Results 1 to 15 of 35

Thread: UNESCO and the politics of culture

Threaded View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Calgary, Canada
    Posts
    520

    UNESCO and the politics of culture

    After a high-profile PR campaign by Shi Yongxin to have Shaolin Kung Fu be
    put on UNESCO's intangible heritage list the PRC has decided to hold off.
    My guess is that the trademark issue has hit a few nerves and could potentionally create some negative waves internationally for the PRC.

    http://english.sina.com/china/1/2005/0428/29336.html

    What does "safeguarding" intangible cultural heritage mean?
    Although there are many good intentions with this initiative, when you boil it down and get below the platitudes and motherhood statements, it is about political control of culture. This so called "safeguarding" is simply a tool for international legal control of culture by governments. You can be sure that the PRC will identify and define the various elements of "Shaolin kung-fu." This has to do with the adoption of legal measures aimed at groups that PRC/Shi Yongxin feels undermines his objectives in both national and international arenas. Consider the following which appeared in the Sun Shangwu (China Daily).

    "He (Shi Yongxin) says more effort from the government is needed to put Shaolin kung fu on the UNESCO list.

    He (Shi Yongxin) has submitted a proposal to the NPC session, asking the country's top legislature to consider a special law to protect (Shaolin Kungfu) ... ."

    "Controversially, he also established a company (Henan Shaolin Temple Industrial Development Ltd. Co.) to protect intellectual property rights and prevent the abuse of the name Shaolin by companies seeking easy profits."

    "Unsurprisingly, Shi (Shi Yongxin), . . .will not rest even if he gets UNESCO status or is handed a national culture-protection law."

    He says he is willing to walk the earth to promote, (read this as, getting control of) Shaolin kung fu."

    This is not about the use of the word 'Shaolin'for selling sausages etc. but rather about using the word "Shaolin" in reference to martial arts training. In the USA, as in most other countries in the world, the word "Shaolin" has already been trademarked for all products and services by Shi Yongxin. What he has not trademarked in the US, and Canada for that matter, is the exclusive use of Shaolin in relationship to martial arts training. I suspect the UNESCO list was to be the lever with which he planned to accomplish that. In Europe the trademark already includes martial arts training, but I believe this aspect of the Shaolin trademark in Europe can be still challenged successfully.

    r.
    Last edited by r.(shaolin); 05-01-2005 at 08:38 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •