Originally Posted by
Jimbo
I never, ever expected any movie about Bruce Lee's life to attempt to recreate any incidences as accurately as possible. It will never happen. The image of BL the man is too tied up with the image of BL the cinematic fighter/superhero. No filmmaker will go for any degree of accuracy, because the truth is always much more mundane than fantasy, especially regarding BL.
The funny thing is, the way Wong Jack Man is being presented here, and the way I've seen him (or implied representations of him) in other movies, is even further from reality than the way BL himself has been represented. In Dragon: The Bruce Lee Story, the long-haired Hung Gar fighter (played by former HK kung fu star John Cheung) was not named WJM, who is mentioned once as another teacher, but is clearly meant to represent him. In Bruce Lee: The Man, the Myth, WJM is represented by an old street hood/bully. And now, WJM is a Shaolin monk(?). I don't know how many Shaolin monks were tromping around San Francisco in 1964; my guess is zero. The really bizarre thing is, these are wildly inaccurate representations of a man who is still very much alive today!!
The movie itself looks like it's definitely worth a watch. I like Philip Ng, and am glad he's gotten this opportunity. What puzzles me from the trailer is the need for the white character. This isn't a racist observation but a sincere one. Apparently, the Hollywood producers and writers did not think that a movie featuring an Asian protagonist and antagonist would hack it without it all revolving around a white leading(?) character who seems to drive the story, and also appears to be the only one who gets the (predictably Asian) girl. At least that's the impression I get from the trailer.