Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Peng, Lu, Ji, An vs. Float, Swallow, Spit, Sink?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    3,055
    Blog Entries
    1

    Peng, Lu, Ji, An vs. Float, Swallow, Spit, Sink?

    I had an interesting discussion with my Choy Lay Fut Sifu the other night over dinner. He said in any close contact Chinese martial art there are 4 energies, Float, Swallow, Spit and Sink. I thought about it and these sounded alot like Peng, Lu, Ji and An. The four energies of Taiji. He does Yang Taiji on the side and he said that these energies were basically the same thing. Anyone have any thoughts on this?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Akron, Ohio USA
    Posts
    920
    Fu Pow:

    Recently saw reference to a technique used in baji called swallow and spit. Done by Liu Yun Qiao in a fight (Pa Kua Journal written by Jason Tsou's student).
    "Its better to build bridges rather than dig holes but occasionally you have to dig a few holes to build the foundation of a strong bridge."

    "Traditional Northern Chinese Martial Arts are all Sons of the Same Mother," Liu Yun Qiao

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    468
    This came up on emptyflower forum a while back. Try visiting there, ask Ken Fish, he posts there regularly. My memory is that there are difference between the concepts you are comparing.
    The more one sweats in times of peace, the less one bleeds in times of war.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Vancouver, B.C. Canada
    Posts
    2,140

    Smile Internal Four Jing

    IMHO, Tun (Sallow) To ( Spit) Fou (Surface/Float) and Chum (Submerge/Skin) in Close quater arts (ie Bak Mei) are more linear and abrupt [snap off the root] While the Peng Lu Ji An in Taiji are more coiling and twirling [tear off the root]. It's like getting zapped by static charge with the TTFC while it's like getting bounce off a sphere surface or got caught in a whirl wind with P L J A. It's not a question of which is better but of stylistic differences.

    Mantis108
    Contraria Sunt Complementa

    對敵交手歌訣

    凡立勢不可站定。凡交手須是要走。千着萬着﹐走為上着﹐進為高着﹐閃賺騰挪為
    妙着。


    CCK TCPM in Yellowknife

    TJPM Forum

  5. #5
    Fu-pow, it's been a long time.

    Float, sink, swallow, and spit are common ideas with in TCMA, and are not incompatible with neijia principles. I have seen Li Tai-liang discuss using spit swallow to destroy your opponents bridge (I also had the opportunity to have him do this to me). That being said I've never heard these terms used in taiji, nor would I expect them to be (I'll explain shortly). Of course one could point to the results of an action a taiji practitioner took in for instance push hands and say that's swallowing, spiitting, floating or skinning, but from a taiji perspective none of these would be energies, they would rather be the outcomes of the standard energies. Why do I say this? Because, the essence of taiji training is that all techniques are abstracted. Thus, if we wanted to be extreme we could say there is only one technique in taiji-- peng ( as in neijin not peng, lu, ji an). Of course it would be impossible to learn taiji if we approached it with this level of abstration. So we break peng down further into different ways we can direct it. These are peng (ward-off usually used to describe an upward manifestation of jing) , lu (inward) , ji (outward) ,an (down). these energiescan be used individually or in combination to spit, swallow, floating, or sink our opponents, but they can be used for other effects as well. For instance it's very common to use an to break the bridge, and deliver a kau. I hope this explaination helped.

    --josh
    Last edited by josh_f; 10-18-2002 at 07:06 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •