Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Training Under A Sifu Or A Grandmaster?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Were the wind takes me
    Posts
    73

    Training Under A Sifu Or A Grandmaster?

    What is the diff if you train under a sifu vs a grandmaster?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Biosphere
    Posts
    245
    How much money he charges?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Palm Bay, Florida
    Posts
    415

    Sifu SiYue

    Your direct teacher is always your Master. or Sifu, "father teacher". His teacher is always your Grandmaster or SiYue grandfather teacher "fathers father".
    So in essence you always train under both unless you are loyal to a master and he sends you for a training period to the grandmaster and you return.

    To confuse you further, if you leave your master for his master the man becomes your master.

    Your students call your master Grandmaster so again you are training under a man that has both titles.

    You see the west has perverted these titles into a quasi ranking system that really has simple functional meaning.

    A grandmaster that only teaches one form for 50 years that has students with students is still a grandmaster regardless of how many of this or that he knows or teaches.

    Also the man that trains simple effective movements for fifty years is always a man to be feared, because his execution of those move will be flawless.

    Consequently, even in the perverted western interpretation "or comercial application that older man of simplicity still qualifies as grandmaster

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canada!
    Posts
    23,110
    No difference. Who ever is your teacher is your teacher.
    You still learn, they still teach.
    Kung Fu is good for you.

  5. #5
    All posts right so far. Getting to learn from the grandmaster is an honor reserved for students who show the appropriate attitude and respect of their sifu.

    Leaving your sifu to train with his sifu is confusing to me. If his sifu accepts you as a student it is a slap in the face to student who was your sifu. However, there are special situations, I imagine where it would be appropriate.

    The only different from a quality point of view would be learning from an even more experienced teacher than your immediate sifu. It is a high compliment to be given such an opportunity and usually is reflective of a very good student and a very good teacher as well.

    I would say it is a hallmark of a healthy and desireable style where this kindof thing happens.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Central, NY
    Posts
    972

    Wink

    Quote Originally Posted by MARTIALSTUDANT
    What is the diff if you train under a sifu vs a grandmaster?
    Whether those below you call you Sibok,Sifu or Si hing



    jeff
    少林黑虎門
    Sil Lum Hak Fu Mun
    RIP Kuen "Fred" Woo (sifu)

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    The beast under your bed.
    Posts
    2,010
    IMHE, there is one big difference between a sifu and a grandmaster...
    While the grandmaster may spar on seldom occasion, (any worthwhile system will have grandmasters who are all near jeriatrich) most younger sifu will get in the ring and go pretty balls out with you... Least if they are worth their weight they will.
    "i would show them 8 hours of animal porn and beheadings in a single sitting then make them write a paper about italy." -GDA
    "he said there were tons of mantids fornicating everywhere. While he was there, he was sending me photos of mantis porn regularly." - Gene Ching

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Playa Jobos, Puerto Rico
    Posts
    4,840
    Great grandmaster (founder)

    grandmaster

    master

    student


    I've learned that Westerners have abused the title Sifu ... which really denotes a special relationship where the student lives with the teacher and shares in all the responsibilities of maintaining a house. It's more of a father son relationship.

    MY master quickly corrected me on this when I brought the habit from western teachers of Kung Fu. Sifu dose not apply so easily in a broad sense as the Japanese use of sensei .... where even a higher ranked fellow students who has been put in charge of teaching should be called sensei.

    As for "master," it has as much value as one puts into it. I've been studying martial arts now for 28 years (since I was 4 years old.) In all that time I have only met one man I have referred to as master. It was evident and no other term would apply.... like if all my life I shot hoops on the playground and then received person instruction from Michael Jordan in his prime, and some how he could transmit all his experience so that I could follow it in a way where I find myself heading in a similiar direction.

    I've always said it's better to spend 4 years looking for a good teacher and only training with him for one year, then spending one year for a teacher that turns out to be average (or less) and training for four years.

    Not much in martial arts is hard to do if you have the discipline. Most problems can be worked out in a few days, concepts can even be internalized in a few weeks or months if you train properly.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •