Search:

The title, subtitle and first sentence of the "article" are more than enough to cast it into
"the proper perspective". It's all twisted/slanted sh1t.

That's an Annenburg mouthpiece.
Annenburg is the bunch that was handing $$$ to Ayers and Obama to be doled out to their favorite leftie (even communist) buddies.

Republicans usually talk about doing that.... getting it done often depends on the Congress they inherit.




That's what normally happens with a tax cut.... unless they're not paying any prior...

otoh......

"The Media" is going to keep on doing that until after the election is over and Obama has "had his best shot" at "winning it".

"doublle entendre"?
"they say" that if you pound it hard/long/often enough they become doubly tender....... ?????
did Elvis do a song by that name?

Hmmmmm.... between this and your "easy score" guidelines, you seem well on your way to becoming a latter-day Tullius..... even if not much of a Marcus or Cicero.

Thanks, but I actually have not made any such "study".
"What you see is what you get." meaning that's just my off-the-cuff "take" on "all things marxist".
Those previously mentioned latter-day...

You posted a head-shot somewhere? :rolleyes:




In all of those cases, it was a bit more like "collaborate (do what we say) with us or die".... as regards "pretty much everything".... sounds...

{shrug}
I dunno.
I've already voted for one, although that was in a primary and he didn't get beyond that.
"Funny thing" is, at that time I was living in the city of Inglewood, Ca which is pretty...

Thanks for looking.... now learn to read.
That states that those are documented deaths.... many of which were not the result of allied actions.
Sic, suicide bombers and other "representatives" of...

Check your sources much?

http://www.iraqbodycount.org/

Publicly hanged/shot-to-pieces by his not-so-adoring public.




Looks to me like you're seeing what you want to see there.
The guy was a murdering piece of excrement for the "better part" of...

{snicker!}
It's gonna take one heckuva lotta "little disenfranchisements" to offset
20 EFFIN' MILLION MORE danged votes.




Could that be because any so-called "targeting" has roughly offset...

Are you sure that's not the number that files for and gets the "earned income tax credit"?
(aka "free money".... aka "refunds" of taxes they never paid in the first place)

You're gonna have to go some to prove that, since the numbers say that roughly 20% more folks voted in 2004 than in 2000.

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0781450.html

A lot of what you put forth is "true".

OTOH, a good deal of what the fellow thinks is endemic to the US population (decreasing height, etc) is actually from averaging the physical attributes of...

I think you prolly spellt dat wrong.... mebbe it s/b the "four *****s-men"?

Will wonders never cease?!
That is, without any doubt at all, the most balanced reportage I've ever seen from AP.

The end of the world must be nigh!

Looks like "all you guys" do your mental/philosophical shopping at "Non Sequiturs R Us"........

If something looks/acts/sounds/waddles like a duck......




I saw what you posted.

Bull Sh1t!
Your "pattern" was already becoming evident....
All of your posts conformed to that same pattern.
That was definitely "self-evident".

You're not the first to play that particular...

If you were posing "honest questions" that would be the case.
You've already admitted that you're just jerking 1bad's chain, and "Homey don't play dat!"

No.

Use Google and follow up on it yourself.
You've already "blown your cover", and I also happily award you the title of Master (de)Bater.

"Only the song remains the same..."

Just Google "Obama + ACORN".... those 725,000 references will still be there.