Originally posted by shaolinarab
the article on authenticity is indeed interesting and useful for a beginning student, but it is not right in my opinion to speak in such absolutist terms, as it comes off arrogant, misleading, and even incorrect at times. just three cases in point. we've belabored the issues of either sais, nunchukus, or even colored sashes being used in CMA schools (especially the rank sashes), and the author is presumptuous to automatically dismiss any school that does any of those things.
I don't think he's saying, "Any one of these things means that the school is not CMA and should be burned to the ground." He's setting guidelines for identifying characteristics that should warn people that a school is not what it claims to be. Additionally, to compete with the booming popularity of non-CMA schools, some CMA schools are starting to adopt things like rank sashes or uniforms (not do-gi style ones). On the other hand, if a supposed CMA school flags several of these warning signs, some further questioning might be in order.
Cut the tiny testicles off of both of these rich, out-of-touch sumbiches, crush kill and destroy the Electoral College, wipe clean from the Earth the stain of our corrupt politicians, and elect me as the new president. --Vash