I've noticed when the topic of forms and fighting comes up, the argument against doing only forms is based on the fact that things are different against resisting opponents with elements like adrenaline/fear creeping into them.
However, I am of the opinion that, these elements aside, one still uses the same techniques/principles as in the forms, and the only difference between specific techniques from the forms and their use in fighting seems to be the emotional element, and forms should technically be performed under the correct emotional intent, as that should be considered part of the form.
So the questions are:
-Theoretically, could a person become a good fighter studying only the form, including angles of attack, footwork, emotional "centeredness"/"intensity", power generation, counters, etc.?
-If not, what prevents adequate simulation of the emotional content of a fight situation to do so?
I'm not looking for any set answer, just different member's views. Here's mine:
-Theoretically yes. Realistically, much, much more difficult.
-Difficult to test the emotions while doing forms, and how do you set up the proper mind frame? Carry poisonous snakes dangerously close to the forms practitioner, so that they must deal with the adrenaline and fear? Randomly poke a spear close to the practitioner without warning, just to try to freak them?(I like this concept. I suspect I'm gonna be one strange sifu)
Keep in mind, by saying "forms", I'm not just saying practicing the sets in their set order, but the pieces and different combinations of the pieces as the practitioner sees fit.