Originally Posted by
Wuxia007
Sometimes I wonder if an instructor being a good fighter is more or even as important as being a good teacher.
In my experience, I have studied at a school where the instructor didn't use, or at the very least, emphasize titles. He appeared to be a very good well-trained fighter himself but failed to be able to communicate those skills well enough as a teacher for me to gain much, if anything, from his lessons.
But at another school where the instructor emphasized titles, I had no real idea if the instructor was a good fighter because he rarely, if ever, showed off his personal skills for the class. However, with that said, he had great communication and teaching skills that it didn't matter because I walked away from his lessons with the confidence that I had progressed as a martial artist.
IMO, I don't think it matters much if an instructor is a proven fighter if he can't teach it properly.
I don't know, maybe this is one of the positive sides of having a title-emphasized school system with a grandmaster in that it implies a level of teaching quality.
Would you pay tuition to attend a university that didn't emphasize structure within its school system?