I would just like to bring this up in light of the many recent posts regarding mma wing chun and several others. What I think we have all noticed is that there are several warring schools of thought in each of the threads and they usually involve the same people. Its easy to see both points of view. I have tried to bring this up before with little success (due to my own lack of skill in explaining myself). Im hoping I may do a better job this time around. The meat of what I want to say is:
ALL WING CHUN WAS NOT BORN EQUAL
This is a sensitive issue with people but it need not be. Ive noticed on many of these posts that people stay well clear of bringing differences up which is admirable. But lets face it there are huge difference in the way we train and what we are trying to accomplish from our training.
This doesnft mean: CERTAIN WING CHUN SCHOOLS ARE INFERIOR OR SUPPERIOR TO OTHERS.
But lets not avoid the issue that there are definitely huge differences.
Internal verses external debates always end up frustrating people and such debates often end up with the tune of gthere is no such thing as internal and externalh. OK thatfs fine. But can we at least say that certain schools have an internal focus and others an external? There is definitely a huge difference here and it comes down to what people are aiming for in the first place. To give people some perspective lets give 2 extreme example of fighting arts: Tai Chi and Kick boxing. Both have the potential to produce excellent fighters with terrific skills. However, both have different learning curves and both have different goals in mind.
I think it is important to respect what each others motives and goals are, and realise that whatever they are we will achieve them on the current path we are on.
Different w.c schools/lineages have a different flavour. Having participated in another W.C school and having seen many wing chun schools I have come to the opinion that almost every wing chun school has something that other Wing Chun schools do not have. Some Wing Chun schools are more concerned with exact positioning of limbs for techniques and high physical fitness to express their techniques. Other schools are not concerned so much with this hand positioning and speed but the intent and mind focus behind it. I currently subscribe to the second but I realise there are draw backs to it. One of which, being the lack of emphasis on physical fitness.
However, its important that we respect each others motives. Looking at the William Cheung camp on this forum, videos, and online clips of him (for example), you can see that the focus is on a very physical expression of Wing Chun. Look at Chu Shong Tins and it is not so physical but very powerful.
All Im saying is that I think the core of our disputes are caused by what we think wing chun should be. When in reality, wing chun has so many different interpretations that we are often comparing apples to oranges.
What do you think?
What are your personal motivations for doing W.C?
What does your interpretation of Wing Chun mean for you?