I'll second Shen Ku
I've seen on this thread talk about repeating unverified second hand stories as truth, and critiquing the credibility of comments and tales from hundreds of years ago, and the practices of historians and the validity of their theories, and benefits of accurate archaeology. The so-called photos of GM Su Kong, or that circus guy, were promoted as "proof" of something, although I don't think it proved anything.
Several once used the absence of photo evidence of GM Ie as proof of something as well.
But here are other actual photos -- history itself -- that some of you are fortunate enough to be able to speak of, and see, and tease the rest of us that are truly interested in, and interested in that history, but not fortunate enough to have the photos.
Such photos are our closest connection to that past that we want to be a small part of. Just seeing the cropped ones, and hearing the talk of them, is educational.
It is truly none of our business who don't have the photos, unless someone else invites us to see them, and no one could legitimately fault anyone who has them to keep them to themselves. But I would second Shen Ku's request for posting what you are speaking to each other about.
Just One Student
"I seek, not to know all the answers, but to understand the questions." --- Kwai Chang Caine
(I'd really like to know all the answers, too, but understanding the questions, like most of my martial arts practice, is a more realistically attainable goal)