Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18

Thread: New Weapons

  1. #1
    Sam Wiley Guest

    New Weapons

    I was wondering what the board's opinion was on creating new weapons for our arts. I mean, what would you think if someone designed a totally new weapon, the techniques to go with it, the training methods and drills, and the forms, too? Would it be presumptuous to do so, or is it about time for something a little different to come along? Would any of you be interested in learning a weapon invented in modern times for your chosen art? Do you think the person who invented the thing would take a lot of crap from people, or would his enginuity be well received?

    *********
    "I put forth my power and he was broken.
    I withdrew my power and he was ground into fine dust."

    -Aleister Crowley, The Vision and the Voice

  2. #2
    Prairie Guest
    Creating a truly new weapon would be exceedingly difficult. The designs would almost certainly have been developed in the past at some point. Even if the design was totally unique, there will be a problem finding opportunities to test it to find how to use it. One is unlikely to go to war with a hand weapon ... unless it's fueled by gunpowder.

    I'd love to see a new weapon come into martial arts. However, I think it's more likely that some styles could adopt weapons from other styles. For example, I don't believe the whip chain is practiced in taijiquan. Perhaps it could be adopted with appropriate techniques that conform to the styles principles.

    Bye for Now

  3. #3
    Guest
    I made a funny little club. I got a carbon-fiber rod about four foot long with threaded ends from Home Depot (i think it was supposed to be for tents). Then screwed on some lead pipe fittings to one end (quarter pound worth). Took rope and wrapped the length of it so it had more of a grip (used duct tape and twine/wood glue to bind the rope). The carbon shaft makes it flexible and durable. When you hit a tree with it, it doesn't bounce off, it just sinks in.

  4. #4
    PlasticSquirrel Guest

    hmm....

    this would prove to be difficult, but entirely possible. if it was me, this is what i'd do:

    1. get a video teaching the form of a weapon with a similar focus as your own (kwong wing lam has made a multitude of shaolin weapon forms videos). the moves will give you innovative, practical, and strategic movements.

    2. add the principles of the style that you will adapt it to, blend them, and edit, discard, and add movements to it.

    3. hone your skills for quite a long time, making sure that your movements can defend at anything anyone throws at you, and attack to normal areas (i know you do taiji, so one logical thing to do would be to incorporate some of the point striking that your taiji uses).

    4. organize your movements into a form that you can practice that encompasses all of your movements.

    5. make two-person forms for the weapon.

    again, this is just what i would do. make sure that the weapon you make complies with the principles of your style, though.

    good luck, sam. it will be interesting, i'm sure. :)

  5. #5
    TaoBoxer Guest

    Innovation

    I think the idea here is to modernize or adapt a classical tool to the 21st century, like the Carbon Fiber rod mentioned above. Is that really anything more than a Japanese jo? an Indian lathi? The phillipino's use light and fast whip-like sticks also.

    I can think of 2 examples of this kind of innovation.... First is the Manrikki-garrote made by James Piorek of Bladerigger. (www.bladerigger.com) I have had mine for 2 years and I can't say enough abt it.

    Second would be Bram Frank's Gunting, which is an innovative folding knife. While I haven't used one personally, I have heard many reports about it's great effeciency.

  6. #6
    Ky-Fi Guest
    Sam, with the incredible number of weird weapons devised by the Chinese, I'd be surprised if anyone could come up with something TOO unique, but hey, if you can come up with some new weapon, base it on the Yang style, and go into as much depth as you do some of your posts here---I'll at least buy the book. :)

    Prarie, you know I've thought of that too--I always thought the chain whip would really apply well to Taiji principles, especially with the fajing---I'm surprised no one (that I know of) has added that to Taiji,

  7. #7
    Sam Wiley Guest
    Well, the weapon I have in mind is not totally unique, as it has elements of other weapon in it, but I have never had one exactly like it at all. There are other weapons that are similar, and I imagine that whatever I come up with will be similar to what has already been invented.

    Anyway, I have already received feedback from friends who build homemade weapons about structural stability, have made a few changes from my original design, and plan to take the design to a local company that may be able to custom forge a set of them for me once I have worked out all the little flaws and have developed some training methods for them.

    I understand that in modern society there is really no point in learning exotic and outdated weapons, and these are not weapons you could easily conceal, nor would they really help one out against a gun or something like that. However, I have found that an understanding of the weapons of a style helps to understand the rest better, especially when it comes to each style's particular way of moving. While there may be no real reason to learn yet another weapon you'd never carry anyway, I believe that for the sake of the art part of the martial arts every now and again we must have something new.

    Anyway, these are just some things I have been thinking about, and I was curious as to people's opinions of modern innovations in the martial arts. It's nice to know that at least a few will be open to the idea. And it's great to get some constructive suggestions on it. Thanx guys. :)

    *********
    "I put forth my power and he was broken.
    I withdrew my power and he was ground into fine dust."

    -Aleister Crowley, The Vision and the Voice

  8. #8
    Braden Guest
    You know what I would kill for?

    Imagine full length leather forearm bracers, with maybe some reinforcements along the upper forearm. Along the the underside is attached a sort of very-flattened, thin metal pipe that runs the full length of the bracer. By some mechanism, you can pull the metal pipe forward a couple inches so that you can just grip the end of it in the palm of your hand. Thing is, the whole pipe is a giant switch blade.

    Ok, tell me those wouldn't be cool!?!?

    ******... I'm such a nerd.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Fremont, CA, U.S.A.
    Posts
    48,028

    This thread was way ahead

    Carbon Fiber staffs are to be required for international wushu competition, if the IWuF stays the course. MartialArtsMart.com carries them now.
    Gene Ching
    Publisher www.KungFuMagazine.com
    Author of Shaolin Trips
    Support our forum by getting your gear at MartialArtSmart

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Houston, Tx. USA
    Posts
    1,358
    Quote Originally Posted by GeneChing View Post
    Carbon Fiber staffs are to be required for international wushu competition, if the IWuF stays the course. MartialArtsMart.com carries them now.
    So, they are replacing a $20 white wax staff with a $130 carbon fiber staff. A carbon fiber staff that is more difficult to size for the extremes of height. And the idea is that it is not supposed to shatter in competition.

    Right..... Having seen lifetime warrantied custom staves shatter, having seen competitions having people practice on concrete, and so on, I am going to beat a path to buy a staff that costs 6 times more and probably does not last 5 times as long. It makes zero economic sense.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    998
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam Wiley View Post
    I was wondering what the board's opinion was on creating new weapons for our arts. I mean, what would you think if someone designed a totally new weapon, the techniques to go with it, the training methods and drills, and the forms, too? Would it be presumptuous to do so, or is it about time for something a little different to come along? Would any of you be interested in learning a weapon invented in modern times for your chosen art? Do you think the person who invented the thing would take a lot of crap from people, or would his enginuity be well received?

    *********
    "I put forth my power and he was broken.
    I withdrew my power and he was ground into fine dust."

    -Aleister Crowley, The Vision and the Voice
    Since I imagine myself to be 'classically trained' regarding principle and concept of "CMA"! my preference for modern weapons training would be weight since 95% of wushu weapons are aluminum or some light material that is not representative of some level of reality. Basics of response are still the same as in blocking, "parrying" stabbing, slashing, etc so the conditioning aspect is important. I only say that if one has had exposure to staff, jian or dao and on eis into this process then everything else is easy because the tools are already present. Just adapt to the opponents choice of weapons as usual. When you really think about it, most routines today are of recent development based on nandu requirements so anyone's creativity is the record as opposed to someone's else's view of how stuff should be!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Fremont, CA, U.S.A.
    Posts
    48,028

    I feel ya, GLW.

    Quote Originally Posted by GLW View Post
    And the idea is that it is not supposed to shatter in competition.
    ...
    It makes zero economic sense.
    Actually, I don't think that being shatterproof is the intention. The overt 'intention' is to standardize the weapons, but if that was the case, IWuF would publish the specs of the standardized weapons for international competition. Instead, they just authorize certain manufacturers as 'official'. So it makes a lot of economic sense, but not for us. And by us, I mean all of us. The price of these is so high that we cannot offer a wholesale price at this time, so Tiger Claw isn't offering it, only MartialArtsMart.com.

    I posted it on this thread because it came up on a search, but it's not really appropriate as there is no IWuF competitions for Taijigun, just Taijijian. Perhaps a new thread is needed to discuss the ramifications of competition weapons.
    Gene Ching
    Publisher www.KungFuMagazine.com
    Author of Shaolin Trips
    Support our forum by getting your gear at MartialArtSmart

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Houston, Tx. USA
    Posts
    1,358
    The IWuF has a habit of doing things like this. It is no wonder they can't get their act together for actually getting into the Olympics.

    The original guidelines for the weapons were tied to traditional use. The jian was to be between the bottom and top of the ear when held correctly. The staff was supposed to be at a certain length when by your side with your arm extended above your head....all easily verifiable and customized with a simple saw when you bought a wood staff. The spears had a standard head...but now the spearhead is laughable and the length.....REALLY....

    I am not surprised you can't sell them. The only people that would spend that much on a staff are those with either deep pockets or those that plan on competing in China. And, deep pockets...usually means Mom and Dad are paying for it.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Fremont, CA, U.S.A.
    Posts
    48,028

    I must recant my earlier statement

    Since introducing this product, we have sold several.

    The carbon-fiber staffs aren't required yet, but the IWuF is leaning that direction and it is likely they will be mandatory very soon.

    Those original 'traditional' measurement requirements are still in place but that's it really. That's not enough for a real sport. Take baseball bat or hockey stick regulations. It's much more specific. I don't recall regulations for the spearhead ever - just rules on length.
    Gene Ching
    Publisher www.KungFuMagazine.com
    Author of Shaolin Trips
    Support our forum by getting your gear at MartialArtSmart

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Houston, Tx. USA
    Posts
    1,358
    Quote Originally Posted by GeneChing View Post
    Since introducing this product, we have sold several.

    The carbon-fiber staffs aren't required yet, but the IWuF is leaning that direction and it is likely they will be mandatory very soon.

    Those original 'traditional' measurement requirements are still in place but that's it really. That's not enough for a real sport. Take baseball bat or hockey stick regulations. It's much more specific. I don't recall regulations for the spearhead ever - just rules on length.
    So true. How hard would it be for them to state "The staff must be 35 cm longer than the height of the competitor. The tapered end must be no smaller in diameter than 2.5 cm and no larger than 4 cm and the bottom diameter must be no smaller than 4 cm and no larger than 6 cm. The entire staff must weigh no less than ##."

    They could do the same thing with jian and dao and specify the flexibility of the blade in degrees. It would be VERY easy to do.

    But, the IWuF seems to never take action that makes sense.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •