You've been quiet for a bit. Good to see you back dispensing the moderation.In a nutshell....According to our lineage, our forms came from one resident of the Fujian temple that learned several systems and became the martial head of the temple. ("Su Kong Tai Djian) These forms don't seem to be the standard forms traditionally taught at the songshan temple now. But (and reading this thread would find some answers and many more questions) that lineage is not verified by any other outside source so take it for whatever you want.
What is "verified" is that two Chinese men from Indonesia learned a system of martial arts and taught it to some Americans in Lexington Kentucky. At some point that system was called shaolin do. According to those gentlemen their teacher (Ie Chang Ming) learned from Su Kong. There were also other "colleagues" that specialized in other systems (such as the 8 drunken immortals and the Tai Pang systems). They learned from Ie and these other teachers. There have been some individuals outside of SD that reference Ie Chang Ming and some of the colleagues, but nothing very solid.
In total, it is a patchwork type system that teaches forms from multiple styles. Some of the students are very good and some are not (like many styles). The material has depth and applicability, but that is not always emphasized (again depending on the teacher).
If you want more detail, read this thread. I was just trying to "hit the high points" in this post. For all I know, you just want to stir up the debate again, but I'm a bit bored this afternoon, so I'll bite.
r,
ON