Does anyone else think that 38 years for two brutal murders is way too lenient?
Does anyone else think that 38 years for two brutal murders is way too lenient?
important question is when is paroleQuote:
Originally Posted by Jimbo
dat reptilian psychopath stareQuote:
"He had a very intimidating, piercing gaze," one of his pupils told the Spanish national daily, also making reference to his mystical and spiritual tendencies.
Very true. Hopefully, 38 years doesn't end up being only 3.8 years.Quote:
Originally Posted by bawang
Yea couldn't imagine why he should get less than a life sentence.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimbo
its spain and victims were sub saharan and indio.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kellen Bassette
He confessed, reducing the adminstrative burden and costs of the trial. That probably netted him a reduction. Luckily they made the two 19-year sentences run consecutively.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kellen Bassette
Where did you get the "indio". Those victims were black or Arabs, both can be interpreted as pejorative terms. The indio is valid in Latinoamerican cultures, where Indio is considered below domestic and wild animals.Quote:
Originally Posted by bawang
Use it all the time to make gringos and mexicans squirm here haha - but they're killing indios in juarez now so hard to believe, but can't go there! Worst for central American Indio but why take chances -Quote:
Originally Posted by mig
Perhaps some people simply understand it as the word for indians and that indians are regarded as sub animals in mexico.
It mean Indian not animal - sub animal is status
Anything can be interpreted as a pejorative term. Words that used to be perfectly acceptable, even proper, are now politically incorrect because someone got offended and forced a general negative connotation to a word.Quote:
Originally Posted by mig
Language changes constantly though here the comment was made about the term wang ba dan made about "indio". In most of European countries there is clear discrimination against blacks and more against Arabs, those who do the dirty jobs. The term "indio" is used mainly in Latinoamerican countries where indios are considered less than domesticated animals even today.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kellen Bassette
"The term "indio" is used mainly in Latinoamerican countries where indios are considered less than domesticated animals even today."
Hey I hate to have to repeat this, like you repeating it makes you right when you're not, but as a Indio I am telling you:
Indio = i-n-d-i-a-n-s = indigenous people
Status of Indios in mexico = subhuman
Again, indio means Indian. Only. By insisting that it itself is the insult you are not only being ignorant, but insulting.
Indios are not considered subhuman everywhere despite your attempt to make it seem that way. "Indio" is NOT a "n" word little sister. Stop saying that.
I suppose it is perfectly alright if you are ignorant and insulting, as long as you mean well because you're a libtard or white?
Indio means Indian like african means black - the n* part is regional according to the status of the indios there.
Attachment 9442
There are a couple of important differences there. A Catholic priest who does what you describe actually is an ordained Catholic priest. This guy never was a Buddhist monk. He just dressed as one.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kellen Bassette
Not only that, in the Catholic church it's "once a priest always a priest". However a Buddhist monk who commits one of the four offences entailing defeat is no longer a Buddhist monk. Permanently. Regardless of whether he is ever found out or confesses.