Kung Fu and the UFC, which is more reality based?

[reemul]

missed your point.

[unkokusai]

Originally posted by reemul
missed your point.

I'm not surprised.

[SevenStar]

Originally posted by reemul
Doesn't really matter, I've done it and It works. Though it may be to your dismay, It is a fight stopper.


positional dominance? sure it matters.

[unkokusai]

Originally posted by SevenStar
Originally posted by reemul
Doesn't really matter, I've done it and It works. Though it may be to your dismay, It is a fight stopper.


positional dominance? sure it matters.

I think he's talking about the thing he has never used in a fight, or practiced, or seen. But he's sure its a fight ender. And who could argue with that?

[reemul]

I'm not surprised.

Well say what you mean instead dancing around the subject.

positional dominance? sure it matters.

I agree, my point is that against MMA practioners I have managed to execute the technique among others and have been successful.

I think he's talking about the thing he has never used in a fight, or practiced, or seen. But he's sure its a fight ender. And who could argue with that?

And you make this assumption based on what exactly?

[unkokusai]

Originally posted by reemul
Well say what you mean instead dancing around the subject.

I agree, my point is that against MMA practioners I have managed to execute the technique among others and have been successful.

And you make this assumption based on what exactly?

How many windpipes have you torn out again?

How many eyes?

Ripped the flesh off your victim's face?

How often has this happened?


BTW, I'm glad that you can enjoy playing around with your little buddies, but you don't have to mention them in your answer. UNLESS YOU'VE KILLED THEM!

[unkokusai]

Originally posted by reemul


And you make this assumption based on what exactly?

Uh, you told me.

[reemul]

Personally I think it just burns you up to think a TCMA could get the better of a MMA practioner.

How many windpipes have you torn out again?

none, but I have applied the technique to the point that my opponent immediately gave up. They are not all my friends by the way. Either way my friends are not punks unwilling to commit to full contact. You again are making a judgement call on something you know nothing about.

Here is an experiment for you:
Forget about posistion defense and all that for a moment. Have a willing participant touch his fingers to his thumb behind your windpipe. Then come back and explain to me how you would get out of it before haveing your windpipe crushed.

[unkokusai]

Originally posted by reemul
Personally I think it just burns you up to think a TCMA could get the better of a MMA practioner.

Why would that burn me up? I'd like to see it actually.

[unkokusai]

Originally posted by reemul


none.

Right.

[unkokusai]

Originally posted by reemul
They are not all my friends by the way.

LOL

I like it when you change the story to make it sound more legit.

[unkokusai]

Originally posted by reemul

Here is an experiment for you:...

Here we go again. Let's imagine this, and let's imagine that. Now let me do this, and now I'll let you do that...

No wonder it seems to 'work' so well for you in your controlled environment with your trusted friends.

This just keeps gettin' more impressive all the time!

[reemul]

... you make sweeping statements across a wide variety of MA based on limited exposure or what you see on pay-per view.

Also like the way you use this limited exposure to make weak arguments for your case and take things out of context and attempt to make issues of the most unimportant aspects of statements.

[reemul]

I said do it.

Don't twist words.

Well, application is all you believe in, and you don't wish to believe my experience so I'm providing you with a way to experience it on your own. Nothing to be scared of.

[unkokusai]

Originally posted by reemul
... you make sweeping statements across a wide variety of MA based on limited exposure or what you see on pay-per view.

Also like the way you use this limited exposure to make weak arguments for your case and take things out of context and attempt to make issues of the most unimportant aspects of statements.

"limited exposure" ?