I wonder what you are suggesting now.
"Ah, yes. My previous post does seem to contain an unintentional tint of ambiguous bias. I do fully believe in most of the teachings from the East, for I have no reason to doubt it. Unless, of course I took a purely (modern) scientific approach."
I realize teachings from the East do fascinate you,they used to fascinate me too.
Iīm a bit concerned when you say that you fully believe most of the teachings from the East (East-not being defined very well)
Trying to develop a decent picture of "teachings from the East" in my Western brain,I believe I can safely say that a teaching or two from that very direction can be of use,and also that they can also be of little use (now it depends where youīre taking something to.I posit that to rationally examine certain "teachings" does not necessarily embrace them)
"Though, science seems to be beneficial in the long run, I am all too aware of its greatest flaw... the scientists. They hold true to one vision of the mechanics of the universe, and only change minutely. Any drastic change in the view of the universe, or inventions that fully destroy the logic behind conventional theory will be ridiculed, and ultimately suppressed."
It seems to me you are not among the science camp then.
Of course I would be delighted to see your evidence for this and also how this relates.
If this is supposed to relate to the fraud that we discussed earlier,Iīm afraid you may have to reconstruct your definition of science.
The sunsetīs setting down.Lay me on the forest floor.
______________________________
I do not necessarily stand behind all of the statements I have made in the past, in this forum. Some of the statements may have appeared to support a biased view of reality, and may have been offensive. If you are a moral person and were hurt by comments that I made, you can PM me about it and I will apologize if I find your cause reasonable.
-FC, summer of 2006-