variables at all levels. For drilling, it may be useful to break these things up, but in application they must all be considered. In a real fight you need to protect your head and body when you close in and yes, when clinching, controlling the arms is important, but you still need to protect yourself in case they get a hand free. How many times have we seen guys get dropped when they focus too much on a takedown(or preventing one) and forget to guard the head. And how many times have we seen somebody get taken down because they were too focused on striking in the clinch. True martial intelligence is knowing when you can get away with sacrificing one for the other in order to gain an advantage. It most definitely goes both ways.Quote:
Originally Posted by YouKnowWho
Well said brother.Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenBrain
In Chinese wrestling, the "double inward circles" with straight arms is used to achieve that goal. When you do that, you have given away your punching ability. But you have gained the ability to be able to interrupt your opponent's punching in the early stage. This is called to fight in your opponent's territory instead of to fight in your own territory.Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenBrain
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mEVfdsRQpM&feature=youtu.be
I think there's been a formula established which is, if your opponent's arms are free - guard your head to close, then clinch and/or tie their arms up to set up a takedown. After which you sit on their chest and beat the living h3ll out of 'em.
It's probably unwise not to cover your head in striking range.
You can guard your head with your arms. You can also send your arms out to interrupt your opponent's punches in the early stage.Quote:
Originally Posted by MightyB
In battle, you will have 2 options.
- Close your castle gate and guard your castle and wait for your enemy to arrive.
- Send your troops out to surround your enemy castle. When their soldiers tries to leave their castle, you attack their soldiers right there.
To fight in your own territory or to fight in your opponent's territory, which approach is better? I prefer to use my hands to interrupt my opponent's punch when he just starts to generate speed and power. I don't like for wait for my opponent's punch to have generated speed and power and then deal with it.
One lucky punch is all it takes to say goodnight, and an extended arm is easy to avoid, bridge, or trap.Quote:
Originally Posted by YouKnowWho