Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: 18 Hands of Lohan

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    187

    18 Hands of Lohan

    Has anyone seen a video (on the Internet) of this form being done? Would someone who knows the form mind filming themselves and uploading? Im really curious about the differences between styles, since a lot of CMA say they have this form.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canada!
    Posts
    23,110
    lohan, 18 hands, etc etc... all generic to buddhist kungfu.

    in some cases it is delivered and practiced as qigongs. In others it is done more like a martial art form...

    No one has any original material and so to fill the void for the masses, people revive these things and attach these names to them.

    THis is not to say it's bad, just to say that you will not find 2 the same in two different schools.

    All the arhat boxig and lohan performance as sets or chi kungs are different.

    The similarities will only be evident where one has learned from another, or has co-opted from another, but the original stuff just no longer exists.

    That's how kungfu is.
    Kung Fu is good for you.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    187
    The reason im asking this, is because my style also has an "18 Hands" form. My instructor once visited a school of another style, and they also had an "18 Hands". They both performed, and were both shocked at how similar they were. I was wondering if anyone else could show me theirs/other styles version, just so I could compare.

    Its just me being curious :P

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canada!
    Posts
    23,110
    1.http://www.wahnam.com/ChiKung/18lohanhands.htm

    2.http://www.tai-chi-centre.com/lohan.htm

    3.http://hometown.aol.co.uk/choylifutuk/18lohanform.html

    4.http://www.khandro.net/deities_arhats.htm

    5.http://images.google.ca/images?hl=en...hands+pictures

    and so on...

    each is different, but they are all named the same.

    the qigongs will have similarity. But as a form, I don't think there is a total concensus across all schools as to what the original shape was.

    There's also a ton of information on where they came from, of course the bodhidharma story is in there, and even some about the actual 18 lohans, etc etc.
    Kung Fu is good for you.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    187
    Thanks.

    I didnt read through all of them, yet. Thats a lot of info!

    All of those were on the QiGong Lohan set, though. What about the sets that were made for pure martial purposes? Are there any? Thats mainly what I was looking for, but the links sparked up some questions to ask my Sifu.

    Thanks again.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Sub. of Chicago - Downers Grove
    Posts
    6,772
    Mine looks like number 3 the most. I go it off a video from Temple Knights productions.

    http://www.martialartsmart.net/pr-tp004.html
    Those that are the most sucessful are also the biggest failures. The difference between them and the rest of the failures is they keep getting up over and over again, until they finally succeed.


    For the Women:

    + = & a

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canada!
    Posts
    23,110
    temple knights has videos?

    those guys are here in Toronto.

    unless of course, it is a different temple knights.
    Kung Fu is good for you.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    36th Chamber
    Posts
    12,423
    What about this one by Shi De Yang?

    http://us.yesasia.com/en/PrdDept.asp...c/version-all/
    He most honors my style who learns under it to destroy the teacher. -- Walt Whitman

    Quote Originally Posted by David Jamieson View Post
    As a mod, I don't have to explain myself to you.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •