I only still interact with reductionists with conflicting views within themselves on this issue to find out just how far some of them will go and to know who to avoid talking to in the future.
Type: Posts; User: RonH
I only still interact with reductionists with conflicting views within themselves on this issue to find out just how far some of them will go and to know who to avoid talking to in the future.
With this thinking, ideas don't exist. Science has no place in the subject of qi. It has no place in the subject of meaning, philosophy. The best it can describe is the mechanism of a thing, but not...
There isn't one. The connect to electricity and biochemistry is that they show qi's exitence indirectly. The changes in them are because of a change in qi.
Let me ask you something, do you ever...
No, qi is qi. Qi is not energy detectable directly by the hard sciences' technology.