Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 53

Thread: differences between 7*mantis and the other mantis styles

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Vancouver, B.C. Canada
    Posts
    2,140

    Smile

    Great thread and all round great input.

    First off, I found the assumption that masters don't befriend each other and exchange material quite unsettling. I think if we look closely we can see that a lot of masters learn form each other especially when they have equally quality material bring to the table. A lot of people went from other styles to learn Mantis. This doesn't mean that they will have to be brainwashed and forget about what they already achieved.

    Second, the following is my very own opinion. The information are collected through various sources. I am grateful to those who have opened my eyes, namely Ilya Profatilov, Kevin Bazier (Tainan Mantis) and many others. This doesn't represent any other's view except my very own. Any mistake is solely mind. Please feel free to correct me.

    I think a lot of the differences materialized because of the different methodolgies which are based in the teaching philosophies of the various masters. For example, the older version of TJPM based more on a body of techniques which are collectively known as Mishou (some seems to suggest that this is rather a form). This explain why it used to be very few students that the Grandmasters would accept and transmit the system to mainly an individual as oppose to many students. From there came Luanjie and Bazhou (during GM Liang XueXiang's time when he decided to accept a large number of students). Then came Xiao Beng Bu which was created to hide the Luanjie. Later another version of Beng Bu, which is the most recognizable PM form of all time, was created. Since it is taught in Yantai county, the old capital of Shandong, it is also called the Yantai Beng Bu. It's original name Da Beng Bu is now rarely in use. Finally a prototypical version of Dzai Yao was created. It is then further developed into 7 sections. At the core, the training philosophy is deeply rooted in Mishou where individual techniques are practiced mano a mano in most hardcore closed quater combat manner. This I have a taste of from my training in CCK TCPM which is a branch of TJPM. In a way, forms were created to keep other students entertained while the masters work closely with a selected number of students (1 or 2) in the Mishou type of training. If we look at the 12 Characters of Taiji (Meihwa), we see that they are somewhat of an encoded series of drills of conceptual nature, which are expressed through various combinations of techniques (ie Feng Shou has go-lu-tsai in it).

    Meanwhile no one exactly know what Li Sanjian taught but then by Wang Rongshang time Longfist forms would have been inseperable to the 7* system. From there Chaai Chui, HeHuJiaoJia and others were added. The main reason that there are so many forms and the high regard of form in 7* is IMHO mainly because of its Longfist background. Later on Ling forms became another important feature of 7*. If we examin the QingTsao 7*'s version of 12 characters we see the Longfist mindset is deeply encrouched (ie Beng, Pi, Tiao and Chong). It is also heavily technique based rather than concept based although some people argue that it is also concept based. But this somewhat hard style philosophy experienced yet another face lift by LGY's or WHF's time. Beng Da Diao Jun (swift and fluid - characteristic of Eagle Claw) replaced Beng Pi Tiao Chong (rapid and bold - that of longfist). This is largely IMHO a change due to coming in contact with Eagle Claw in Ching Wu, which was pioneering in creating a universial national art of China. The adaptation of these four words would make the gap between Eagle Claw and Mantis even smaller for Ching Wu students to learn things quickly, and switch from style to style without seemingly having 2 vastly different looking style. This would explain why HK 7* and mainland seems a bit different and instructors of Mantis origin of Ching Wu such as TJPM Grandmaster Chiu Chuk Kai adopted the latter deviced 12 characters. Drills in 7* are quite similar to Taiji's excepted often 7* drills are often broken down into smaller pieces and limit the student to one side of the drill as oppose to TJPM's switching role constantly.

    Kung Fu as martial education has to be pragmatic. It has to evolve according to the time and the need of the people. In the case of PM it has been so. Having said that we must remember those who make the evolution possible are well learned (martial wise) masters. They don't create or change things out of a whimp and pass it off as legitimate material. Until the time we all fully understood the profund wisdom that is in the system. I don't suggest anyone to make the system fits you. Rather you should first learn how to fit with the system. I agreed that way back when Tanglang is Tanglang and no specific tags were assigned. It would be great if we can do that again but currently it would take a major miracle to bring all sides to the table. Anyway, lineage dispute and secrets are major obstacles in promoting an awesome art such as Tanglangquan.

    Just my thoughts on the matter.

    Mantis108
    Contraria Sunt Complementa

    對敵交手歌訣

    凡立勢不可站定。凡交手須是要走。千着萬着﹐走為上着﹐進為高着﹐閃賺騰挪為
    妙着。


    CCK TCPM in Yellowknife

    TJPM Forum

  2. Ming Fai,

    Actually, from what I've heard, aren't they really one and the same style? Seven Star Praying Mantis supplemented with the forms Meihua Lu, Meihua Shou and Meihua Quan = Meihua Tanglang.
    Short answer is no they are not one and the same.

    mantis_seeker

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Tainan Taiwan
    Posts
    1,864
    Mighty B,
    The forms listed in my version of the Hseng Hsiao manuscript.

