Originally posted by reneritchie
One of the things I like most about HFY is the detailed level of analysis and rigorous testing (challenges) they put everything through (I actually do like HFY, its some of the posters I have problems with).
IMHO, respectful questions are merely the same type of analysis and rigorous testing (challenges). I put everything I come across through this process. I think we all do to one degree or another.
I'd like to hear the methodology of analysis and testing from HFY or any other lineage. IMO, Wing Chun is derived from analysis of everything that has become a component of the system and the discarding of excess or less effective means from the system.
Too bad no public records exist of how the ancestors figured it all out. That would be a good read.
John Weiland
"Et si fellitur de genu pugnat"
(And if he falls, he fights on his knees)
---Motto of the Roman Legionary
"Aim at Heaven and you will get earth 'thrown in': aim at earth
and you will get neither." --C. S. Lewis