Does this recent turn of events mean there will be no bloodshed? :(
Printable View
Does this recent turn of events mean there will be no bloodshed? :(
Oh geez, Hey MK , break out the long listQuote:
Originally posted by brothernumber9
what was one of the blanket statements that made you interperate otherwise?
Drun roll please.................
"what was one of the blanket statements that made you interperate otherwise?"
Generalizations of kung fu schools being tree huggers.
I know that In SC we go full contact, only wear headgear and and UFC gloves. No foot protectors, no chest guard... ect...
"Flan, you guys ever wonder what that yellow glaze is made of? Do you really want to know?"
Depends on where you get it. Some places caramelized sugar, some places fromunda cheese.
:eek:
"Does this recent turn of events mean there will be no bloodshed?"
Hope not. :(
thats only if they like you. If not its "special ingredient" time.
Hee hee
Its ok, I have a reputable flan dealer. I cant say his name tho... they might be watching...
*looks around wildly*
Let's start with this one....Quote:
Originally posted by SifuAbel
Oh geez, Hey MK , break out the long list
Drun roll please.................
Quote:
Originally posted by lkfmdc
The reality is quite simple, so called "traditional kung fu" people can't fight. They feel impotent, woefully incapable and worthless, thus they have to try and find excuses and cover their rear ends. Thus, when they look at REAL fighting, ie San Shou, they have to find ways to explain why they don't last 30 seconds....
a generalization is not a blanket statement. I don't doubt he may have typed something blanket like but i don't recall it. Probably most of what one might find as a blanket statement includes the words traditional followed by martial artist or master or sifu or whatever. My observation was that the word traditional was the one that was being misinterperated. I perceived he was using the word traditional in place of "masters who claim to teach traditional cma but never punched or got punched" kinda connotation. I could be wrong. I think the word traditional was the one being miscontextualized (I know miscontextualized is probably not a word but you know what I'm trying to say).
The reality is quite simple, so called "traditional kung fu" people can't fight. They feel impotent, woefully incapable and worthless, thus they have to try and find excuses and cover their rear ends. Thus, when they look at REAL fighting, ie San Shou, they have to find ways to explain why they don't last 30 seconds....
The problem is, that's pretty much a true statement.
WD,
Is your teacher a TMA?
Most kung fu people I have met are down to fight.
:confused:
Guess you northerners are just pansies.
:eek:
:D
My teacher posts here as MonkeySlap. Make your own decision.Quote:
Originally posted by MasterKiller
WD,
Is your teacher a TMA?
Smoking roaches. Some people think its gross.
Guys,
if you agree over the 'net to meet someone to fight them he might bring a 12-guage.
WD,
I know what my opinion is, I'm asking you for yours. I believe a traditional fighter can be effective...do you?
i think the name comes about because he'll slap you around like a monkey pretty much at will.
yes, WD's teacher is legit.
SD -- you mean northern kung-fuers, right? cause there's not a single tree-hugging hippie-wuss up here in washington state. nope. not a one.
;)