    -Short Strikes 9981 Changes
    That means it has 9 keywords and 9 methods for 81 changes

    -Mantis does 6 roads

    -Mantis fist Fanche does 4 roads

    -9 turns and 18 falls in 20 roads

    -Bone Breaks in 8 roads

    -20 methods for groin kicks(not a form)

    The manuscript describes PM as being a type of short strikes, not short strikes the popular form which has no relation to PM.

    Ming Fai,
    You are right that some PM teachers only called their PM as Mantis with out saying what type

    Mantis108,
    Why do you think bengbu came to hide Luanjie?

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Tainan Taiwan
    Posts
    1,864

    Oops, I goofed!

    I miss quoted Liang Hsuehsiang's manuscript about what forms it mentions.
    The following quote is from Ilya Profatilov.

    "...Liang Xuexiang's original manuscript(1852), Wang Lang created such forms as:
    1. Bazhou
    2. Luanjie
    3. Mishou(later calledZhaiyao)

    Note: and there is no Bengbu!!!

    Which means that these are the forms that Li Bingxiao learned from Nameless Outlaw. It means that Nameless Outlaw referred to Bazhou, Luanjie and Mishou(later called Zhaiyao) as being Wang Lang's creation.
    It also means that these forms go as far back as pre Nameless Outlaw's period(1600's).

    Bengbu is not mentioned.

    Bengbu appears at the end of another manuscript by Liang Xuexiang, but it is not mentioned as Wang Lang's form.

    Who created Bengbu?

    Possibly any of the following masters:
    -Nameless Outlaw
    -Li Bingxiao
    -Zhao Zhu
    -and even Liang Xuexiang himself.

    It is a mystery yet to be solved..
    But at least we know for sure that the oldest forms are Bazhou, Luanjie and Mishou(later called Zhaiyao)."

  5. #20
    How do the three essentials fit in?

  6. #21

    so...

    will we see a school return to teaching WL's three forms as the first three forms in the system?

  7. #22

    Carly...

    No,

    They are too advanced.

    Praying Mantis wasn't intended to be an entry-level martial art. That's why Lo Kwang Yu invented Sub Sa Lo for the Chin Wu. PM didn't have any basic forms to teach beginners.

  8. #23

    didn't chin wu beginners

    already have a LOT of forms before they got to study mantis?
    The last thing they needed was one more.

  9. #24
    Sub Sa Lo exists, so that should answer your question.

  10. #25

    Smile yes

    What do sifus do to avoid teaching applicatiosn and sparring?
    They teach another form!

  11. #26

    hmmmmmm

    TAINAN MANTIS....

    What makes you think that Wang Rong Sheng added "Whipe Ape Steals the Peach" or "Mantis Steals the Peach? You referred to "Mantis Steals the Peach for HK 7* as if HK 7* does not contain the set "Whipe Ape steals the Peach" in their cirriculum???

    MIGHTY B...

    "I do agree that there is little pure praying mantis.."

    Well i think we all would agree, mantis has evolved as it should if it is going to be effective on the streets, hand to hand. Things thta stay the same in any arena without change or evolving eventually become extinct.

    So i dont know if pure with reference to mantis in this way is a good thing or bad thing in the way it was referenced.

    Hong Kong Mantis practictioners were taught and still teach CH forms, but they are told that they are CH forms and are not told that they are mantis so it in no way WATERS down HK 7* mantis or make it less pure. They are used as a foundation to build basics and give the student a foundation.
    "The key is to begin at the beginning;high level short cuts can only lead to dead end."

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas, USA
    Posts
    669

    Re: didn't chin wu beginners

    Originally posted by carly
    already have a LOT of forms before they got to study mantis?
    The last thing they needed was one more.
    Mantis was a system to learn after you have years of other CMA's under your belt.....an add-on to what already existed.
    That is the way many arts emerge, which is why we have a listing of where the techniques of mantis came from.....Someone had to know how to use them before they could combine them into a system, ...Yes?
    Anyway,..back to history!
    (This has been a great dicussion BTW!)
    Best Wishes,
    ~BTL
    How many identities does a Troll need?
    Didn't think I knew did you??
    I know a lot of things.
    You won't like me in person either.
    Confused?? Don't be.
    LOL!

  13. #28

    well it's a fascinating discovery

    that sifu Profatilov has made.

  14. #29
    Kicking Mantis,

    What are CH forms?

    --

    What I meant by pure mantis is that there aren't a lot of forms (beginner through intermediate) that Sifu would say are just mantis. It's all mantis in the advanced though. I think this is more of a Chin Wu thing and doesn't mean that HK 7* is less mantis or anything. Heck, I don't know much about other styles of mantis, I just enjoy what I study.

  15. #30
    And,

    Not only does HK 7* have "White ape steals the Peach", it also has "White ape exits the Cave". Two fun and fine forms in my opinion.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •