Is Shaolin-Do for real?

[TrollTerminator]

Seppuku....I do not dislike or even hate African Americans. You have bad white people and you have bad black people. Heck, you have bad people in all races and color. Its people like you (because I saw it in one of your posts) that make me upset. When you accused someone of being racist because he asked someone who "supposedly" had a m.a. school in oakland how many students were African American. He's racist because he asked that? Give me a break! Get over it buddy. And no I'm not racist or prejudiced towards any race of people. For your info I have a lot of African American friends. Now, are you going to say I'm racist because I have black friends and thats my way of showing I'm not racist but I really am? I predict thats what you'll say next. Get a life Seppuku. Also I'm not prejudiced against religions, sexual orientation, etc..... I'm very open minded (well maybe a little prejudiced against Democrats.......lol. Just joking).

Originally Posted by mkriii
You are obviously an African-American thats trying to show that he has a little bit of education but in reality has none. I was just going along with your B.S. conversation to amuse you. Your attack on NJM's comments in earlier posts shows that you are an idiot. There is a saying........ You can take the ******* out of the ghetto but you can't take the ghetto out of the ********.

How else would you take this statement
TT

[kungfujunky]

i took them as racist and ignorant....of course i already knew mkriiii was ignorant so that wasnt a surprise.

im surprised he is allowed to stay on this forum with his personal attacks and now racial slurs.

he is a troll who adds nothing of import to any thread i have seen him post in.


then there is the link he posted for a made up shaolin ninjitsu site that had a ton of inappropriate material in it.

mkriii.....you are a coward plain and simple. and if that offends you then great. maybe that will get you out of your closet and actually cross hands with someone.

as of right now i have zero regard for you or for what you say. you present yourself poorly and show little respect for others. a martial artist with YOUR amount of training and skill should know better.

[humbleman]

...the realm of the truly stupid and obscenely ignorant. Isn't there a monitor who's supposed to keep idiots like this off of here? pping probably wouldn't cure you. Life would have to do that. Maybe you were raised by idiots. Maybe you were dropped on your head as a baby. More likely you're just an ass.this is in reference to mkriiis idiotic childish remarks.

[kwaichang]

mkriii well still waiting and BTW why would you say African Americans and not refer to ohers as Scotish Irish Amrican or othrwise drop the African American crap and be AMERICAN as that is what you are or arent KC

[humbleman]

is in reference to mkriiis' sick crap that has no place here.

[Shaolin Wookie]

Originally Posted by mkriii
You are obviously an African-American thats trying to show that he has a little bit of education but in reality has none. I was just going along with your B.S. conversation to amuse you. Your attack on NJM's comments in earlier posts shows that you are an idiot. There is a saying........ You can take the ******* out of the ghetto but you can't take the ghetto out of the ********.

How else would you take this statement
TT

So, what exactly was in the place of the 7 & 8 letter ********? Do you throw that around with your African American friends?

[arinathos.valin]

If Mussolini was a socialist, why was his party the National Fascist Party?

[Golden Tiger]

Quote:
Originally Posted by tattooedmonk View Post
or 3.

Is the lower level staff/ bo form ,Su Ba kuen, that is taught by the CSCs the same form as what is listed as Chu Chi Kuen Su from the old list (The one in GMS's hand writing, both in Chinese and English)of material taught up to 5th black??

I have the blue belt form listed as Chu Chi Kuen Su on every material list I have

This list also shows forms that were taught @ 3rd and 2nd that are now requirements for 1st. I have an understanding that it was changed to allow for additional material to be added, but ,when do you think this changed?


Not sure what you are refering to, could you be a bit more specific?

I also noticed that Pan Loong Pang is not listed in the material @ all .
Do you know when this was added??

I have it listed in all the material lists circa late 80's early 90's. Seems like I learned it at about that same time

I thought it was originally taught at 3rd? Is this correct??

Yes, it has always (as far as I know) been 3rd to 4th material

I also noticed that many of the form names for staff/bo (s) are refered to as "Pang", this means monks staff/ stick ,right? Would this not also add to the credibility of SD coming from the temples? Or just part of the big lie that the criminal matermind ,GMS, is propetuating?

[Leto]

Quote:
Originally Posted by tattooedmonk View Post
or 3.
This list also shows forms that were taught @ 3rd and 2nd that are now requirements for 1st. I have an understanding that it was changed to allow for additional material to be added, but ,when do you think this changed?


Not sure what you are refering to, could you be a bit more specific?

I think the black belt level curriculum is a bit different in the west than it is in the east. At least from the websites I've seen,

On the document, it shows all four spears as first black material. In the west, while we learned all four at first black, only Chiang Su Lian Si and Lo Chia Chiang were on the test to 2nd. The other two aren't tested until 3rd-4th. The double broadsword and tiger hooks are listed as 3rd to 4th, in the west they are on the
1st to 2nd test. Just a little switch around.
Also, tai chi sword is listed on 2nd to 3rd, in the west it wasn't tested until
5th to 6th. We had skewer the sun sword on the test from 2nd to 3rd, which isn't on the document at all.
Obviously, this was a relatively early document. Since a lot of material has been added to the curriculum since then I'm not surprised that the order changed around some. Also, I know that the testing order in the east is different than that in the west, and the east has some forms that the west doesn't.
Even at brown belt levels, things are done differently in the east and west. In the east, I believe there's a set order for learning and testing over the forms at each brown belt level, like in the document. In the west, all fifteen forms are taught on a rotating scheduling over the course of a year, and each test you perform the ones you have learned so far, until your black belt test where you know/perform all of them. So a new third brown might learn Guan kung dao first, if he advanced in august. Someone who started brown belt in november would learn lian wu chang first.

[Shaolin Wookie]

Socialism of all types (fascism/communism/socialism)is derived from the same sources, Neitzsche, Mark, Hedeigger, etc.

What the ****?!!!???Nietzsche detested communism like he detested Christinanity.

Anything that smacked of the higher ideal over personal struggles--it was "decadent" to him. Besides which, he wasn't that fond of "culturing the masses"--if anything, he was the strongest opponent of socialism. How the are you lumping Heidegger in there, as well?

Such misinformation!

Here's who's responsible for communism/socialism/facism......Marx! LOL.....(BTW...if you were siginifying the Apostle Mark in your original post, you might be right....LOL...)

[Mas Judt]

You are missing the point. What Neitzche thought is irrelevant. What people who were inspired by him is what I am discussing.

I find the veil of intellectual dishonesty is strong on this little bit of history. The SovietAgitProp did a good job on our universities, and our schools seem more concerned with 'identity politics' (a remnant of fascism) than actual history...

[Shaolin Wookie]

In other words: let's tradduce writers on the basis of some Bolshevik hicks who didn't have the wit to comprehend, or hijacked their premises out of context?

It's the reason ignorant ****ers still link Nietzsche to Hitler. Hitler posthumously hijacks a Nietzschean phrase or two, ignores all else, and people think Nietzsche is prescribing a Nazi regimen because Hitler knew a phrase or two, and naught else. So, let's ignore everything Nietzsche ever said (none of which prescribes a facist ideal and all of which shirks conformity and uniformity in every facet of life) because Hitler quoted a phrase?

That makes no sense, whatsoever. The socialist paradigm was spread by writers like HG Wells, Marx, and some other French dudes (whose names I forget); it was a historical phenomenon that reacted to the Industrial Revolution and Marxism.

I don't know what Nietzsche or Heidegger have to do with that. They were, primarily, psychological philosophers, not political ones. They were more like Freud, and less like Marx. Ah, but that's right, I've been brainwashed by the Soviet propaganda structured into American Universities?......LOL.......

[tattooedmonk]

where did they come from?

[kwaichang]

Shaolin KC

[tattooedmonk]

Shaolin KC

LMAO
. which temple??